scholarly journals Effect of Taping on Spinal Pain and Disability: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

2015 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 493-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Vanti ◽  
Lucia Bertozzi ◽  
Ivan Gardenghi ◽  
Francesca Turoni ◽  
Andrew A. Guccione ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Myofascial Pain ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Myofascial Pain Syndrome ◽  
Spinal Pain ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Cochrane Central Register

Background Taping is a widely used therapeutic tool for the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders, nevertheless its effectiveness is still uncertain. Purpose The purpose of this study was to conduct a current review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning the effects of elastic and nonelastic taping on spinal pain and disability. Data Sources MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PEDro, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, ISI Web of Knowledge, and SPORTDiscus databases were searched. Study Selection All published RCTs on symptomatic adults with a diagnosis of specific or nonspecific spinal pain, myofascial pain syndrome, or whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) were considered. Data Extraction Two reviewers independently selected the studies and extracted the results. The quality of individual studies was assessed using the PEDro scale, and the evidence was assessed using GRADE criteria. Data Synthesis Eight RCTs were included. Meta-analysis of 4 RCTs on low back pain demonstrated that elastic taping does not significantly reduce pain or disability immediately posttreatment, with a standardized mean difference of −0.31 (95% confidence interval=−0.64, 0.02) and −0.23 (95% confidence interval=−0.49, 0.03), respectively. Results from single trials indicated that both elastic and nonelastic taping are not better than placebo or no treatment on spinal disability. Positive results were found only for elastic taping and only for short-term pain reduction in WAD or specific neck pain. Generally, the effect sizes were very small or not clinically relevant, and all results were supported by low-quality evidence. Limitations The paucity of studies does not permit us to draw any final conclusions. Conclusion Although different types of taping were investigated, the results of this systematic review did not show any firm support for their effectiveness.

scholarly journals Interpersonal psychotherapy for perinatal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine S. Bright ◽  
Elyse M. Charrois ◽  
Muhammad Kashif Mughal ◽  
Abdul Wajid ◽  
Deborah McNeil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Full Text ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Interpersonal Psychotherapy ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Perinatal Women

Abstract Background Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) is an intervention that has established efficacy in the prevention and treatment of depressive disorders. Previous systematic reviews have not evaluated the effectiveness of IPT on symptoms of stress, anxiety, depression, quality of life, relationship satisfaction/quality, social supports, and an improved psychological sense of well-being. There is limited data regarding factors that moderate and mediate the effectiveness of IPT including the timing of the intervention or the mode of delivery of IPT intervention. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of IPT interventions to treat perinatal psychological distress and to summarize the evidence on predictors, mediators, and moderators of IPT. Methods We will include peer-reviewed studies that recruited perinatal women. The search strategy will involve the following databases: MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Ovid), CINAHL with Full Text (EBSCO), Social Work Abstracts (EBSCO), SocINDEX with Full Text (EBSCO), Academic Search Complete (EBSCO), Family & Society Studies Worldwide (EBSCO), Family Studies Abstracts (EBSCO), and Scopus. Study inclusion criteria include (1) randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, and pre-post studies that evaluated the effectiveness of IPT; (2) qualitative studies that evaluated feasibility and acceptability of IPT; (3) study sample included and analyzed perinatal women; and (4) publication language was English. Using pilot-tested screening and data extraction forms, two reviewers will independently review studies in three steps: (1) abstract/title screening, (2) full-text screening of potentially accepted studies, and (3) data extraction of accepted studies. Disagreements will be resolved by a third reviewer. Studies will be aggregated for meta-synthesis and meta-analysis should the data allow for this. Two independent reviewers will grade methodological quality. Discussion Findings from this review will inform future development and implementation of IPT intervention research for perinatal women. Identifying key factors of successful IPT interventions will inform intervention design and adaptation of IPT interventions to increase the likelihood that perinatal women will engage in and benefit from IPT interventions. This review will also identify key considerations for increasing the effectiveness of IPT interventions during the perinatal period. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42019114292

Effect of Premorbid Beta-Blockers on Mortality in Patients With Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 088506662110529
Author(s):  
Daisuke Hasegawa ◽  
Ryota Sato ◽  
Narut Prasitlumkum ◽  
Kazuki Nishida
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Short Term Mortality ◽  
The Impact

Objective The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the impact of premorbid beta-blockers on mortality in patients with sepsis. Data Sources We searched EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and MEDLINE for eligible studies. The protocol was registered at the PROSPERO (CRD42021256813). Study Selection Two authors independently evaluated the following inclusion criteria: (1) randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, cross-sectional studies; (2) patients with sepsis aged ≥18 years, and (3) premorbid beta-blocker use. Data Extraction Two authors extracted the patients’ characteristics and outcomes independently. All analyses were performed using the random-effects models. The primary outcome was short-term mortality, defined as mortality within 30 days, in-hospital or intensive care unit mortality. Data Synthesis Ten studies (n = 24 748 patients) were included. The pooled odds ratio (OR) of short-term mortality associated with the premorbid use of beta-blockers was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-1.04; P = .12; I2 = 50%). Five studies reported an adjusted OR of short-term mortality. The pooled adjusted OR of short-term mortality associated with the premorbid use of beta-blockers was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.65-0.83; P < .001; I2 = 0%). Conclusion Premorbid beta-blockers were associated with a lower short-term mortality in patients with sepsis.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of ultrasound therapy for myofascial pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol Volume 10 ◽  
pp. 545-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Xia ◽  
Xiaoju Wang ◽  
Qiang Lin ◽  
Kai Cheng ◽  
Xueping Li
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Myofascial Pain ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Myofascial Pain Syndrome ◽  
Ultrasound Therapy

scholarly journals Are behaviour change techniques and intervention features associated with effectiveness of digital cardiac rehabilitation programmes? A systematic review protocol

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 88
Author(s):  
Eanna Kenny ◽  
John W. McEvoy ◽  
Jenny McSharry ◽  
Linda M. Collins ◽  
Rod S. Taylor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cardiac Rehabilitation ◽  
Behaviour Change ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Behaviour Change Techniques ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Behaviour Change Technique ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a complex intervention that aims to stabilise, slow, or reverse the progression of CVD and improve patients’ functional status and quality of life. Digitally delivered CR has been shown to be effective and can overcome many of the access barriers associated with traditional centre-based delivered CR programmes. However, there is a limited understanding of the behaviour change techniques (BCTs) and intervention features that maximise the effectiveness of digital programmes. Therefore, this systematic review will aim to identify the BCTs that have been used in digital CR programmes and to determine which BCTs and intervention features are associated with programme effectiveness. Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE, CINHAL, PsycINFO and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be searched from inception to June 2021 for randomised controlled trials of digital CR with CVD patients. Screening, data extraction, intervention coding and risk of bias will be performed by one reviewer with a second reviewer independently verifying a random 20% of the articles. Intervention content will be coded using the behaviour change technique taxonomy v1 and the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist and intervention features will be identified. A meta-analysis will be conducted to calculate the pooled effect size of each outcome, and meta-regression analyses will investigate whether intervention features and the presence and absence of individual BCTs in interventions are associated with intervention effectiveness. Discussion: The review will identify BCTs and intervention features that are associated with digital CR programmes and adopt a systematic approach to describe the content of these programmes using the BCT taxonomy (v1) and TIDieR checklist. The results will provide key insights into the content and design of successful digital CR programmes, providing a foundation for further development, testing and refinement.

scholarly journals Hyaluronic acid for tissue and bone regeneration after tooth extraction. Systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuheng Lai ◽  
Francisco Novillo ◽  
Geovanna Cárdenas ◽  
Francisca Verdugo ◽  
Gabriel Rada
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hyaluronic Acid ◽  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Tooth Extraction ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Eligibility Criteria

AbstractObjectiveThe objective of this systematic review is to assess the effectiveness and safety of Hyaluronic Acid (HA) on tissue and bone regeneration after tooth extraction.Data SourcesWe will conduct a comprehensive search in Epistemonikos, PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), LILACS, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), ClinicalTrials.gov, US National Institutes of Health (NIH) and grey literature, to identify all relevant randomized controlled trials regardless of language or publication status (published, unpublished, in press and in progress).Eligibility Criteria for Selecting Studies and MethodsWe will include randomized trials evaluating the effect of HA on tissue and bone regeneration after tooth extraction. Two reviewers will independently screen each study for eligibility, data extraction, and assess the risk of bias. We will pool the results using meta-analysis and will apply the GRADE system to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome.Ethics and DisseminationNo ethics approval is considered necessary. The results of this review will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, social networks, and traditional media.PROSPERO Registration IDCRD42020150285

scholarly journals Evidence for Kinesio Taping in Management of Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 861-862
Author(s):  
Lin Liu ◽  
Jiao Lu ◽  
Yan Chen ◽  
Juan Wei ◽  
Xue-Feng Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Myofascial Pain ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Myofascial Pain Syndrome ◽  
Kinesio Taping
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document