scholarly journals ACC/AHA Special Report: Clinical Practice Guideline Implementation Strategies: A Summary of Systematic Reviews by the NHLBI Implementation Science Work Group

Circulation ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 135 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wiley V. Chan ◽  
Thomas A. Pearson ◽  
Glen C. Bennett ◽  
William C. Cushman ◽  
Thomas A. Gaziano ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 14 ◽  
pp. 7591-7598
Author(s):  
Bashar Qumseya ◽  
April Goddard ◽  
Amira Qumseya ◽  
David Estores ◽  
Peter V Draganov ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tessa Commers ◽  
David Williams ◽  
Jason Newland ◽  
Keith Mann ◽  
Jeffrey Michael ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Hanna-Leena Melender ◽  
Salla Pirkola ◽  
Kaisa Imppola ◽  
Helinä Ahonen ◽  
Saija Seppelin

The purpose of this clinical practice guideline implementation effort was to put into practice a Finnish nursing guideline on emotional support for preschool-aged children in day-surgery nursing for nurses at a day-surgery unit. The strategy was to use a 10-step framework in the implementation process. In this brief article, the strategy and the outcomes of the guideline implementation effort are described.


BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. e031442
Author(s):  
Carole Lunny ◽  
Cynthia Ramasubbu ◽  
Savannah Gerrish ◽  
Tracy Liu ◽  
Douglas M Salzwedel ◽  
...  

IntroductionGuidelines are systematically developed recommendations to assist practitioner and patient decisions about treatments for clinical conditions. High quality and comprehensive systematic reviews and ‘overviews of systematic reviews’ (overviews) represent the best available evidence. Many guideline developers, such as the WHO and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, recommend the use of these research syntheses to underpin guideline recommendations. We aim to evaluate the impact and use of systematic reviews with and without pairwise meta-analysis or network meta-analyses (NMAs) and overviews in clinical practice guideline (CPG) recommendations.Methods and analysisCPGs will be retrieved from Turning Research Into Practice and Epistemonikos (2017–2018). The retrieved citations will be sorted randomly and then screened sequentially by two independent reviewers until 50 CPGs have been identified. We will include CPGs that provide at least two explicit recommendations for the management of any clinical condition. We will assess whether reviews or overviews were cited in a recommendation as part of the development process for guidelines. Data extraction will be done independently by two authors and compared. We will assess the risk of bias by examining how each guideline developed clinical recommendations. We will calculate the number and frequency of citations of reviews with or without pairwise meta-analysis, reviews with NMAs and overviews, and whether they were systematically or non-systematically developed. Results will be described, tabulated and categorised based on review type (reviews or overviews). CPGs reporting the use of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach will be compared with those using a different system, and pharmacological versus non-pharmacological CPGs will be compared.Ethics and disseminationNo ethics approval is required. We will present at the Cochrane Colloquium and the Guidelines International Network conference.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document