Abstract 2450: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Low Dose Hormone Therapy on Myocardial Ischemia in Postmenopausal Women with No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease:Results from the NHLBI-sponsored WISE

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Bairey Merz ◽  
Marian Olson ◽  
Candace McClure ◽  
James Symons ◽  
George Sopko ◽  
...  

Background: Compared with men, women have more evidence of myocardial ischemia in the setting of no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). While low endogenous estrogen levels are associated with endothelial dysfunction, the role of low dose hormone therapy has not been fully evaluated in women suffering from myocardial ischemia and no obstructive CAD. Objective: This WISE ancillary trial evaluated the effect of low dose hormone therapy in postmenopausal women with myocardial ischemia and no obstructive CAD on: endothelial dysfunction, assessed by brachial artery reactivity, physical functional disability assessed by exercise testing, and quality of life assessed by cardiac symptoms and psychological questionnaires. Methods: Using a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled design, seventy-four participants with normal/minimally diseased epicardial coronary arteries (<50% luminal diameter stenosis) who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were planned to be randomized to receive either 1 mg norethindrone/10 mcg ethinyl estradiol (1/10 NA/EE) or placebo for twelve weeks. Baseline and exit brachial artery reactivity (BART), exercise stress testing, WISE psychosocial questionnaires, SF-36, blood lipids and hormone levels were evaluated. Results: Recruitment was closed prematurely due to failure to recruit in the year following publication of the Women’s Health Initiative hormone trial results. Of the 37 women randomized, 35 completed the study. While there was no difference in the frequency of chest pain between groups at the baseline visit, at study exit there was less frequent chest pain in the 1/10 NA/EE group compared to the placebo group (p=0.02). Women taking 1/10 NA/EE also showed a trend to improved BART and exercise tolerance, and had significantly fewer hot flashes/night sweats (p=0.003), less avoidance of intimacy (p=0.05), and borderline differences in sexual desire and vaginal dryness (p=0.06). Conclusion: Among postmenopausal women with myocardial ischemia and no obstructive CAD, hormone therapy with 1/10 NA/EE is associated with reduced chest pain symptoms, menopausal symptoms and improved quality of life with trends for improved endothelial function and exercise performance.

Maturitas ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvaro Fernando Polisseni ◽  
Amaury Teixeira Leite Andrade ◽  
Luiz Claudio Ribeiro ◽  
Isabela Queirós Castro ◽  
Marcos Brandão ◽  
...  

JAMA ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 287 (5) ◽  
pp. 591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Hlatky ◽  
Derek Boothroyd ◽  
Eric Vittinghoff ◽  
Penny Sharp ◽  
Mary A. Whooley ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Rosanna Tavella ◽  
Natalie Cutri ◽  
John F Beltrame

BACKGROUND. Patients with chest pain and no evidence of obstructive coronary artery disease on angiography (NoCAD) are frequently considered not to have significant pathology and their symptoms trivialized. This study compared the health status of patients with NoCAD, obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and healthy subjects. METHOD. Patients undergoing angiography within the preceding 12 months for the investigation of chest pain were categorized as NoCAD or CAD on the basis of the angiographic findings and completed a health-related quality of life instrument, the Short Form-36 (SF-36). These were compared with a ‘healthy control’ group that were randomly selected from the electronic white pages and recruited if they had no self-reported history of cardiovascular disease. Cross sectional comparisons between the three groups were age adjusted and performed using liner regression. RESULTS. As shown in the table below, the healthy controls were significantly younger and therefore comparison of SF36 scores were age adjusted. All SF-36 sub-scales (except for bodily pain) and summary scores (see table ), were significantly lower in the CAD and NoCAD groups compared to the healthy controls. There were no differences in SF-36 scores between NoCAD and CAD. CONCLUSION. Compared with a healthy population, patients with stable CAD and NoCAD have significantly poorer quality of life asF-36. Future management strategies need to address the health outcomes in these patients. Healthy Controls (n = 3168) NoCAD (n = 320) CAD (n = 828) Age 52 ± 15 57 ± 12 * 62 ± 11 # SF-36: Physical Summary Score 49 ± 10 41 ± 11 * 41 ± 11 # SF-36: Mental Summary Score 51 ± 10 46 ± 11 * 46 ± 11 # * p <0.01 for healthy controls vs NoCAD, # p <0.01 for healthy controls vs CAD


Neurology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 87 (14) ◽  
pp. 1457-1463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riley Bove ◽  
Charles C. White ◽  
Kathryn C. Fitzgerald ◽  
Tanuja Chitnis ◽  
Lori Chibnik ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Michael J. Gast ◽  
Murray A. Freedman ◽  
Alberta J. Vieweg ◽  
Nilson R. De Melo ◽  
Manoel J.B.C. Girão ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 660-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kalliopi L. Koundi ◽  
George E. Christodoulakos ◽  
Irene V. Lambrinoudaki ◽  
Ioannis M. Zervas ◽  
Areti Spyropoulou ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document