Abstract 2819: Identification and Characterization of Super-Responders to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: An Echocardiographic Study

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amira Zaroui ◽  
Patricia Reant ◽  
Erwan Donal ◽  
Aude Mignot ◽  
Pierre Bordachar ◽  
...  

In some patients, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been recently shown to induce a spectacular effect on left ventricular (LV) function and inverted remodeling with nearby normalization of LV contraction. Objectives: To analyze and characterize super-responders (CRTSR) by echocardiography before CRT. 186 patients have been investigated before and 6 months after implantation of a CRT device with conventional indication according to ESC guidelines. Echocardiographies including measurements of LV dimensions, and contraction by 2-dimensional strain, and pressure assessment, mitral valve analysis were performed at baseline and at 6 months in an independent core-center lab. CRTSR were defined as a reduction of end-systolic volume of at least 15% and an ejection fraction (EF)>50% and were compared to normal responder patients (CRTNo, patients with a reduction of end-systolic volume of at least 15% but an EF <50%). 17/186 patients (9.1%) were identified as CRTSR, only 2 with ischemic cardiomyopathy (p<0.01). No difference was observed regarding NYHA status, EKG duration or EF between CRTSR and CRTNo at baseline. CRTSR presented with significant lower end-diastolic and end-systolic diameters (64±9mm vs 73±9mm (p<0.01) and 53±7.4mm vs 63±8.4mm (p<0.01), respectively), and end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes 161±44ml vs 210±76ml (p<0.02) and 123±43ml vs 163±69ml (p<0.01)) as well as a higher LV dP/dt max (714±251mmHg.s −1 vs 527±188 mmHg.s −1 (p<0.05)). Regarding strain analysis, CRTSR had significantly higher longitudinal values than CRTNo (−12.8±3% vs −9±2.6%, p<0.001) whereas no difference was observed for other components (p ns). Global longitudinal strain obtained by ROC curves was identified as the best parameter for predicting CRTSR with a cut-off value of −11% (Se=80%, Spe=87%, AUC=0.89, p<0.002) and was confirmed as an independent predictor by the logistic regression (RR: 21.3, p<0.0001). In a large multicenter study, CRT super-responders (EF>50%) were observed in 9% of the population and were associated with less-depressed LV function as determined by strain analysis. Global longitudinal strain appears to be the best predictor of CRTSR.

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 1112-1119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pieter van der Bijl ◽  
Marina V Kostyukevich ◽  
Mand Khidir ◽  
Nina Ajmone Marsan ◽  
Victoria Delgado ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can reduce left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), and a decrease of ≥15% is defined as a response. CRT can also improve LV global longitudinal strain (GLS). Changes in LVESV and LV GLS are individually associated with outcome post-CRT. We investigated LVESV and LV GLS changes and prognostic implications of improvement in LVESV and/or LV GLS, compared with no improvement in either parameter. Methods and results Baseline and 6-month echocardiograms were analysed from CRT recipients with heart failure. LV reverse remodelling was defined as a ≥15% reduction in LVESV at 6 months post-CRT. A ≥5% absolute improvement in LV GLS was defined as a change in LV GLS. A total of 1185 patients were included (mean age 65 ± 10 years, 73% male), and those with an improvement in LVESV and LV GLS (n = 131, 11.1%) had significantly lower mortality compared with other groups. On multivariable analysis, an improvement in both LVESV and LV GLS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.47; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.31–0.71; P < 0.001] or an improvement in either LVESV or LV GLS (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.47–0.71; P < 0.001) were independently associated with better prognosis, compared with no improvement in either parameter. Conclusion Either a reduction in LVESV and/or an improvement in LV GLS at 6 months post-CRT are independently associated with improved long-term prognosis, compared with no change in both LVESV and LV GLS. This supports the use of LV GLS as a meaningful parameter in defining CRT response.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Odette A E Salden ◽  
Alwin Zweerink ◽  
Philippe Wouters ◽  
Cornelis P Allaart ◽  
Bastiaan Geelhoed ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may be enhanced by evaluation of systolic myocardial stretching. We evaluate whether systolic septal rebound stretch (SRSsept) derived from speckle tracking echocardiography is a predictor of reverse remodelling after CRT and whether it holds additive predictive value over the simpler visual dyssynchrony assessment by apical rocking (ApRock). Methods and results The association between SRSsept and change in left ventricular end-systolic volume (ΔLVESV) at 6 months of follow-up was assessed in 200 patients. Subsequently, the additive predictive value of SRSsept over the assessment of ApRock was evaluated in patients with and without left bundle branch block (LBBB) according to strict criteria. SRSsept was independently associated with ΔLVESV (β 0.221, P = 0.002) after correction for sex, age, ischaemic cardiomyopathy, QRS morphology and duration, and ApRock. A high SRSsept (≥optimal cut-off value 2.4) also coincided with more volumetric responders (ΔLVESV ≥ −15%) than low SRSsept in the entire cohort (70.0% and 56.4%), in patients with strict LBBB (83.3% vs. 56.7%, P = 0.024), and non-LBBB (70.7% vs. 46.3%, P = 0.004). Moreover, in non-LBBB patients, SRSsept held additional predictive information over the assessment of ApRock alone since patients that showed ApRock and high SRSsept were more often volumetric responder than those with ApRock but low SRSsept (82.8% vs. 47.4%, P = 0.001). Conclusion SRSsept is strongly associated with CRT-induced reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume and holds additive prognostic information over QRS morphology and ApRock. Our data suggest that CRT patient selection may be improved by assessment of SRSsept, especially in the important subgroup without strict LBBB. Clinical trial registration The MARC study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01519908.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (35) ◽  
pp. 2979-2987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe Leclercq ◽  
Haran Burri ◽  
Antonio Curnis ◽  
Peter Paul Delnoy ◽  
Christopher A Rinaldi ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims To assess the impact of MultiPoint™ Pacing (MPP)—programmed according to the physician’s discretion—in non-responders to standard biventricular pacing after 6 months. Methods and results The study enrolled 1921 patients receiving a quadripolar cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) system capable of MPP™ therapy. A core laboratory assessed echocardiography at baseline and 6 months and defined volumetric non-response to biventricular pacing as <15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV). Clinical sites randomized patients classified as non-responders in a 1:1 ratio to receive MPP (236 patients) or continued biventricular pacing (231 patients) for an additional 6 months and evaluated rate of conversion to echocardiographic response. Baseline characteristics of both groups were comparable. No difference was observed in non-responder to responder conversion rate between MPP and biventricular pacing (31.8% and 33.8%, P = 0.72). In the MPP arm, 68 (29%) patients received MPP programmed with a wide LV electrode anatomical separation (≥30 mm) and shortest LV1–LV2 and LV2–RV timing delays (MPP-AS); 168 (71%) patients received MPP programmed with other settings (MPP-Other). MPP-AS elicited a significantly higher non-responder conversion rate compared to MPP-Other (45.6% vs. 26.2%, P = 0.006) and a trend in a higher conversion rate compared to biventricular pacing (45.6% vs. 33.8%, P = 0.10). Conclusions After 6 months, investigator-discretionary MPP programming did not significantly increase echocardiographic response compared to biventricular pacing in CRT non-responders.


Author(s):  
Stacey Howell ◽  
Tim Stivland ◽  
Kenneth Stein ◽  
Kenneth Ellenbogen ◽  
Larisa Tereshchenko

Introduction—We aimed to apply machine learning (ML) to develop a prediction model for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response. Methods and Results—Participants from the SmartDelay Determined AV Optimization (SMART-AV) trial (n=741; age, 66 ±11 yrs; 33% female; 100% NYHA III-IV; 100% EF≤35%) were randomly split into training & testing (80%; n=593), and validation (20%; n=148) samples. Baseline clinical, ECG, echocardiographic and biomarker characteristics, and left ventricular (LV) lead position (43 variables) were included in 6 ML models (random forests, convolutional neural network, lasso, adaptive lasso, plugin lasso, elastic net, ridge, and logistic regression). A composite of freedom from death and heart failure hospitalization and a >15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume index at 6-months post-CRT was the endpoint. The primary endpoint was met by 337 patients (45.5%). The adaptive lasso model was more accurate than class I ACC/AHA guidelines criteria (AUC 0.759; 95%CI 0.678-0.840 versus 0.639; 95%CI 0.554-0.722; P<0.0001), well-calibrated, and parsimonious (19 predictors; nearly half are potentially modifiable). The model predicted CRT response with 70% accuracy, 70% sensitivity, and 70% specificity, and should be further validated in prospective studies. Conclusions—ML predicts short-term CRT response and thus may help with CRT procedure planning.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhongkai Wang ◽  
Pan Li ◽  
Bili Zhang ◽  
Jingjuan Huang ◽  
Shaoping Chen ◽  
...  

Background: The patient-tailored SyncAV algorithm shortens the QRS duration (QRSd) beyond what conventional biventricular (BiV) pacing can. However, evidence of the ability of SyncAV to improve the cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response is lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of CRT enhanced by SyncAV on echocardiographic and clinical responses.Methods and Results: Consecutive heart failure (HF) patients from three centers treated with a quadripolar CRT system (Abbott) were enrolled. The total of 122 patients were divided into BiV+SyncAV (n = 68) and BiV groups (n = 54) according to whether they underwent CRT with or without SyncAV. Electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and clinical data were assessed at baseline and during follow-up. Echocardiographic response to CRT was defined as a ≥15% decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), and clinical response was defined as a NYHA class reduction of ≥1. At the 6-month follow-up, the baseline QRSd and LVESV decreased more significantly in the BiV+SyncAV than in the BiV group (QRSd −36.25 ± 16.33 vs. −22.72 ± 18.75 ms, P &lt; 0.001; LVESV −54.19 ± 38.87 vs. −25.37 ± 36.48 ml, P &lt; 0.001). Compared to the BiV group, more patients in the BiV+SyncAV group were classified as echocardiographic (82.35 vs. 64.81%; P = 0.036) and clinical responders (83.82 vs. 66.67%; P = 0.033). During follow-up, no deaths due to HF deterioration or severe procedure related complications occurred.Conclusion: Compared to BiV pacing, BiV combined with SyncAV leads to a more significant reduction in QRSd and improves LV remodeling and long-term outcomes in HF patients treated with CRT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document