Abstract 17027: Racial Disparities in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Access: Geographic Analysis Suggesting Disparate Access to Care

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nidal Ganim ◽  
Dominique J Monlezun ◽  
Enrique D Garcia-Sayan ◽  
Prakash Balan

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has ample randomized trial evidence that it can reduce mortality and cost for patients with aortic stenosis. Yet racial disparities in procedure access are poorly understood. Methods: This case-control prospectively enrolled TAVR subjects at a single high-volume quaternary academic medical center in Houston, Texas, USA, from 11/8/11-3/28/18. Neural network machine learning-supported binomial probability testing was conducted comparing the Houston population versus the center’s TAVR rates by race, with mortality and cost extrapolations. The IOM definition of health inequities was applied using the rank and replace method for counterfactual comparison (matching subjects by insurance and Society of Thoracic Surgery [STS] risk score for TAVR eligibility). Results: Compared to the Houston population, TAVR subjects (N=1641) were significantly more likely to be Caucasians (51.93% vs 77.26%), and less likely to be African Americans (14.80% vs 6.02%), Hispanics (23.63% vs 15.02%), or other races (9.50% vs 1.70%), all p<0.001. Among TAVR subjects with private insurance, the large majority were Caucasian (832, 85.60%), with the minority being African American (34, 3.50%), Hispanic (96, 9.88%), and other (10, 37.04%) (private insurance by Caucasian versus non-Caucasian, p<0.001). Based on TAVR mortality and cost savings in the PARNTER trial, access disparities for racial minorities over 5 years may result in 858 excess deaths, $130,000 per patient excess costs, and $111.5 million excess costs per the overall sample of eligible presenting Houston subjects. The predicted versus actual racial distribution of TAVR for each minority group matched to Caucasians by insurance and STS score was significantly greater than the actual (each group comparison to Caucasians, p<0.001). Conclusion: Multi-year data from our high-volume center suggest Houston racial minorities are less likely to undergo TAVR, potentially translating into a growing number of preventable excess early deaths and costs as disease incidence increases. Additional studies are underway to determine and reduce the degree of preventable race-related disparities independent of known access predictors.

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lise Tchouta ◽  
Hechuan Hou ◽  
Karen Kim ◽  
Mike Thompson

Introduction: Volume-outcome relationships are well defined in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), but little is known about how hospital experience in aortic valve replacement (AVR) informs processes of care to rescue patients once a complication occurs after TAVR. Hypothesis: Increasing AVR experience improves post-TAVR rates of failure to rescue (FTR) - defined as in-hospital mortality after major treatable post-procedural complications. Methods: Statewide Inpatient Databases from seven diverse states were queried from 2011 to 2017 for patients who underwent TAVR. Hospitals were stratified as low vs high-volume by mean annualized SAVR and TAVR volume using the median as cutoff: SAVR = 43 cases/year, TAVR = 28 cases/year. Crude rates of complications, in-hospital mortality, and FTR were estimated for the overall sample and stratified by SAVR and TAVR volume (low vs high). Logistic regression was used to estimate the adjusted odds ratio of SAVR and TAVR volume, independently, on the outcomes above, adjusting for patient demographics and comorbid conditions. Results: A total of 42,025 TAVR patients were identified and categorized as low (N = 2,946) or high-volume (N = 39,079) SAVR centers, and low (N = 7,183) or high-volume (N = 34,842) TAVR centers. Within the high-volume SAVR centers, 84.8% were also high-volume TAVR centers. Low SAVR or TAVR volume was associated with a marginal increase in the risk of developing complications after TAVR (OR 1.26; P < 0.001 and OR 1.14; P < 0.001) as show in Table 1. There was no statistically significant difference in risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality rates (OR 1.10; P = 0.499 and OR 1.10; P = 0.273) or FTR rates (OR 0.97; P = 0.816 and OR 1.03; P = 0.732) after TAVR between low- and high-volume SAVR or TAVR centers, respectively. Conclusion: Undergoing TAVR at a high-volume SAVR or TAVR center was associated with lower rates of complications, but volume was not an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality or FTR.


2018 ◽  
Vol 111 (8-9) ◽  
pp. 534-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Huchet ◽  
Fanny d’Acremont ◽  
Vincent Letocart ◽  
Patrice Guerin ◽  
Gael Grimandi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document