Abstract 12675: Comprehensive Analysis of Cardiomyopathy and Arrhythmia Genes Yields Unanticipated Molecular Diagnoses

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Callis ◽  
Ana Morales ◽  
Rebecca Truty ◽  
Matteo Vatta ◽  
Ellen Regalado ◽  
...  

Introduction: Professional societies recommend genetic testing to improve diagnosis and inform management of inherited cardiovascular disease, yet genetic testing is not widely utilized in cardiovascular practice. To reduce barriers to genetic testing and facilitate following of existing guidelines, we initiated a program of sponsored genetic testing with genetic counseling at no cost to patients suspected of having a genetic arrhythmia or cardiomyopathy. Here, we describe unanticipated molecular diagnoses provided by a comprehensive analysis of cardiomyopathy and arrhythmia genes. Methods: With IRB approval, de-identified genetic and clinical data provided by ordering clinicians were reviewed from 1,606 individuals referred for testing through the sponsored, no-charge Detect Cardiomyopathy and Arrhythmia genetic testing program between July 2019 and January 2020. Testing consisted of a cardiomyopathy and arrhythmia panel of up to 150 genes detecting single nucleotide, small indel, and exon-level deletion and duplication variants. Results: Overall, 20.5% (329/1606) of patients had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant identified. The most common reasons for referral were hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (40%), dilated cardiomyopathy (24%), and long QT syndrome (13%). The diagnostic yield was 25% (130/527) among patients whose healthcare provider reported a high or moderate index of clinical suspicion for a genetic cardiomyopathy, of whom 2% (2/130) had P/LP variants only in the arrhythmia gene KCNQ1 . Conversely, among patients with a high or moderate index of clinical suspicion for a genetic arrhythmia, the diagnostic yield was 20% (28/137), of which 18% (5/28) had P/LP variants only in the cardiomyopathy-associated genes MYBPC3 (2) and TTR (3). Conclusions: These data demonstrate that comprehensive genetic testing, without cost as a barrier, identifies clinically-relevant variants in 1 in 5 suspected cardiomyopathy or arrhythmia patients. Notably, genetic testing with a multi-condition panel yielded unanticipated molecular findings likely to change clinical management in up to 18% of genetically-positive patients. These unanticipated findings would have likely been missed by targeted, disease-specific panels.

Heart Rhythm ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 1304-1311
Author(s):  
Annika Winbo ◽  
Nikki Earle ◽  
Luciana Marcondes ◽  
Jackie Crawford ◽  
Debra O. Prosser ◽  
...  

Heart Rhythm ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. S46 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Tester ◽  
Melissa L. Will ◽  
Carla M. Haglund ◽  
Michael J. Ackerman

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Praloy Chakraborty ◽  
Jason D. Roberts ◽  
Michael H. Gollob

Abstract Ventricular repolarisation can be influenced by hormonal milieu which may mimic long QT syndrome. We describe a series of patients referred for genetic testing for diagnosed long QT syndrome where a detailed clinical workup demonstrated endocrinopathies as the cause of presumed “gene negative” long QT syndrome and QT prolongation.


PLoS Currents ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. e4f9995f69e6c7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen M. Modell ◽  
David J. Bradley ◽  
Michael H. Lehmann

Author(s):  
Andrea Mazzanti ◽  
Katherine Underwood ◽  
Silvia G. Priori

Genetic information is fundamental for the management of patients with primary arrhythmia syndromes (e.g. long QT syndrome or catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia) and cardiomyopathies (e.g. arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy) which increase the risk of sudden cardiac death. Importantly, molecular testing can play a pivotal role in establishing a clinical diagnosis of an inherited cardiovascular disease, particularly when the phenotype in unclear and overlaps with the normal adaptations induced in the heart by chronic exercise. However, the decision to undergo genetic testing needs to be justified on a clinical basis and handled by professionals who are capable of framing the results in the correct perspective. In this chapter we will answer the following questions. When should genetic testing be performed in athletes? Which genetic tests should be requested for athletes? What impact should a positive genetic result have on sports eligibility?


2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco V. Perez ◽  
Narmadan A. Kumarasamy ◽  
Douglas K. Owens ◽  
Paul J. Wang ◽  
Mark A. Hlatky

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 137 (6) ◽  
pp. 619-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Giudicessi ◽  
Dan M. Roden ◽  
Arthur A.M. Wilde ◽  
Michael J. Ackerman

2020 ◽  
Vol 60 ◽  
pp. 8-11
Author(s):  
Konstantinos P. Letsas ◽  
Efstathia Prappa ◽  
George Bazoukis ◽  
Louiza Lioni ◽  
Malena P. Pantou ◽  
...  

Heart Rhythm ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 1977-1982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morgan M. Medlock ◽  
David J. Tester ◽  
Melissa L. Will ◽  
J. Martijn Bos ◽  
Michael J. Ackerman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document