Abstract 15777: Induction Immunosuppression is Associated With a Lower Incidence of Post-transplant Diabetes Mellitus in Heart Transplant Recipients: A Propensity-adjusted Analysis

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Suruchi K Gupta ◽  
Elizabeth Mostofsky ◽  
Wenyuan Li ◽  
Ali Hage ◽  
Shweta R Motiwala ◽  
...  

Introduction: Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a common complication among heart transplant recipients resulting in heightened risk of diabetes-related complications and death. While there is evidence that certain maintenance immunosuppression drugs like tacrolimus increase the risk of PTDM, it is not known whether induction immunosuppression does the same. We therefore evaluated whether induction immunosuppression in the early post-transplant period with IL-2 inhibitors, alemtuzumab or anti-thymocyte globulin is associated with PTDM after accounting for potential confounding by indication. Methods: Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we conducted a cohort study of 23,946 US adults who received a heart transplant in January 2008-December 2018. PTDM was defined as new diagnosis of diabetes at any time 6 months after transplant. We excluded patients with prior organ transplants and diabetes. We used logistic regression to construct propensity scores for predictors of induction immunosuppression and risk factors for PTDM including demographic, clinical and immunologic factors, pre-transplant therapies, steroids, functional status, and transplant year. We estimated the effect of induction immunosuppression in propensity-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models and produced fully adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves using inverse probability of treatment weights. Results: The average age was 54 (SD=12.5) years, 26% were female and 12,303 (51%) received induction immunosuppression. Over 84,969 person-years, 2,678 (11%) developed PTDM (32 cases/1,000 person-years). In the propensity-adjusted analysis, induction immunosuppression was associated with a 20% lower rate of PTDM (Figure 1; hazard ratio=0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.74-0.87). Conclusions: Adult heart transplant recipients who received induction immunosuppression had a 20% lower rate of PTDM compared to those who did not receive it.

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Augusto Di Castelnuovo ◽  
Simona Costanzo ◽  
Andrea Antinori ◽  
Nausicaa Berselli ◽  
Lorenzo Blandi ◽  
...  

Background: Protease inhibitors have been considered as possible therapeutic agents for COVID-19 patients.Objectives: To describe the association between lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) or darunavir/cobicistat (DRV/c) use and in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients.Study Design: Multicenter observational study of COVID-19 patients admitted in 33 Italian hospitals. Medications, preexisting conditions, clinical measures, and outcomes were extracted from medical records. Patients were retrospectively divided in three groups, according to use of LPV/r, DRV/c or none of them. Primary outcome in a time-to event analysis was death. We used Cox proportional-hazards models with inverse probability of treatment weighting by multinomial propensity scores.Results: Out of 3,451 patients, 33.3% LPV/r and 13.9% received DRV/c. Patients receiving LPV/r or DRV/c were more likely younger, men, had higher C-reactive protein levels while less likely had hypertension, cardiovascular, pulmonary or kidney disease. After adjustment for propensity scores, LPV/r use was not associated with mortality (HR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.13), whereas treatment with DRV/c was associated with a higher death risk (HR = 1.89, 1.53 to 2.34, E-value = 2.43). This increased risk was more marked in women, in elderly, in patients with higher severity of COVID-19 and in patients receiving other COVID-19 drugs.Conclusions: In a large cohort of Italian patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in a real-life setting, the use of LPV/r treatment did not change death rate, while DRV/c was associated with increased mortality. Within the limits of an observational study, these data do not support the use of LPV/r or DRV/c in COVID-19 patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. e450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew G. Cehic ◽  
Christopher A. Muir ◽  
Jerry R. Greenfield ◽  
Christopher Hayward ◽  
Andrew Jabbour ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S236
Author(s):  
Ainat Beniaminovitz ◽  
Helen Hauff ◽  
Katherine Lietz ◽  
David Cohen

2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 92-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria K. Lizak ◽  
Michał Zakliczyński ◽  
Anna Jarosz ◽  
Marian Zembala ◽  
Zbigniew Kalarus

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document