scholarly journals Novel Indices of Coronary Physiology

Author(s):  
Giovanni Luigi De Maria ◽  
Hector M. Garcia-Garcia ◽  
Roberto Scarsini ◽  
Alexandre Hideo-Kajita ◽  
Nieves Gonzalo López ◽  
...  

Fractional flow reserve is the current invasive gold standard for assessing the ischemic potential of an angiographically intermediate coronary stenosis. Procedural cost and time, the need for coronary vessel instrumentation, and the need to administer adenosine to achieve maximal hyperemia remain integral components of invasive fractional flow reserve. The number of new alternatives to fractional flow reserve has proliferated over the last ten years using techniques ranging from alternative pressure wire metrics to anatomic simulation via angiography or intravascular imaging. This review article provides a critical description of the currently available or under-development alternatives to fractional flow reserve with a special focus on the available evidence, pros, and cons for each with a view towards their clinical application in the near future for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease.

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C K L Leung ◽  
L Y Lam ◽  
K Y Li ◽  
A S Y Yu ◽  
M Z Wu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Computational pressure-flow dynamics derived fractional flow reserve (caFFR) is a novel index developed to evaluate the extent of myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), which eliminates the need of invasive pressure guidewire and hyperaemic stimulus in conventional fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement. Studies have shown improved clinical outcomes associated with adherence to functional myocardial ischemia assessment when deciding to perform percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at a per-patient level. However, the clinical significance of such treatment adherence at a per-vessel level remains uncertain. Methods A total of 928 patients (mean age 66.2±10.5, male 72.7%) with stable CAD were included in this study. The caFFR of all three major coronary vessels were obtained for every patient, and the FFR threshold of 0.8 was adopted as the threshold for caFFR to indicate functionally significant artery stenosis which warrants PCI, and vice versa. Based on the caFFR of each major coronary vessel and whether PCI was performed to the respective vessel, patients were stratified into 0–1 vessel with treatment adherence group (group 1) (n=105), 2 vessels with treatment adherence group (group 2) (n=338), and 3 vessels with treatment adherence group (group 3) (n=485). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction and any subsequent revascularization. Results The severity of CAD based on SYNTAX score assessment was 18.6±10.2 in group 1, 14.6±8.9 in group 2, and 11.5±9.9 in group 3 (P<0.001). The rates of MACE at 3 years were significantly different across groups 1, 2 and 3 (17.1% vs. 12.1% vs. 7.4%; P=0.004). With reference to group 3, the risk of MACE at 3 years was increased in group 2 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]=1.597; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.020–2.501; P=0.041), and further increased in group 1 (adjusted HR=1.933; 95% CI=1.081–3.457; P=0.026). Conclusion In stable CAD patients, the risk of MACE is incremental when fewer major coronary vessels are treated with adherence to caFFR threshold of 0.8. Per-vessel treatment adherence significantly affects clinical outcomes in terms of MACE. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.


2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (34) ◽  
pp. 3271-3279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shengxian Tu ◽  
Jelmer Westra ◽  
Julien Adjedj ◽  
Daixin Ding ◽  
Fuyou Liang ◽  
...  

Abstract Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio are the present standard diagnostic methods for invasive assessment of the functional significance of epicardial coronary stenosis. Despite the overall trend towards more physiology-guided revascularization, there remains a gap between guideline recommendations and the clinical adoption of functional evaluation of stenosis severity. A number of image-based approaches have been proposed to compute FFR without the use of pressure wire and induced hyperaemia. In order to better understand these emerging technologies, we sought to highlight the principles, diagnostic performance, clinical applications, practical aspects, and current challenges of computational physiology in the catheterization laboratory. Computational FFR has the potential to expand and facilitate the use of physiology for diagnosis, procedural guidance, and evaluation of therapies, with anticipated impact on resource utilization and patient outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document