Abstract 40: Temporal Trends of SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients without Coronary Artery Disease: A 17-Year Experience from a Tertiary Academic Medical Center

Author(s):  
Hayan Jouni ◽  
J. W Askew ◽  
Daniel J Crusan ◽  
Todd D Miller ◽  
Raymond J Gibbons

Background: Between 1990-2006, there was a tremendous increase in utilization of single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT). Characteristics of the observed increase of SPECT utilization have never been studied. Methods: Using the Mayo Clinic nuclear cardiology database, we examined all SPECT tests performed between 1/1/1991-12/31/2007 in patients without prior coronary artery disease (CAD). Patients with history of CAD, left bundle branch block, paced rhythm, bicycle/ rest-only tests, cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease, and technically unsatisfactory studies were excluded. The study cohort was divided into 4 time periods: 1991-5, 1996-2000, 2001-5, and 2006-7. Results: There were 29255 eligible SPECT tests (mean age 62.4 ± 12y, 54% men). Annual utilization of SPECT studies increased from 682 in 1992 to a peak of 2738 in 2002, and then decreased to 2134 in 2007, Fig 1. There were very modest changes in CAD risk factors over time. Testing of asymptomatic patients nearly doubled (21.9% in 1991-5 to 42.7% in 2006-7). Tests on patients with typical angina decreased dramatically (18.3% in 1991-5 to 5.3% in 2006-7), Fig 2. Summed stress score, summed difference score, and high risk SPECT tests decreased over time, Fig 3. Normal SPECT studies and negative study ECG increased for both pharmacologic and exercise tests. Conclusions: In Mayo Clinic Rochester, annual SPECT utilization in patients without prior CAD increased between 1992 and 2002, but then decreased in advance of national trends. Normal tests increased, while summed stress score, summed difference score, and high risk tests all decreased. These data suggest that SPECT was increasingly utilized in patients with a lower prevalence of CAD.

Author(s):  
Hayan Jouni ◽  
J. W Askew ◽  
Daniel J Crusan ◽  
Todd D Miller ◽  
Raymond J Gibbons

Background: Over the past 20 years, there has been an increasing decline in the prevalence of abnormal stress single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT) studies among patients with no history of coronary artery disease (CAD). The trend of SPECT studies among patients with known CAD has not been evaluated before. Methods: Using the Mayo Clinic nuclear cardiology database, we examined all stress SPECT tests performed between 1/1991-12/2012 in patients with prior history of CAD defined as having prior myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, and/or coronary artery bypass grafting. Patients with left bundle branch block, paced rhythm, bicycle or rest-only tests, cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease, and technically unsatisfactory studies were excluded. The study cohort was divided into 5 time periods: 1991-5, 1996-2000, 2001-5, 2006-10, and 2011-12. Results: There were 19373 eligible SPECT tests (mean age 66.2 ± 10.9y, 75.4% men). Annual utilization of SPECT studies in patients with history of CAD increased from an average of 495 tests per year between 1991-1995 to a peak of 1425 in 2003; and then decreased to 552 tests in 2012. Asymptomatic patients comprised 33% in 1991-1995, peaked at 48% in 2006, and then decreased back to 31% in 2012. Over time, patients with typical angina decreased while patients with dyspnea increased, P <0.001 (Fig 1). The percentage of high risk SPECT tests significantly decreased, and the percentage of low-risk SPECT tests significantly increased despite the overall decline of SPECT utilization between 2003 and 2012. Almost 80% of all tests performed in 2012 had a low risk summed stress score compared to 29% in 1991, P <0.001 (Fig 2). Conclusions: In Mayo Clinic Rochester, annual SPECT utilization in patients with prior CAD increased between 1992 and 2003, but then decreased significantly after 2003. Fewer patients had typical angina while patients with dyspnea increased over time. High risk SPECT tests declined while low risk tests increased dramatically. These data suggest that stress SPECT was being increasingly utilized in CAD patients without typical angina who are at low risk.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-76
Author(s):  
Sharmin Rahman ◽  
Mohammad Simoon Salekin ◽  
Pupree Mutsuddy ◽  
Rezoana Ahmed ◽  
Tasnia Kawser Kanika ◽  
...  

Objectives: Cardiovascular diseases are considered an important cause of mortality & morbidity in many developing countries including Bangladesh. The first step in evaluating a patient with Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) is the clinical assessment of pretest probability. American Heart Association/ American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) guidelines recommend the use of Diamond and Forrester Method (DFM) or Duke Clinical Score (DCS) for calculating Pretest Probability Score (PPS). Myocardial Perfusion study (MPI) can calculate the Summed Stress Score (SSS), an index obtained by adding the individual scores derived from the 17 segments. This study was performed to assess the agreement between the established PPS with SSS so that it can help in risk stratification. Patients and Methods: This cross-sectional observational study was carried out in National Institute of Nuclear Medicine & Allied Science (NINMAS), BSMMU from July 2016 to June 2017. A total of 89 suspected or known CAD patients were included in this study. PPS was calculated by Duke clinical scoring from brief clinical history. SSS was calculated by nuclear medicine software while performing Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI). Statistical analyses were carried out by using the IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0.0 (IBM Corporation Software Group Somers, NY). Pearson correlation and Bland & Altman analyses were applied for assessing correlation and agreement between PPS and SSS. Degree of relation between variables is expressed by ‘r’ (Pearson’s correlation coefficient). Results: The mean of PPS was found 14.73 ± 3.35 and that of SSS was found 16 ± 14.01.  A positive correlation (r=0.108; p=0.312) between PPS and SSS. With Bland and Altman analysis, it was observed that mean difference of PPS and SSS was -1.27 ± 14.045. The limit of agreement ranged from -28.798 to 26.259. There was a positive correlation between PPS and SSS. Mean difference between the two scores was small. The bias between the scores was not significant. The differences within mean ± 1.96 SD were not statistically significant. Conclusion: This study shows PPS and SSS can be used interchangeably. This analysis of agreement between PPS and SSS can further enhance prediction of CAD and upgrade the utilization of SSS for risk stratification in CAD patients, which will influence therapeutic management of the patients and play a major role to reduce cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Bangladesh J. Nuclear Med. 21(2): 73-76, July 2018


2006 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-72
Author(s):  
Jennifer Mieres ◽  
Leslee J Shaw ◽  
Robert C Hendel ◽  
D Douglas Miller ◽  
Robert Bonow ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document