scholarly journals Correction to: Good Clinical Outcome Decreases With Number of Retrieval Attempts in Stroke Thrombectomy: Beyond the First-Pass Effect

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Good Clinical Outcome ◽  
First Pass Effect ◽  
First Pass

Beyond the first pass: revascularization remains critical in stroke thrombectomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1095-1099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaurav Jindal ◽  
Helio De Paula Carvalho ◽  
Aaron Wessell ◽  
Elizabeth Le ◽  
Varun Naragum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Good Clinical Outcome ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
First Pass Effect ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
First Pass ◽  
Scale Scores ◽  
The One ◽  
Number Of Passes

BackgroundThe first pass effect has been recently reported as a predictor of good clinical outcome after stroke thrombectomy. We evaluate the first pass effect on outcome and the influence of revascularization in these and other patients.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database on anterior cerebral circulation stroke thrombectomy cases from April 2012 to April 2018. Data compiled included patient demographics, presenting National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, vessel occlusion site, thrombectomy procedural details, and 90 day modified Rankin Scale scores.Results205 patients were included. The numbers of patients who underwent one, two, three, four, five, and six passes were 69, 70, 55, 9, 1, and 1, respectively. Successful revascularization was achieved in 87%, 83%, and 64% of patients in the one, two, and 3 or more passes groups, respectively (p=0.002). Good functional outcome was inversely correlated with number of passes when comparing the one, two, and three or more passes groups (54%, 43%, 29%; P=0.014). In patients with full revascularization, there was no significant difference in good functional outcomes between the one, two, and three or more passes groups (64%, 65%, 50%; P=0.432). Number of passes was not an independent negative predictor of good clinical outcome (OR 1.66, 95% CI 0.82 to 3.39; P=0.165).ConclusionsFirst pass thrombectomy patients have better functional outcomes compared with beyond-first pass patients. This effect is related at least in part to a higher rate of revascularization in one pass patients. Revascularization beyond the first pass should continue to be the goal of stroke thrombectomy.

True first-pass effect in basilar artery occlusions: First-pass complete reperfusion improves clinical outcome in stroke thrombectomy patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 89 ◽  
pp. 33-38
Author(s):  
N. Abdullayev ◽  
V. Maus ◽  
D. Behme ◽  
U.B. Barnikol ◽  
S. Kutschke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Basilar Artery ◽  
First Pass Effect ◽  
First Pass

Identifying the predictors of first-pass effect and its influence on clinical outcome in the setting of endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: Results from a multicentric prospective registry

2020 ◽  
pp. 174749302092305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Di Maria ◽  
Maéva Kyheng ◽  
Arturo Consoli ◽  
Jean-Philippe Desilles ◽  
Benjamin Gory ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Modified Rankin Scale ◽  
Lower Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Excellent Outcome ◽  
First Pass Effect ◽  
First Pass ◽  
Thrombectomy Device

Background The first-pass effect, defined as a complete or near-complete recanalization after one pass (first-pass effect) of a mechanical thrombectomy device, has been related to better clinical outcome than good recanalization after more than one pass in acute ischemic stroke. We searched for predictors of first-pass effect by analyzing the results within a large prospective multicentric registry. Methods We included patients treated by mechanical thrombectomy for isolated anterior intracranial occlusions. A multi-variate logistic regression analysis was carried out to search for predictors of first-pass effect. We also analyzed the percentage of patients with 90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 2, excellent outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale 0 to 1), 24-h NIHSS change, and 90-day all-cause mortality. Results Among the 1832 patients included, clinical outcome at 90 days was significantly better in first-pass effect patients (50.6% vs. 38.9% in patients without first-pass effect), with a center-adjusted OR associated with first-pass effect of 1.74 (95%CI, 1.24 to 1.77). Older age, a lower systolic blood pressure, an MCA-M1 occlusion, higher DWI-ASPECTS at admission, mechanical thrombectomy under local anesthesia, and combined first-line device strategy were independent predictors of first-pass effect. Conclusions In this study, a strategy combining thrombectomy and thrombo-aspiration was more effective than other strategies in achieving first-pass effect. In addition, we confirm that clinical outcome was better in patients with first-pass effect compared to non-first-pass effect patients.

Comparison of clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic strokes treated with mechanical thrombectomy using either Solumbra or ADAPT techniques

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 1123-1128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josser E Delgado Almandoz ◽  
Yasha Kayan ◽  
Mark L Young ◽  
Jennifer L Fease ◽  
Jill M Scholz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Internal Carotid ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
National Institutes Of Health ◽  
Good Clinical Outcome ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
First Pass ◽  
Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage

PurposeTo compare rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) and good clinical outcome at 90 days in patients with ischemic strokes from anterior circulation emergent large vessel occlusions (ELVO) treated with mechanical thrombectomy using either Solumbra or A Direct Aspiration first-Pass Thrombectomy (ADAPT) techniques.MethodsWe compared clinical characteristics, procedural variables, and clinical outcomes in patients with anterior circulation ELVOs treated with mechanical thrombectomy using either a Solumbra or ADAPT technique at our institution over a 38-month period. SICH was defined using the SITS-MOST criteria. A good clinical outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0–2 at 90 days.ResultsOne hundred patients were included, 55 in the Solumbra group and 45 in the ADAPT group. Patients in the ADAPT group had higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (19.2 vs 16.8, p=0.02) and a higher proportion of internal carotid artery terminus thrombi (42.2% vs 20%, p=0.03) than patients in the Solumbra group. Patients in the ADAPT group had a trend toward a lower rate of SICH than patients in the Solumbra group (2.2% vs 12.7%, p=0.07). Patients in the ADAPT group had a significantly higher rate of good clinical outcome at 90 days than patients in the Solumbra group (55.6% vs 30.9%, p=0.015). Use of the ADAPT technique (OR 6 (95% CI 1.0 to 31.2), p=0.049) was an independent predictor of a good clinical outcome at 90 days in our cohort.ConclusionsIn our cohort, the ADAPT technique was associated with significantly higher good clinical outcomes at 90 days in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation ELVOs treated with mechanical thrombectomy.

Abstract WP40: Balloon Guide Catheter Utilization With Continuous Aspiration Prior to Intracranial Vascular Embolectomy (BGC-CAPTIVE) Associated With Greater Recanalization

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiyi Le ◽  
Mahesh V Jayaraman ◽  
Grayson L Baird ◽  
Brian C Mac Grory ◽  
Tina M Burton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
First Pass Effect ◽  
Guide Catheter ◽  
First Pass

Background: Among thrombectomy techniques, Continuous Aspiration Prior to Intracranial Vascular Embolectomy (CAPTIVE) is associated with higher rates of recanalization. Initially, CAPTIVE was performed without a balloon guide catheter (BGC). We aimed to determine the association between BGC usage with final recanalization as well as first pass effect in patients with anterior circulation emergent large vessel occlusion. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with ICA and M1 occlusions treated with thrombectomy using CAPTIVE over a 45-month period. Post-treatment angiograms were scored by an experienced neurointerventionalist who was blinded to BGC usage and clinical outcome. For both BGC and non-BGC groups, we compared degree of recanalization (using the mTICI 2c scale), first-pass successful recanalization (mTICI 2c/3), and time to recanalization. We examined these results for all patients as well as based on clot location (ICA vs. M1). Results: 357 patients met criteria (median age: 73, median NIHSS: 17) for whom BGC was used in 37/70 (53%) with ICA and 116/287 (40%) with M1 occlusion. Odds of successful reperfusion increased 2.4-fold and odds of complete reperfusion increased 3-fold using BGC (both p<.01). Odds of successful first-pass recanalization (mTICI 2c/3) increased 5-fold for ICA occlusions (p=.004) and 1.7-fold for M1 (p=.03) (See Figure). Recanalization time with BGC for ICA occlusions was faster (22 vs. 36 min, p=.02) but there was no difference in time for M1 occlusions (24 vs. 26 min). Conclusions: BGC usage with the CAPTIVE technique is associated with higher recanalization rates, markedly higher first pass effect (mTICI 2c/3) for both ICA and M1 occlusions, and faster recanalization for ICA occlusions.

scholarly journals First pass effect with contact aspiration and stent retrievers in the Aspiration versus Stent Retriever (ASTER) trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 386-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Célina Ducroux ◽  
Michel Piotin ◽  
Benjamin Gory ◽  
Julien Labreuche ◽  
Raphael Blanc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
Hemorrhagic Transformation ◽  
Stent Retriever ◽  
Complete Revascularization ◽  
Unique Identifier ◽  
First Pass Effect ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
First Pass ◽  
Stent Retrievers

BackgroundThe ‘first pass effect’ (FPE), which was originally described with stent retrievers, designates a (near-)complete revascularization obtained after a single device pass with no rescue therapy, and is associated with improved clinical outcome and decreased mortality.ObjectiveWe report the rate and benefits of FPE in the Aspiration versus Stent Retriever (ASTER) trial.Materials and methodsASTER is a randomized trial comparing angiographic revascularization with the stent retriever (SR) and contact aspiration (CA) thrombectomy techniques, assessed by an external core laboratory using the modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) scale. Rates of FPE (defined by mTICI 2c/3 after a single pass with no rescue therapy) were compared between patients treated with SR and CA techniques. Outcomes were compared between FPE-SR and FPE-CA patients, and between FPE and non-FPE patients.ResultsFPE was achieved in 97/336 patients (28.9%), with no significant difference between SR and CA (respectively 53/169 patients (31.3%) vs 44/167 patients (26.3%), adjusted RR for CA versus SR 0.84, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.31; p=0.44). After prespecified adjustment for allocated arm and randomization stratification factors, FPE in patients was associated with a significantly improved clinical outcome and a decreased mortality, and a significantly lower rate of hemorrhagic transformation and procedural complications than in non-FPE patients.ConclusionIn the ASTER trial, similar rates of FPE were achieved with SR and CA, and FPE was associated with a significantly improved outcome. New techniques and devices to improve the rate of FPE are warranted.Trial registration numberUnique identifier: NCT02523261.

Clot imaging characteristics predict first pass effect of aspiration—first approach to thrombectomy

2021 ◽  
pp. 159101992110191
Author(s):  
Muhammad Waqas ◽  
Weizhe Li ◽  
Tatsat R Patel ◽  
Felix Chin ◽  
Vincent M Tutino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Carotid ◽  
Validation Cohort ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
First Pass Effect ◽  
Imaging Characteristics ◽  
First Pass ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Youden’S Index

Background The value of clot imaging in patients with emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) treated with thrombectomy is unknown. Methods We performed retrospective analysis of clot imaging (clot density, perviousness, length, diameter, distance to the internal carotid artery (ICA) terminus and angle of interaction (AOI) between clot and the aspiration catheter) of consecutive cases of middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion and its association with first pass effect (FPE, TICI 2c-3 after a first attempt). Results Patients ( n = 90 total) with FPE had shorter clot length (9.9 ± 4.5 mm vs. 11.7 ± 4.6 mm, P = 0.07), shorter distance from ICA terminus (11.0 ± 7.1 mm vs. 14.7 ± 9.8 mm, P = 0.048), higher perviousness (39.39 ± 29.5 vs 25.43 ± 17.6, P = 0.006) and larger AOI (153.6 ± 17.6 vs 140.3 ± 23.5, P = 0.004) compared to no-FPE patients. In multivariate analysis, distance from ICA terminus to clot ≤13.5 mm (odds ratio (OR) 11.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.65–46.15, P = 0.001), clot length ≤9.9 mm (OR 7.34; 95% CI 1.8–29.96, P = 0.005), perviousness ≥ 19.9 (OR 2.54, 95% CI 0.84–7.6, P = 0.09) and AOI ≥ 137°^ (OR 6.8, 95% CI 1.55–29.8, P = 0.011) were independent predictors of FPE. The optimal cut off derived using Youden’s index was 6.5. The area under the curve of a score predictive of FPE success was 0.816 (0.728–0.904, P < 0.001). In a validation cohort ( n = 30), sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of a score of 6–10 were 72.7%, 73.6%, 61.5% and 82.3%. Conclusions Clot imaging predicts the likelihood of achieving FPE in patients with MCA ELVO treated with the aspiration-first approach.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Mechanical Thrombectomy using Penumbra ACETM Aspiration Catheter Compared to Stent Retriever SolitaireTM FR in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 504
Author(s):  
Dalibor Sila ◽  
Markus Lenski ◽  
Maria Vojtková ◽  
Mustafa Elgharbawy ◽  
František Charvát ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Binary Logistic Regression ◽  
Stent Retriever ◽  
Good Clinical Outcome ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Aspiration Technique

Background: Mechanical thrombectomy is the standard therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The primary aim of our study was to compare the procedural efficacy of the direct aspiration technique, using Penumbra ACETM aspiration catheter, and the stent retriever technique, with a SolitaireTM FR stent. Secondarily, we investigated treatment-dependent and treatment-independent factors that predict a good clinical outcome. Methods: We analyzed our series of mechanical thrombectomies using a SolitaireTM FR stent and a Penumbra ACETM catheter. The clinical and radiographic data of 76 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Using binary logistic regression, we looked for the predictors of a good clinical outcome. Results: In the Penumbra ACETM group we achieved significantly higher rates of complete vessel recanalization with lower device passage counts, shorter recanalization times, shorter procedure times and shorter fluoroscopy times (p < 0.001) compared to the SolitaireTM FR group. We observed no significant difference in good clinical outcomes (52.4% vs. 56.4%, p = 0.756). Predictors of a good clinical outcome were lower initial NIHSS scores, pial arterial collateralization on admission head CT angiography scan, shorter recanalization times and device passage counts. Conclusions: The aspiration technique using Penumbra ACETM catheter is comparable to the stent retriever technique with SolitaireTM FR regarding clinical outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document