Beyond the first pass: revascularization remains critical in stroke thrombectomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1095-1099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaurav Jindal ◽  
Helio De Paula Carvalho ◽  
Aaron Wessell ◽  
Elizabeth Le ◽  
Varun Naragum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Good Clinical Outcome ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
First Pass Effect ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
First Pass ◽  
Scale Scores ◽  
The One ◽  
Number Of Passes

BackgroundThe first pass effect has been recently reported as a predictor of good clinical outcome after stroke thrombectomy. We evaluate the first pass effect on outcome and the influence of revascularization in these and other patients.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database on anterior cerebral circulation stroke thrombectomy cases from April 2012 to April 2018. Data compiled included patient demographics, presenting National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, vessel occlusion site, thrombectomy procedural details, and 90 day modified Rankin Scale scores.Results205 patients were included. The numbers of patients who underwent one, two, three, four, five, and six passes were 69, 70, 55, 9, 1, and 1, respectively. Successful revascularization was achieved in 87%, 83%, and 64% of patients in the one, two, and 3 or more passes groups, respectively (p=0.002). Good functional outcome was inversely correlated with number of passes when comparing the one, two, and three or more passes groups (54%, 43%, 29%; P=0.014). In patients with full revascularization, there was no significant difference in good functional outcomes between the one, two, and three or more passes groups (64%, 65%, 50%; P=0.432). Number of passes was not an independent negative predictor of good clinical outcome (OR 1.66, 95% CI 0.82 to 3.39; P=0.165).ConclusionsFirst pass thrombectomy patients have better functional outcomes compared with beyond-first pass patients. This effect is related at least in part to a higher rate of revascularization in one pass patients. Revascularization beyond the first pass should continue to be the goal of stroke thrombectomy.

scholarly journals Trevo 6 × 25mm vs. 4 × 30mm in Mechanical Thrombectomy of M1 LVO

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion John Oliver ◽  
Emily Brereton ◽  
Muhib A. Khan ◽  
Alan Davis ◽  
Justin Singer
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
First Pass Effect ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
First Pass ◽  
Stent Retrievers ◽  
Complications And Mortality

Objectives: Our primary objective was to determine the successful rate of recanalization of M1 large vessel occlusion using either the Trevo 4 × 30 mm or 6 × 25 mm stent during mechanical thrombectomy. Our secondary objectives were to determine differences between the use of these two stent retrievers regarding first-pass effect, periprocedural complications, and mortality in the first 90 days.Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. Data regarding the stent used, recanalization, number of passes, periprocedural complications, and mortality were determined via our mechanical thrombectomy database along with chart review.Conclusion: When comparing Trevo 4 × 30 mm to 6 × 25 mm stent retrievers used in mechanical thrombectomy for middle cerebral artery large-vessel occlusion causing stroke, there is no statistically significant difference in successful recanalization rates, first-pass effect, perioperative complications, or mortality at 90 days. Studies like this will hopefully lead to further prospective, randomized controlled trials that will help show experts in the field an additional way to perform this procedure effectively and safely.

Mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute cancer-related stroke: is the stent retriever alone effective?

2020 ◽  
pp. neurintsurg-2020-016144
Author(s):  
Yejin Jeon ◽  
Sung Hyun Baik ◽  
Cheolkyu Jung ◽  
Jun Yup Kim ◽  
Beom Joon Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Stent Retriever ◽  
Hemorrhagic Complication ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
First Line ◽  
Good Clinical Outcome ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
First Pass ◽  
Number Of Passes

BackgroundThe optimal first-line mechanical thrombectomy (MT) method in cancer-related stroke (CRS) patients with emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) remains largely unknown. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety between contact aspiration (CA) first-line thrombectomy and stent retriever (SR) first-line thrombectomy in CRS patients.MethodsSixty-two CRS patients with ELVO, who underwent MT between January 2013 and October 2019 at our institution, were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups based on the first-line MT method and compared: the CA group (n=28), which included those who received CA alone or combined CA with SR, and the SR group (n=34), which included those who received conventional SR alone.ResultsOverall, reperfusion was successful in 75.8% (47/62) of CRS patients, and a good clinical outcome at 90 days was observed in 17.7%. The CA group showed a higher rate of successful reperfusion (89.3% vs 64.7%, P=0.025) shorter procedure time (22 vs 42 min; P=0.029), higher rate of first pass effect (35.7% vs 11.8%, P=0.025), and lower number of passes (1 vs 3, P=0.023) when compared with the SR group. The procedural and hemorrhagic complication rates were similar between the CA and SR groups. The first-line contact aspiration (OR 11.624, 95% CI 1.041 to 129.752; P=0.046) was an independent predictor of successful reperfusion.ConclusionsAmong patients with CRS, CA – whether alone or in combination with SR – as first-line MT seems to provide more rapid and successful reperfusion when compared with SR.

Abstract WP40: Balloon Guide Catheter Utilization With Continuous Aspiration Prior to Intracranial Vascular Embolectomy (BGC-CAPTIVE) Associated With Greater Recanalization

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiyi Le ◽  
Mahesh V Jayaraman ◽  
Grayson L Baird ◽  
Brian C Mac Grory ◽  
Tina M Burton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
First Pass Effect ◽  
Guide Catheter ◽  
First Pass

Background: Among thrombectomy techniques, Continuous Aspiration Prior to Intracranial Vascular Embolectomy (CAPTIVE) is associated with higher rates of recanalization. Initially, CAPTIVE was performed without a balloon guide catheter (BGC). We aimed to determine the association between BGC usage with final recanalization as well as first pass effect in patients with anterior circulation emergent large vessel occlusion. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with ICA and M1 occlusions treated with thrombectomy using CAPTIVE over a 45-month period. Post-treatment angiograms were scored by an experienced neurointerventionalist who was blinded to BGC usage and clinical outcome. For both BGC and non-BGC groups, we compared degree of recanalization (using the mTICI 2c scale), first-pass successful recanalization (mTICI 2c/3), and time to recanalization. We examined these results for all patients as well as based on clot location (ICA vs. M1). Results: 357 patients met criteria (median age: 73, median NIHSS: 17) for whom BGC was used in 37/70 (53%) with ICA and 116/287 (40%) with M1 occlusion. Odds of successful reperfusion increased 2.4-fold and odds of complete reperfusion increased 3-fold using BGC (both p<.01). Odds of successful first-pass recanalization (mTICI 2c/3) increased 5-fold for ICA occlusions (p=.004) and 1.7-fold for M1 (p=.03) (See Figure). Recanalization time with BGC for ICA occlusions was faster (22 vs. 36 min, p=.02) but there was no difference in time for M1 occlusions (24 vs. 26 min). Conclusions: BGC usage with the CAPTIVE technique is associated with higher recanalization rates, markedly higher first pass effect (mTICI 2c/3) for both ICA and M1 occlusions, and faster recanalization for ICA occlusions.

scholarly journals First pass effect with contact aspiration and stent retrievers in the Aspiration versus Stent Retriever (ASTER) trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 386-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Célina Ducroux ◽  
Michel Piotin ◽  
Benjamin Gory ◽  
Julien Labreuche ◽  
Raphael Blanc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
Hemorrhagic Transformation ◽  
Stent Retriever ◽  
Complete Revascularization ◽  
Unique Identifier ◽  
First Pass Effect ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
First Pass ◽  
Stent Retrievers

BackgroundThe ‘first pass effect’ (FPE), which was originally described with stent retrievers, designates a (near-)complete revascularization obtained after a single device pass with no rescue therapy, and is associated with improved clinical outcome and decreased mortality.ObjectiveWe report the rate and benefits of FPE in the Aspiration versus Stent Retriever (ASTER) trial.Materials and methodsASTER is a randomized trial comparing angiographic revascularization with the stent retriever (SR) and contact aspiration (CA) thrombectomy techniques, assessed by an external core laboratory using the modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) scale. Rates of FPE (defined by mTICI 2c/3 after a single pass with no rescue therapy) were compared between patients treated with SR and CA techniques. Outcomes were compared between FPE-SR and FPE-CA patients, and between FPE and non-FPE patients.ResultsFPE was achieved in 97/336 patients (28.9%), with no significant difference between SR and CA (respectively 53/169 patients (31.3%) vs 44/167 patients (26.3%), adjusted RR for CA versus SR 0.84, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.31; p=0.44). After prespecified adjustment for allocated arm and randomization stratification factors, FPE in patients was associated with a significantly improved clinical outcome and a decreased mortality, and a significantly lower rate of hemorrhagic transformation and procedural complications than in non-FPE patients.ConclusionIn the ASTER trial, similar rates of FPE were achieved with SR and CA, and FPE was associated with a significantly improved outcome. New techniques and devices to improve the rate of FPE are warranted.Trial registration numberUnique identifier: NCT02523261.

Abstract P545: First Pass TICI 2b versus Multiple Passes TICI 3 for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients: Is First Pass TICI 2b Enough?

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ameer E Hassan ◽  
Mahmoud Dibas ◽  
Sherief Ghozy ◽  
Amr Ehab El-Qushayri ◽  
Adam A Dmytriw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Single Pass ◽  
First Pass Effect ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
First Pass ◽  
P 16 ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽  
Stroke Center

Background and Objective: Prompt and complete reperfusion with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is essential to improve outcome in acute ischemic strokes (AIS) with large vessel occlusion (LVO). Recently, first-pass effect (FPE), defined as achieving complete reperfusion with a single pass, has been emphasized as a potentially important MT target. We aimed to compare outcomes between patients who achieve mTICI 2b with first pass to those with multiple devise passes (MDP) mTICI 3. Methods: From a single comprehensive stroke center database, we retrospectively grouped LVO pts treated with MT into those who achieved mTICI 2b after a single pass and mTICI 3 after MDP. Clinical outcome (discharge and 90-day mRS), discharge NIHSS and safety (sICH, neurological worsening, mortality) were compared between the two groups. Results: Of 186 pts included, 153 (82%) achieved mTICI 3 with MDP, and 33 (18%) had mTICI 2b after a single pass. Mean age (71 vs 69), NIHSS (17 vs 16, p=0.2) were similar between the two groups. Patients with a single pass mTICI 2b had numerically higher IV tPA administration (33% vs 46%, p=.16). There was no difference in other baseline characteristics. There was no significant difference in discharge (21% vs 24.2%, p=0.65) and 90-day mRS 0-2 (24% vs 24%, p=0.5), MDP mTICI 3 and single pass mTICI 2b, respectively. Also, there was no difference in discharge NIHSS score (13.6 vs 16.7, p=0.26), mortality (16.3% vs 18.2%, p=0.8) and sICH rates (7.8% vs 18.2%, p=0.095) or neurological worsening (76.5% vs 69.7%, p=1). Conclusion: Our results did not show a significant difference between mTICI 3 with multiple passes and mTICI 2b after a single pass. Future large studies are warranted to explore the possibility of extending the first pass effect to patients who achieve mTICI 2b with a single pass.

Clot imaging characteristics predict first pass effect of aspiration—first approach to thrombectomy

2021 ◽  
pp. 159101992110191
Author(s):  
Muhammad Waqas ◽  
Weizhe Li ◽  
Tatsat R Patel ◽  
Felix Chin ◽  
Vincent M Tutino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Carotid ◽  
Validation Cohort ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
First Pass Effect ◽  
Imaging Characteristics ◽  
First Pass ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Youden’S Index

Background The value of clot imaging in patients with emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) treated with thrombectomy is unknown. Methods We performed retrospective analysis of clot imaging (clot density, perviousness, length, diameter, distance to the internal carotid artery (ICA) terminus and angle of interaction (AOI) between clot and the aspiration catheter) of consecutive cases of middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion and its association with first pass effect (FPE, TICI 2c-3 after a first attempt). Results Patients ( n = 90 total) with FPE had shorter clot length (9.9 ± 4.5 mm vs. 11.7 ± 4.6 mm, P = 0.07), shorter distance from ICA terminus (11.0 ± 7.1 mm vs. 14.7 ± 9.8 mm, P = 0.048), higher perviousness (39.39 ± 29.5 vs 25.43 ± 17.6, P = 0.006) and larger AOI (153.6 ± 17.6 vs 140.3 ± 23.5, P = 0.004) compared to no-FPE patients. In multivariate analysis, distance from ICA terminus to clot ≤13.5 mm (odds ratio (OR) 11.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.65–46.15, P = 0.001), clot length ≤9.9 mm (OR 7.34; 95% CI 1.8–29.96, P = 0.005), perviousness ≥ 19.9 (OR 2.54, 95% CI 0.84–7.6, P = 0.09) and AOI ≥ 137°^ (OR 6.8, 95% CI 1.55–29.8, P = 0.011) were independent predictors of FPE. The optimal cut off derived using Youden’s index was 6.5. The area under the curve of a score predictive of FPE success was 0.816 (0.728–0.904, P < 0.001). In a validation cohort ( n = 30), sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of a score of 6–10 were 72.7%, 73.6%, 61.5% and 82.3%. Conclusions Clot imaging predicts the likelihood of achieving FPE in patients with MCA ELVO treated with the aspiration-first approach.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Mechanical Thrombectomy using Penumbra ACETM Aspiration Catheter Compared to Stent Retriever SolitaireTM FR in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 504
Author(s):  
Dalibor Sila ◽  
Markus Lenski ◽  
Maria Vojtková ◽  
Mustafa Elgharbawy ◽  
František Charvát ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Binary Logistic Regression ◽  
Stent Retriever ◽  
Good Clinical Outcome ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Aspiration Technique

Background: Mechanical thrombectomy is the standard therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The primary aim of our study was to compare the procedural efficacy of the direct aspiration technique, using Penumbra ACETM aspiration catheter, and the stent retriever technique, with a SolitaireTM FR stent. Secondarily, we investigated treatment-dependent and treatment-independent factors that predict a good clinical outcome. Methods: We analyzed our series of mechanical thrombectomies using a SolitaireTM FR stent and a Penumbra ACETM catheter. The clinical and radiographic data of 76 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Using binary logistic regression, we looked for the predictors of a good clinical outcome. Results: In the Penumbra ACETM group we achieved significantly higher rates of complete vessel recanalization with lower device passage counts, shorter recanalization times, shorter procedure times and shorter fluoroscopy times (p < 0.001) compared to the SolitaireTM FR group. We observed no significant difference in good clinical outcomes (52.4% vs. 56.4%, p = 0.756). Predictors of a good clinical outcome were lower initial NIHSS scores, pial arterial collateralization on admission head CT angiography scan, shorter recanalization times and device passage counts. Conclusions: The aspiration technique using Penumbra ACETM catheter is comparable to the stent retriever technique with SolitaireTM FR regarding clinical outcomes.

Feasibility and safety of the strategy of first stenting without retrieval using Solitaire FR as a treatment for emergent large-vessel occlusion due to underlying intracranial atherosclerosis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Jong-Hoon Kim ◽  
Young-Jin Jung ◽  
Chul-Hoon Chang
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Intracranial Atherosclerosis ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Stent Retrieval ◽  
First Pass ◽  
Solitaire Fr

OBJECTIVEThe optimal treatment for underlying intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS) in patients with emergent large-vessel occlusion (ELVO) remains unclear. Reocclusion during endovascular treatment (EVT) occurs frequently (57.1%–77.3%) after initial recanalization with stent retriever (SR) thrombectomy in ICAS-related ELVO. This study aimed to compare treatment outcomes of the strategy of first stenting without retrieval (FRESH) using the Solitaire FR versus SR thrombectomy in patients with ICAS-related ELVO.METHODSThe authors retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke and intracranial ELVO of the anterior circulation who underwent EVT between January 2017 and December 2019 at Yeungnam University Medical Center. Large-vessel occlusion (LVO) of the anterior circulation was classified by etiology as follows: 1) no significant stenosis after recanalization (embolic group) and 2) remnant stenosis > 70% or lesser degree of stenosis with a tendency toward reocclusion and/or flow impairment during EVT (ICAS group). The ICAS group was divided into the SR thrombectomy group (SR thrombectomy) and the FRESH group.RESULTSA total of 105 patients (62 men and 43 women; median age 71 years, IQR 62.5–79 years) were included. The embolic, SR thrombectomy, and FRESH groups comprised 66 (62.9%), 26 (24.7%), and 13 (12.4%) patients, respectively. There were no significant differences between the SR thrombectomy and FRESH groups in symptom onset–to-door time, but puncture-to-recanalization time was significantly shorter in the latter group (39 vs 54 minutes, p = 0.032). There were fewer stent retrieval passes but more first-pass recanalizations in the FRESH group (p < 0.001). Favorable functional outcomes were significantly more frequent in the FRESH group (84.6% vs 42.3%, p = 0.017).CONCLUSIONSThis study’s findings suggest that FRESH, rather than rescue stenting, could be a treatment option for ICAS-related ELVO.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document