Abstract 196: Thrombolytic Treatment using Drip and Ship Treatment Paradigm among Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients in the United States: Outcomes and impact on regional thrombolytic utilization and referral patterns

Stroke ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wondwossen G Tekle ◽  
Saqib A Chaudhry ◽  
Habib Qaiser ◽  
Ameer E Hassan ◽  
Gustavo J Rodriguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
The United States ◽  
Thrombolytic Treatment ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Referral Patterns ◽  
Hospital Outcomes ◽  
Treatment Paradigm

Background: While single center and regional estimates of thrombolytic administration using drip and ship treatment paradigm are available, patient outcomes, thrombolytic utilization, cost, and referral patterns has not been assessed in United States. Objective: To provide national estimates of patients treated with thrombolytics using drip and ship paradigm and determine the impact of drip and ship treatment on regional thrombolytic utilization, treatment cost, and referral patterns of acute stroke patients in a large cohort. Methods: We determined the proportion of patients treated with drip and ship paradigm among all acute ischemic stroke patients treated with thrombolytic treatment and obtained comparative in-hospital outcomes from the Nationwide Inpatient Survey (NIS) data files from October 2008 to December 2009. All the in-hospital outcomes were analyzed after adjusting for potential confounders using multivariate analysis. Thrombolytic utilization, hospitalization cost, and patterns of referral related to drip and ship treatment of acute stroke were estimated. Results: Of the 26,814 ischemic stroke patients who received thrombolytic treatment, 5144 (19%) were treated using drip and ship paradigm. Seventy nine percent of all the drip and ship treated patients were referred to urban teaching hospitals for further care, and 7% of them received follow up endovascular treatment at the referral facility. States with higher proportion of patients treated using the drip and ship paradigm had higher rates of thrombolytic utilization (3.1% vs. 2.4%, p<0.001). After adjusting for age, gender, presence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, renal failure, and hospital teaching status, outcomes of patients treated with drip and ship paradigm was similar to those who received thrombolytic and stayed in the same facility: self care (odds ratio [OR], 1.055, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.910-1.224, p=0.4779); death(OR , 0.821 95% CI, 0.619- 1.088, p=0.1688); and nursing home discharge (OR, 1.023, 95% CI, 0.880- 1.189, p=0.7659) at discharge. Drip and ship paradigm was associated with shorter hospital stay (mean [days, SE] 5.9± 0.18 vs. 7.4 ± 0.15, p<0.001), and lower cost of hospitalization (mean total charges [$, SE) 57,000 ± 3,324 vs. 83,000 ± 3,367, p<0.001). Conclusions: One out of every five patients who received thromboytic treatment in United States is currently treated using drip and ship paradigm with comparable adjusted rates of favorable outcomes. There was a higher rates of thrombolytic utilization in States where drip and ship was more commonly implemented.

scholarly journals Drip-and-Ship Thrombolytic Treatment Paradigm Among Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients in the United States

Stroke ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (7) ◽  
pp. 1971-1974 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wondwossen G. Tekle ◽  
Saqib A. Chaudhry ◽  
Ameer E. Hassan ◽  
Gustavo J. Rodriguez ◽  
M. Fareed K. Suri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
The United States ◽  
Thrombolytic Treatment ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Treatment Paradigm

Abstract WP284: National Trends in Utilization and Outcomes of Thrombolytic Use by Drip and Ship Paradigm in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients in United States

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Saqib A Chaudhry ◽  
Mohammad Rauf A Chaudhry ◽  
Mohsain Gill ◽  
Iqra N Akhtar ◽  
Adnan I Qureshi
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
The United States ◽  
Severe Disability ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Model ◽  
Thrombolytic Treatment ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Hospital Outcomes

Background and Purpose: The drip and ship paradigm has rapidly expanded in the last decade allowing higher thrombolytic utilization and endovascular treatment. We performed this analysis to evaluate trends in utilization of drip and ship paradigm in United States and associated outcomes. Methods: We analyzed data for patients admitted with primary diagnosis of ischemic stroke in the United States from Nationwide Inpatient Sample, the largest nationally representative data, for the years 2009 to 2015. We studied changes in utilization of drip-and-ship paradigm and subsequent performance of endovascular treatment, and rates of discharge with none to minimal disability and moderate to severe disability. Results: Of the 3,043,190 patients admitted with ischemic stroke, 56,449 (1.85%) patients received thrombolytic treatment through drip-and-ship paradigm over a 7 year period. Of all patients who received thrombolytic treatment (n=243,824), 56,449 (23.15%) received using drip and ship paradigm. There was almost 3 fold increase in drip and ship paradigm (in 0.98% 2009 to 2.80% in 2015 (test for trend= p < 0.001). Among the patients who underwent drip and ship paradigm, 5,061 (8.97%) underwent endovascular treatment. The rate of endovascular treatment increased from 6.62% to 12.39% among patients treated with drip and ship paradigm (test for trend= p < 0.001). The rate of none minimal disability at discharge increased from 39.93% to 47.08%, (test for trend p < 0.001) while moderate to severe disability decreased 51.22% to 47.08%, (test for trend p < 0.001) in ischemic stroke patients treated using drip-and-ship paradigm. Similar trends were observed for hospital outcomes in multivariate logistic regression model, adjusted for age, gender, medical comorbidities and secondary intracranial hemorrhages. Conclusion: There has been a significant increase in the proportion of acute ischemic stroke patients treated using drip-and-ship paradigm (out of proportion to overall thrombolytic use) with increase in subsequent endovascular treatment in United States. The in hospital outcomes of patients have improved perhaps due to higher utilization of endovascular treatment.

Abstract 45: Thrombolytic Treatment for In-Hospital Ischemic Strokes in United States

Stroke ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tenbit Emiru ◽  
Malik M Adil ◽  
Adnan I Qureshi
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
The United States ◽  
Treated Group ◽  
Hospital Charges ◽  
Thrombolytic Treatment

BACKGROUND: Despite the recent emphasis on protocols for emergent triage and treatment of in-hospital acute ischemic stroke, there is little data on rates and outcomes of patients receiving thrombolytics for in-hospital ischemic strokes. OBJECTIVE: To determine the rates of in-hospital ischemic stroke treated with thrombolytics and to compare outcomes with patients treated with thrombolytics on admission. DESIGN/METHODS: We analyzed a seven-year data (2002-2009) from the National Inpatient Survey (NIS), a nationally representative inpatient database in the United States. We identified patients who had in-hospital ischemic strokes (defined by thrombolytic treatment after one day of hospitalization) and those who received thrombolytics on the admission day. We compared demographics, baseline clinical characteristics, in hospital complications, length of stay, hospitalization charges, and discharge disposition, between the two patient groups. RESULT: A total of 18036 (21.5%) and 65912 (78.5%) patients received thrombolytics for in-hospital and on admission acute ischemic stroke, respectively. In hospital complications such as pneumonia (5.0% vs. 3.4%, p=0.0006), deep venous thrombosis (1.9% vs. 0.6%, p<0.0001) and pulmonary embolism (0.8% vs. 0.4%, p=0.01) were significantly higher in the in-hospital group compared to on admission thrombolytic treated group. Hospital length of stay and mean hospital charges were not different between the two groups. Patients who had in-hospital strokes had had higher rates of in hospital mortality (12.1% vs. 10.6%, p=0.02). In a multivariate analysis, in-hospital thrombolytic treated group had higher in-hospital mortality after adjustment for age, gender and baseline clinical characteristics (odds ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.74-0.95, p=0.008). CONCLUSION/RELEVANCE: In current practice, one out of every five acute ischemic stroke patients treated with thrombolytics is receiving treatment for in-hospital strokes. The higher mortality and complicated hospitalization in such patients needs to be recognized.

Abstract P85: Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on Hospitalizations and Outcomes of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients, Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Program (pcnasp)

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Tong ◽  
Sallyann Coleman King ◽  
Erika Odom ◽  
Quanhe Yang
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Reperfusion Therapy ◽  
The United States ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
National Institutes Of Health ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Stroke Treatment

Introduction: Studies suggest a significant reduction in emergency department visits and hospitalizations for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Few studies have examined AIS hospitalizations, treatments, and outcomes during the pandemic period. The present study compared the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients hospitalized with AIS before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (weeks 11-24 in 2019 vs. 2020). Method: We identified 42,371 admissions with a clinical diagnosis of AIS, from 370 participating hospitals who contributed data during weeks 11-24 in both 2019 and 2020 to the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Program (PCNASP). Results: During weeks 11-24 of the COVID-19 period, AIS hospitalizations declined by 24.5% compared to the same period in 2019 (18,233 in 2020 vs. 24,138 in 2019). In 2020, the percentage of individuals aged <65 years who were hospitalized with AIS was higher compared with the same period in 2019 (34.6% vs. 32.7%, p<0.001); arriving by EMS were higher in 2020 compared with 2019 (47.7% vs. 44.8%, p<0.001). Individuals admitted with AIS in 2020 had a higher mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score compared with 2019 (6.7 vs. 6.3, p<0.001). In 2020, the in-hospital death rates increased by 16% compared to 2019 (5.0% vs. 4.3%, p<0.001). However, there were no differences in rates of alteplase use, achievement of door to needle in 60 minutes, or complications from reperfusion therapy between the two time periods. Conclusion: A higher percentage of younger (<65 years) individuals and more severe AIS cases were admitted to the participating hospitals during weeks 11 to 24 of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 compared to the same period in 2019. The AIS in-hospital death rate increased 16% during the pandemic weeks as compared to the same weeks in 2019. Additional studies are needed to examine the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on stroke treatment and outcomes.

scholarly journals Editorial: Workforce needs for endovascular acute ischemic stroke therapy: myth or reality?

2014 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. E8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harry Cloft
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
The United States ◽  
Stroke Therapy ◽  
Adequate Supply ◽  
Intraarterial Therapy ◽  
Workforce Needs ◽  
Future Demand

The acute ischemic strokes amenable to intraarterial therapy probably number no more than 20,000 per year in the United States. The future demand for intraarterial reperfusion techniques may change, but the fraction of patients who require intraarterial thrombolysis is currently rather low, and the number of neurointerventionists is adequate. Each hospital caring for patients with acute stroke will need to determine its own demand for intraarterial therapy and employ an adequate supply of qualified neurointerventionists available to meet demand. Comprehensive stroke centers are now being designated and hopefully will foster a rational, regionalized approach to the delivery of endovascular therapies for stroke.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document