Abstract 131: MR-based Selection for Endovascular Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke With ICA or MCA Occlusion : Propensity Score Matched Analysis From RESCUE-Japan Registry

Objective: To identify optimal criteria for MR-based endovascular therapy (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke with the internal carotid artery (ICA) or middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion. Materials and methods: From RESCUE-Japan registry, a prospective nation-wide survey of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion, 996 patients diagnosed with ICA or MCA occlusion by initial MRA and assessed with DWI-ASPECTS were included in the present study. We used a propensity score matching method to create a well-balanced cohort to reduce confounding by indication of EVT. Propensity score was calculated using the following variables: sex, age, initial NIHSS score, Onset-to-Door time, DWI-ASPECTS, occluded site on MRA (categorized into four groups, ICA/proximal M1/distal M1/M2 or distal) and IV-tPA. Favorable outcome defined as modified Rankin Scale of 0 to 2 at 90 days after stroke onset was compared between the propensity score-matched groups. Results: Propensity score matching yielded a well-balanced cohort of 528 patients (264 pairs with and without EVT). In this cohort, there was no significant difference in favorable outcome between the patients with and without EVT (33.7% vs 29.2%, OR 1.25, 95% CI 0.855 - 1.81, p=0.25). However, in the subgroup with ICA/proximal M1 occlusion, the patients with EVT more often achieved favorable outcome than the patients without EVT (33.5% vs 17.7%, OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.41 - 3.97), and there was a significant interaction between the cohorts with ICA/proximal M1 occlusion and distal M1/M2 or distal occlusion (p for interaction < 0.001). Further subgroup investigations showed that this effect was concentrated in the patients with NIHSS of 8 to 29 and DWI-ASPECTS of 4 or more (OR 3.28, 95%CI 1.74 - 6.48, p for interaction=0.066). With respect to Onset-to-Door time, optimal threshold was not obtained. Conclusions: MR-based EVT did not show clinical benefit in the overall study population, but significant increase in favorable outcome in the patients with ICA or proximal M1 segment of MCA occlusion. NIHSS of 8 to 29 and DWI-ASPECTS of 4 or more were thought to be optimal thresholds as additional inclusion criteria.

Download Full-text

Abstract 3305: Intensive Lipid-lowering and Early Functional Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.43.suppl_1.a3305 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Woo-Keun Seo ◽

Mi-Yeon Eun ◽

Ji Hyun Kim ◽

Kyungmi Oh ◽

Seong-Beom Koh

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Propensity Score ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Functional Outcome ◽

Propensity Score Matching ◽

Favorable Outcome ◽

Lipid Lowering ◽

Stroke Patients ◽

Early Functional Outcome ◽

Significant Difference

Background This retrospective case-control study was designed to compare the effect of early high-dose atorvastatin treatment on early functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients using propensity score matching (PSM). Study design and population Acute ischemic stroke patients were selected from prospectively collected hospital-based stroke registry. Because the purpose of this study was comparing two treatment strategies for statin treatment, patients with cardioembolic stroke subtype or other-etiology were excluded. Patients were allocated into two groups: Intensive treatment group (atorvastatin 80mg; IT) and conventional treatment group (atorvastatin 10-40mg or other lipid-lowering agent; CT). All the patients were prescribed for aspirin 300mg at admission except for the patients who were considered for thrombolysis. After admission, the patients were prescribed for antithrombotics according to the clinical decision of the attending physician. All other practice guidelines except management of dyslipidemia were followed for previously published guidelines for management of stroke patients. Detailed demographic factors, vascular risk factors, laboratory parameters and vascular imaging were recorded. The end points were composed of two parameters. First, early neurological deterioration (END) defined as 4 points or more deterioration of National Institute of Health Stroke Score (NIHSS) from admission to the seventh hospital day. In case of discharge before the seventh hospital day, NIHSS at discharge was substituted for that of the seventh hospital day. Second, favorable outcome was defined as 0-2 of modified Rankin Score (mRS) measured at 3 months from the onset of stroke. Because baseline characteristics between the groups was supposed to be different, propensity score matching was performed to adjust for potential selection biases and confounding. A logistic regression model was fitted relating treatment strategies (IT and CT) to pretreatment patient characteristics. For the comparison between IT and CT in terms of END and favorable outcome, McNemar test were performed. Results: Among the study population, data of 178 patients for IT and 218 patients for CT were collected. Between the groups, history of previous stroke, TOAST classification, and previous medication of clopidogrel showed significant difference. There was no significant difference of 90-day favorable outcome and END. After PSM, 116 patients for each group were selected. There was no significant difference of baseline characteristics between the groups after PSM. There was no significant difference between IT and CT in terms of 90-day favorable outcome (75.3% in IT and 78.4% in CT, p = 0.457) and END (IT 72.3%, CT 78.6%, p = 0.097). Conclusion In this study, effect of intensive lipid-lowering treatment in acute stroke patients was negligible in terms of early functional outcome.

Download Full-text

Outcomes between in-hospital stroke and community-onset stroke after thrombectomy: Propensity-score matching analysis

Interventional Neuroradiology ◽

10.1177/15910199211030769 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 159101992110307

Author(s):

Kai Qiu ◽

Qing-Quan Zu ◽

Lin-Bo Zhao ◽

Sheng Liu ◽

Hai-Bin Shi

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Propensity Score ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Propensity Score Matching ◽

Symptom Onset ◽

Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽

Number Of Patients ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Stroke Group ◽

Community Onset

Background The benefit of endovascular thrombectomy for patients with in-hospital stroke remains unclear. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the endovascular thrombectomy outcomes between in-hospital stroke and community-onset stroke among patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods From January 2015 to July 2019, 362 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation received endovascular thrombectomy in our centre. After propensity score matching with a ratio of 1:2 (in-hospital stroke:community-onset stroke), clinical characteristics and functional outcomes were compared between in-hospital stroke and community-onset stroke groups. Results Thirty-six patients with in-hospital stroke and 72 patients with community-onset stroke were enrolled. The number of patients with New York Heart Association classification III/IV (41.7% vs. 6.9%, p < 0.001) and with underlying cancer (25.0% vs. 2.8%, p < 0.001) was higher in the in-hospital stroke than in the community-onset stroke group. The intravenous thrombolysis rate was lower in the in-hospital stroke group (13.9% vs. 43.1%, p = 0.002). No significant difference in symptom onset to puncture ( p = 0.618), symptom onset to recanalisation ( p = 0.618) or good reperfusion (modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction ≥2 b) rates ( p = 0.852) was found between the groups. The favourable clinical outcome trend (modified Rankin scale ≤2 at 90 days) was inferior, but acceptable, in the in-hospital stroke, group compared to the community-onset stroke group (30.6% vs. 41.7%, p = 0.262). Conclusion Patients with in-hospital stroke had more disadvantageous comorbidities than those with community-onset stroke. Cardiac dysfunction seems to be associated with poor outcomes after thrombectomy. Nevertheless, endovascular thrombectomy still appears to be safe and effective for patients with in-hospital stroke.

Download Full-text

Can Tirofiban Improve the Outcome of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Frontiers in Neurology ◽

10.3389/fneur.2021.688019 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 12 ◽

Author(s):

Lingxin Cai ◽

Xiaobo Yu ◽

Jun Yu ◽

Jing Xu ◽

Liang Xu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Propensity Score ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Propensity Score Matching ◽

Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽

Subgroup Analysis ◽

Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis ◽

Favorable Outcome ◽

Large Artery ◽

Efficacy And Safety

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tirofiban for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS), especially posterior circulation stroke (PCS).Methods: We enrolled consecutive patients with AIS who suffered large artery occlusion (LAO) and underwent mechanical thrombectomy (MT) between January 2016 and May 2020. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether tirofiban was used during MT. The primary efficacy outcome was a favorable functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0–2 at 3 months. The safety outcomes were the rate of mortality at 3 months and the presence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Cohorts were balanced using 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Subgroup analysis was further performed to compare the efficacy and safety of tirofiban between the anterior circulation stroke (ACS) and PCS groups.Results: A total of 292 patients were eligible for this study and divided into the tirofiban group (n = 51) and the no-tirofiban group (n = 241). In the propensity-score-matched cohort, the tirofiban group had a higher rate of favorable outcomes than the no-tirofiban group (49.0 vs. 25.5%, p = 0.014), and the mortality at 3 months showed a greater downward trend in the tirofiban group than the no-tirofiban group (15.6 vs. 33.3% p = 0.064). The risk of sICH and ICH was the same between the tirofiban and control groups (17.6 vs. 27.4% p = 0.236, 31.3 vs. 45.1% p = 0.154, respectively). Tirofiban use was predictive of favorable outcomes [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52–6.44, p = 0.043] after multiple logistic regression analysis. Subgroup analysis revealed that tirofiban use was significantly associated with favorable outcomes in ACS (aOR = 3.66, 95% CI 1.24–5.22, p = 0.019) but not in PCS (aOR = 1.12, 95% CI 0.47–7.52, p = 0.570).Conclusion: We demonstrated that tirofiban may be associated with improving favorable outcome for the AIS patients who underwent MT, without increasing ICH or sICH. Furthermore, our results indicated that for PCS patients tirofiban may not be associated with favorable outcome, and more comprehensive randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this finding.

Download Full-text

Intraarterial Versus Intravenous Tirofiban as an Adjunct to Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Stroke ◽

10.1161/strokeaha.120.029994 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 51 (10) ◽

pp. 2925-2933

Author(s):

Jianhong Yang ◽

Yuefei Wu ◽

Xiang Gao ◽

Andrew Bivard ◽

Christopher R. Levi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Propensity Score ◽

Intracerebral Hemorrhage ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Propensity Score Matching ◽

Death Rate ◽

Hospital Death ◽

Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽

Symptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage ◽

Significant Difference

Background and Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the treatment effect of intraarterial versus intravenous tirofiban during endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. Methods: This study retrospectively examined 503 patients with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion who received endovascular thrombectomy within 24 hours of stroke onset. Patients were divided into 3 groups: no tirofiban (n=354), intraarterial tirofiban (n=79), and intravenous tirofiban (n=70). The 3 groups were compared in terms of recanalization rate, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, in-hospital death rate, 3-month death, and 3-month outcomes measured by modified Rankin Scale score (good clinical outcome of 0–2, poor outcome of 5–6). The comparison was statistically assessed by propensity score matching, followed by Freidman rank-sum test and pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction. Results: The propensity score matching resulted in 92 matched triplets. Compared with the no-tirofiban group, the intravenous tirofiban group showed significantly increased recanalization (96.7% versus 64.1%, P <0.001), an increased rate of 3-month good outcome (69.5% versus 51.2%, P =0.034), and a lower rate of 3-month poor outcome (12.2% versus 41.4%, P <0.001). There was no significant difference between the tirofiban intravenous and no-tirofiban groups in terms of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (2.2% versus 0%, P =1.000). However, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was significantly increased in the intraarterial-tirofiban group compared with the no-tirofiban group (19.1% versus 0%, P <0.001), with an increased rate of in-hospital death (23.6% versus 0% P <0.001), and increased rate of 3-month death (26.8% versus 11.1%, P =0.021). The intraarterial-tirofiban and no-tirofiban group showed no significant difference in recanalization rate (66.3% versus 64.1%, P =1.000). Conclusions: As an adjunct to endovascular thrombectomy, intravenous tirofiban is associated with high recanalization rate and good outcome, whereas intraarterial tirofiban is associated with high hemorrhagic rate and death rate.

Download Full-text

Thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: Experience from a tertiary care centre in India

Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice ◽

10.4103/0976-3147.127867 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 5 (01) ◽

pp. 25-30 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Vikram Huded ◽

Romnesh De Souza ◽

Rajesh Karalumangala Nagarajaiah ◽

Syed Moeed Zafer ◽

Rithesh Nair ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Endovascular Treatment ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Endovascular Therapy ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Disease ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Large Vessel Disease

ABSTRACTThe management of acute ischemic stroke has undergone a sea of change with the introduction of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Current guidelines state that the window period for IVT using rTPA is 4.5 hours. The MERCI, Multi Merci, and Penumbra trials in which patients with acute ischemic stroke were treated using endovascular treatment demonstrated better recanalisation in patients having a large vessel occlusion. However, recently published data from the three large trials IMS 3, Synthesis Expansion, and MR rescue, which compared endovascular treatment with intravenous therapy, failed to demonstrate superiority of endovascular treatment over IVT. In these trials, stent retrievers were used in very few patients. We present our results from a tertiary care center in India where patients are treated using intravenous as well as endovascular modalities. Among the 53 patients with acute ischemic stroke treated between 2010 and 2012, 23 were treated with IVT and 30 with endovascular methods. Stent retriever was used in majority of the endovascular cases. Aims: To compare the outcomes of acute ischemic stroke patients treated with IVT versus those who were managed using endovascular therapy. To evaluate outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke with a large vessel occlusion in whom endovascular modalities were used and to compare them with those of patients who were treated with IVT in presence of a large vessel occlusion. Settings and Design: Data of patients who underwent thrombolysis at our centre was collected over a 3-year period, that is, from 2010 to 2012. Endovascular treatment was done by an interventional neurologist. Materials and Methods: Data of patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent IVT or endovascular treatment at our centre between 2010 and 2012 was analyzed. Parameters included age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) on admission, door to needle time, stroke subtype, modality of treatment, outcome based on modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score at 90 days follow up and mortality rates at 90 days. Statistical Analysis: Tabulated results were analysed using INSTAT Graphpad analyser. Data were analysed using paired and unpaired t-test, Chi-square test, and Fishers test as applicable. P value was considered significant when it was <0.05. Results: Upon comparison of the outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel disease treated with endovascular therapy with those treated with IVT, it was found that the former group had better outcomes. We also found that in spite of there being a significant difference in the NIHSS on admission and a significant difference in the door to needle time, the outcomes of patients treated using intravenous or endovascular therapy were similar. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality rates between intravenous and endovascular groups. Conclusions: IVT is currently the standard of care in the management of acute ischemic stroke. Endovascular treatment during the window period is reserved for those patients with contraindication to IVT. In this study, we found that patients with documented large vessel disease with no evidence of cross flow through Willisian collaterals benefit from endovascular treatment. We recommend that all patients of acute ischemic stroke, be subjected to a baseline angiogram either computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to document vessel status. This will help in identifying patients who may benefit from early endovascular treatment, if they fail to improve with IVT. Further, large trials using stent retrievers are needed, to prove that endovascular treatment is superior to IVT, in presence of documented large vessel disease.

Download Full-text

Abstract 3314: The Role of Bridging with Intravenous Thrombolysis in Endovascular Therapy of Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.43.suppl_1.a3314 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Omar Kass-Hout ◽

Tareq Kass-Hout ◽

Maxim Mokin ◽

David Orion ◽

Shadi Jahshan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Endovascular Treatment ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Endovascular Therapy ◽

Combined Therapy ◽

Large Vessel ◽

P Value ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Nihss Score

Background: Large vessel occlusions with a high clot burden are less likely to improve with the FDA-approved IV strategy. Endovascular therapy within the first 3 h of stroke symptom onset provides an effective alternative treatment in patients with large vessel occlusion. It is not clear if combination of IV thrombolysis and endovascular approach is superior to endovascular treatment alone. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all cases of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion treated within the first 3 h stroke onset during the 2005-2010 period. First group received endovascular therapy within the first 3 h of stroke onset. Second group consisted of patients who received IV thrombolysis within the first 3 h followed by endovascular therapy. We compared the following outcomes: revascularization rates, NIHSS score at discharge, mRS at discharge and 3months, symptomatic hemorrhage rates and mortality. Results: Among 104 patients identified, 42 received combined therapy, and 62 received endovascular therapy only. The two groups had similar demographic (age and sex distribution) and vascular risk factors distribution, as well as NIHSS score on admission (14.8±4.7 and 16.0±5.3; p=0.23). We found no difference in TIMI recanalization rates (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction scale score of 2 or 3) following combined or endovascular therapy alone (83.3% and 79.0%; p=0.59). A preferred outcome, defined as a mRS of 2 or less at 90 days also did not differ between the combined therapy group and the endovascular only group (37.5% and 34.5%; p=0.76). There was no difference in mortality rate (22.5% and 31.0%; p=0.36) and the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (9.5% and 8.1%; p=0.73). There was a significant difference in mean time from symptom onset to endovascular treatment between the combined group (227±88 min) and endovascular only group (125±40 min; p<0.0001).Patients with good TIMI recanalization rate of 2 or 3 showed a trend of having a better mRS at 90 days in both bridging (16.67% vs. 41.18%, p-value: 0.3813) and endovascular groups (25% vs. 34.78%, p-value: 0.7326).When analyzing the correlation of mRS at 90 days with the site of occlusion, patients in the bridging group showed a trend of a better outcome when the site of occlusion was ICA (33.3% vs 30%) and MCA (66.67% vs. 27.59%) and worse outcome when the site of occlusion was in the posterior circulation (26.32% vs. 50%), however, these results were not statistically significant (p-values: 0.1735& 0.5366). Conclusion: Combining IV thrombolysis and endovascular therapy achieves similar rates of clinical outcomes, revascularization rates, complications and mortality rates, when compared with endovascular treatment alone. The combined therapy, however, significantly delays initiation of endovascular treatment. A randomized prospective trial comparing both treatment strategies in acute ischemic stroke is warranted

Download Full-text

Abstract WMP17: Computerized Tomography Perfusion to Characterize Lack of Clinical Improvement After Recanalization in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.51.suppl_1.wmp17 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Alvaro Garcia-Tornel ◽

Marta Olive-Gadea ◽

Marc Ribo ◽

David Rodriguez-Luna ◽

Jorge Pagola ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Functional Outcome ◽

Infarct Volume ◽

Significant Proportion ◽

Hemorrhagic Transformation ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Clinical Recovery ◽

Good Functional Outcome ◽

Significant Difference

A significant proportion of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) present poor functional outcome despite recanalization. We aim to investigate computed tomography perfusion (CTP) patterns after EVT and their association with outcome Methods: Prospective study of anterior large vessel occlusion AIS patients who achieved complete recanalization (defined as modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia (TICI) 2b - 3) after EVT. CTP was performed within 30 minutes post-EVT recanalization (POST-CTP): hypoperfusion was defined as volume of time to maximal arrival of contrast (Tmax) delay ≥6 seconds in the affected territory. Hyperperfusion was defined as visual increase in cerebral blood flow (CBF) and volume (CBV) with advanced Tmax compared with the unaffected hemisphere. Dramatic clinical recovery (DCR) was defined as a decrease of ≥8 points in NIHSS score at 24h or NIHSS≤2 and good functional outcome by mRS ≤2 at 3 months. Results: One-hundred and forty-one patients were included. 49 (34.7%) patients did not have any perfusion abnormality on POST-CTP, 60 (42.5%) showed hypoperfusion (median volume Tmax≥6s 17.5cc, IQR 6-45cc) and 32 (22.8%) hyperperfusion. DCR appeared in 56% of patients and good functional outcome in 55.3%. Post-EVT hypoperfusion was related with worse final TICI, and associated worse early clinical evolution, larger final infarct volume (p<0.01 for all) and was an independent predictor of functional outcome (OR 0.98, CI 0.97-0.99, p=0.01). Furthermore, POST-CTP identified patients with delayed improvement: in patients without DCR (n=62, 44%), there was a significant difference in post-EVT hypoperfusion volume according to functional outcome (hypoperfusion volume of 2cc in good outcome vs 11cc in poor outcome, OR 0.97 CI 0.93-0.99, p=0.04), adjusted by confounding factors. Hyperperfusion was not associated with worse outcome (p=0.45) nor symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation (p=0.55). Conclusion: Hypoperfusion volume after EVT is an accurate predictor of functional outcome. In patients without dramatic clinical recovery, hypoperfusion predicts good functional outcome and defines a “stunned-brain” pattern. POST-CTP may help to select EVT patients for additional therapies.

Download Full-text

Abstract TP43: Is Unintended Hypothermia After Endovascular Therapy Associated With Improved Functional Outcome of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke?

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.51.suppl_1.tp43 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Christian Hartmann ◽

Simon Winzer ◽

Timo Siepmann ◽

Lars-Peder Pallesen ◽

Alexandra Prakapenia ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Functional Outcome ◽

Endovascular Therapy ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Anterior Circulation ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Good Outcome ◽

Risk Ratios

Introduction: Hypothermia may be neuroprotective in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (acLVO) who receive endovascular therapy (EVT) are frequently hypothermic after the procedure. We sought to analyze whether this unintended hypothermia was associated with improved functional outcome. Methods: We extracted data of consecutive patients (01/2016-04/2019) from our prospective EVT database that includes all patients screened for EVT at our center. We included patients with acLVO who received EVT and analyzed recanalization (mTICI 2b-3) and complications (i.e., pneumonia, bradyarrhythmia, venous thromboembolism) during the hospital course. We assessed functional outcome at 3 months and analyzed risk ratios (RR) for good outcome (mRS scores 0-2) and mortality of patients who were hypothermic (<36°C) compared to patients who were normothermic ( > 36°C) after EVT. We compared the frequency of complications and calculated RRs for good outcome and mortality in the subgroup with recanalization. Results: Among 674 patients with anterior circulation ischemic stroke, 372 patients received EVT for acLVO (178 [47%] male, age 77 years [65-82], NIHSS score 16 [12 - 20]). Of these, 186 patients (50%) were hypothermic (median [IQR] temperature 35.2°C [34.7-35.6]) and 186 patients were normothermic (media temperature 36.4 [36.2-36.8]) after EVT. At 3 months, 54 of 186 (29.0%) hypothermic patients compared with 65 of 186 (35.0%) normothermic patients had a good outcome (RR, 0.83; 95%CI 0.62-1.12) and 52 of 186 (27.9%) hypothermic patients compared with 46 of 186 (24.7%) normothermic patients had died (RR, 1.13; 95%CI 0.8-1.59). This relation was consistent in 307 patients (82.5% of all EVTs) with successful recanalization (good outcome: RR, 0.85; 95%CI 0.63-1.14.; mortality: RR, 1.05; 95%CI 0.7-1.57). More hypothermic patients suffered pneumonia (37.8% vs. 24.7%; p=0.003) or bradyarrhythmia (55.6% vs. 18.3%; p<0.001). Venous thromboembolism was distributed similarly (5.4% vs. 6.5%; p=0.42). Conclusion: Unintended hypothermia following EVT for acLVO was not associated with improved functional outcome or reduced mortality but an increased complication rate in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Download Full-text

Abstract WP1: Thrombectomy Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke due to Middle Cerebral Artery M2 Occlusion with Stent-Retriever, Aspiration, MERCI: Multi-Center Experience

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.48.suppl_1.wp1 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Kunakorn Atchaneeyasakul ◽

Amer M Malik ◽

Dileep R Yavagal ◽

Mehdi Bouslama ◽

Diogo C Haussen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Middle Cerebral Artery ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Cerebral Artery ◽

Tertiary Care ◽

Stent Retriever ◽

Anterior Circulation ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Symptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage ◽

Significant Difference

Introduction: Recent trials demonstrated that mechanical thrombectomy improve functional outcome in anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1 segment. However, such data regarding AIS due to MCA M2 segment ELVO is limited. Analysis of the STAR, SWIFT, and SWIFT-PRIME trials found thrombectomy in MCA M2 occlusion to be feasible in achieving successful reperfusion. The most optimal technique and/or device used for such reperfusion is not clearly defined. We aim to compare the outcome for the contemporary techniques and devices used for thrombectomy of AIS patients due to MCA M2 ELVO. Methods: A retrospective review of AIS patients with MCA M2 ELVO receiving thrombectomy from three tertiary care academic medical centers was conducted. Thrombectomy technique and thrombectomy device utilized were recorded. Outcomes were successful angiographic reperfusion (TICI ≥2b), favorable modified Rankin Scale (mRS≤2) at discharge and at 90 days, and rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). Results: From October 1999 through June 2016, 253 AIS patients underwent thrombectomy for MCA M2 ELVO. Thrombectomy methods utilized were Stent-retriever (n=118), Aspiration only [manual or Penumbra device] (n=83), and MERCI retriever (n=52). Table 1 shows rate of outcomes measured. There was no difference in baseline NIHSS or in stroke onset to groin puncture time. Stent-retriever group showed a significantly higher recanalization rate, lower sICH rate, and favorable 90-day mRS versus Aspiration group or MERCI group, respectively. No significant difference was seen in discharge mRS between the groups. Conclusions: Thrombectomy for AIS patients with MCA M2 ELVO with Stent-retriever appears to be feasible with a significantly higher rate of recanalization, lower sICH rate, and favorable 90-day mRS when compared to Aspiration and MERCI.

Download Full-text