scholarly journals Comment on "Reproducibility and Replication of Experimental Particle Physics Results"

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Fowlie
1987 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 115-115
Author(s):  
P D B Collins

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.V. Ezhela ◽  
B.B. Filimonov ◽  
S.B. Lugovsky

2021 ◽  
pp. 19-36
Author(s):  
Talia Dan-Cohen

This chapter looks at Sharon Traweek's classic study of physicists, which tracks the way the experimental particle physics community reproduces itself through the training of novices. It identifies the patterns through which education and inculcation occur, and by which particle physicists learn the criteria for a successful career. It also examines the images Traweek conveys of community, stability, and gendered reproduction that can be discerned only within a sufficiently entrenched discipline. The chapter describes synthetic biology as an unstable and ambiguously bounded field in which idiosyncratic individual paths are figured prominently, especially for members of the first generation of practitioners whose training took place within the reproductive mechanisms of established disciplines. It explores paths that are embedded with different concepts and logics within the synthetic organisms that were made in different labs.


2008 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 508-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Bodnarczuk ◽  
Lillian Hoddeson

During the 1970s and 1980s, the experimental particle physicists at large laboratories responded to the limited funding context of that time. Unlike the "big science" in the postwar decades, when funding for research appeared unlimited and many parameters grew exponentially, the even larger-scale "megascience" of the 1970s and on was shaped by competition for limited resources at host laboratories. Experimental programs increasingly took the form of long-lived (typically ten- to twenty-year) strings of related experiments, invisible institutions creating research traditions within the laboratory. Focusing on how a particular study of charmed particles (experiment E-516) at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory gave rise to one of the laboratory's earliest experiment strings (E-516-691-769-791), we explore why such strings evolved and how they led to new research practices. Because these strings produced conflicts and ironies that threatened to undermine fundamental aspects of the research, the emergence of experiment strings can be viewed as a limiting process of large-scale research in the 1970s and 1980s.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document