scholarly journals Government Spending Composition, Technical Change, and Wage Inequality

2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 1325-1358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guido Cozzi ◽  
Giammario Impullitti
2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 457-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuela Magalhães ◽  
Tiago Sequeira ◽  
Óscar Afonso

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathaniel Baum-Snow ◽  
Matthew Freedman ◽  
Ronni Pavan

This paper examines mechanisms driving the more rapid increases in wage inequality in larger cities between 1980 and 2007. Production function estimates indicate strong evidence of capital–skill complementarity and increases in the skill bias of agglomeration economies in the context of rapid skill-biased technical change. Immigration shocks are the source of identifying variation across cities in changes to the relative supply of skilled versus unskilled labor. Estimates indicate that changes in the factor biases of agglomeration economies rationalize at least 80 percent of the more rapid increases in wage inequality in larger cities. (JEL J24, J31, O33, R23)


2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 419-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jørn Rattsø ◽  
Hildegunn E. Stokke

2015 ◽  
Vol 105 (10) ◽  
pp. 3061-3101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurence Ales ◽  
Musab Kurnaz ◽  
Christopher Sleet

This paper considers the normative implications of technical change for tax policy design. A task-to-talent assignment model of the labor market is embedded into an optimal tax problem. Technical change modifies equilibrium wage growth across talents and the substitutability of talents across tasks. The overall optimal policy response is to reduce marginal income taxes on low to middle incomes, while raising those on middle to high incomes. The reform favors those in the middle of the income distribution, reducing their average taxes while lowering transfers to those at the bottom. (JEL D31, H21, H23, H24, J31, O33)


2008 ◽  
pp. 12
Author(s):  
Arnaud Dupuy

This article reviews the literature on two-sided atomless assignment models of workers to tasks. Using simple parametric examples, the fundamental differences between the comparative-advantage and the scale-of-operations models are illustrated. Holding the distributions of abilities and tasks and the production function of worker-task pairs constant, the two principles are shown to produce different wage distributions and wage inequality. These models are useful to evaluate the general equilibrium effect of technical change on the wage structure. In all models, Skill Biased Technical Change that impacts the production function of worker-task pairs leads to rising wage inequality.


2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Óscar Afonso

Abstract We develop a two country, Innovator and Follower, directed technical change model between tradable and nontradable sectors. The Innovator performs innovative R&D. The Follower imitates, in a pre-trade context, and adopts, in a trade scenario, the available technological knowledge. We start by considering the pre-trade context and then we analyze the trade scenario. In both regimes – imitation and adoption – and in BGP, international IPRs protection, R&D productivity, scale-effects intensity and substitutability between sectors determine the stable and unique worldwide economic growth rate and the technological-knowledge bias, which, in turn, affects relative prices and wages. Depending on IPRs protection, imitation and adoption can either amplify or slow down the technological-knowledge bias and thus the real exchange rate, the wage inequality and the worldwide growth rate. For example, under technological-knowledge adoption with positive international IPRs protection and substitutability, wages tend to be higher in the Innovator, technological knowledge and intra-country wage inequality are biased towards the tradable sector, and the real exchange rate accommodates the Balassa-Samuelson proposal.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document