The Human Thalamus is Crucially Involved in Executive Control Operations

2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 1903-1914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Marzinzik ◽  
Michael Wahl ◽  
Gerd-Helge Schneider ◽  
Andreas Kupsch ◽  
Gabriel Curio ◽  
...  

The processing of executive control is thought to involve cortical as well as thalamic brain areas. However, the questions of how thalamic structures contribute to the control of behavior and how cortical versus thalamic processing is coordinated remain to be settled. We therefore aimed at specifying respective activations during the performance of a go/no-go task. To this end, an electroencephalogram was recorded simultaneously from scalp and thalamic electrodes in seven patients undergoing deep brain stimulation. Meanwhile, left- or right-directed precues were presented indicating with which index finger a button press should be putatively executed. Thereafter, 2 sec elapsed until a go or no-go stimulus determined if the prepared movement had to be performed or withheld. In fronto-central scalp as well as in thalamic recordings, event-related potentials upon go versus no-go instructions were expressed differentially. This task effect was unrelated to motor processes and emerged significantly prior at thalamic than at scalp level. Amplitude fluctuations of depth and scalp responses showed site- and task-dependent correlations, particularly between thalamic and no-go-related activities at frontal recording sites. We conclude that an early classification of go and no-go instructions is performed already thalamically. It further appears that this information is subsequently utilized by cortical areas engaged in the definite inhibition of the prepared action.

1994 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 1246-1255 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Bloch-Salisbury ◽  
A. Harver

Resistive and elastic loads added to inspiration are readily detected, and detection latencies vary as a function of load magnitude and load type. In the present study, we recorded endogenous event-related potentials (i.e., N2 and P3) to the detection and classification of large (15.0 cmH2O.1–1.s and 70.0 cmH2O/l) and small (1.45 cmH2O.1–1.s and 19.0 cmH2O/l) loads equated for subjective magnitude in 14 men (mean age 21.14 yr). In blocks of trials comprised of either large or small loads, subjects made a button-press response upon detecting a load and then classified the load as resistive or elastic. Loads were presented briefly (for approximately 200 ms) early in inspiration and at the same level of inspiratory pressure. For loads of comparable magnitude, subjects detected equivalent numbers of resistive and elastic loads but could not discriminate reliably between load types. On the other hand, the latency of N2 was shorter to larger than to smaller loads, to resistive than to elastic loads, and to correct than to incorrect load classifications. The latency of P3 was affected similarly by load magnitude and load type. These findings demonstrate that event-related potentials are elicited by brief presentations of resistive and elastic loads and that N2 and P3 latencies vary reliably as a function of load magnitude and load type. Most importantly, event-related potential latencies are sensitive to load type and to classification accuracy even when resistive and elastic loads are not distinguishable subjectively.


2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. 866-871 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi-Hua HUANG ◽  
Ming-Hong LI ◽  
Yuan-Ye MA ◽  
Chang-Le ZHOU

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 292-301
Author(s):  
C. Papaodysseus ◽  
S. Zannos ◽  
F. Giannopoulos ◽  
D. Arabadjis ◽  
P. Rousopoulos ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 294-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. R. Daffner ◽  
L. F. M. Scinto ◽  
A. M. Weitzman ◽  
R. Faust ◽  
D. M. Rentz ◽  
...  

Despite the important role that attending to novel events plays in human behavior, there is limited information about the neuroanatomical underpinnings of this vital activity. This study investigated the relative contributions of the frontal and posterior parietal lobes to the differential processing of novel and target stimuli under an experimental condition in which subjects actively directed attention to novel events. Event-related potentials were recorded from well-matched frontal patients, parietal patients, and non-brain-injured subjects who controlled their viewing duration (by button press) of line drawings that included a frequent, repetitive background stimulus, an infrequent target stimulus, and infrequent, novel visual stimuli. Subjects also responded to target stimuli by pressing a foot pedal. Damage to the frontal cortex resulted in a much greater disruption of response to novel stimuli than to designated targets. Frontal patients exhibited a widely distributed, profound reduction of the novelty P3 response and a marked diminution of the viewing duration of novel events. In contrast, damage to posterior parietal lobes was associated with a substantial reduction of both target P3 and novelty P3 amplitude; however, there was less disruption of the processing of novel than of target stimuli. We conclude that two nodes of the neuroanatomical network for responding to and processing novelty are the prefrontal and posterior parietal regions, which participate in the voluntary allocation of attention to novel events. Injury to this network is indexed by reduced novelty P3 amplitude, which is tightly associated with diminished attention to novel stimuli. The prefrontal cortex may serve as the central node in determining the allocation of attentional resources to novel events, whereas the posterior parietal lobe may provide the neural substrate for the dynamic process of updating one's internal model of the environment to take into account a novel event.


NeuroImage ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 514-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres H. Neuhaus ◽  
Florin C. Popescu ◽  
Cristian Grozea ◽  
Eric Hahn ◽  
Constanze Hahn ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document