Iridescent blue and orange components contribute to the recognition of a multicomponent warning signal

Behaviour ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 150 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 321-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly V. Pegram ◽  
Melissa J. Lillo ◽  
Ronald L. Rutowski

Warning colouration functions to deter predators from attacking unprofitable (e.g., unpalatable or toxic) prey items. While warning colours are often characterized by long-wavelength components (e.g., orange, red or yellow), many distasteful animals across the animal kingdom display orange or red colour patches adjacent to or within a field of short-wavelength colouration such as blue (e.g., strawberry poison dart frogs, pipevine swallowtail and pyjama nudibranch), which yields a multicomponent visual warning signal. Here we show that, in such signals, blue and orange patches can function as redundant signal components; avian predators trained not to attack the intact blue and orange colouration of the pipevine swallowtail (Battus philenor) recognised the butterflies as distasteful even when the blue and orange were presented individually. Our results demonstrate that blue colouration and potential multiple, unimodal, signal components should be considered in research on visual warning signals, including in well-studied animals, such as dendrobatid frogs and swallowtail butterflies.

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 20140533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig A. Barnett ◽  
Melissa Bateson ◽  
Candy Rowe

Toxic prey that signal their defences to predators using conspicuous warning signals are called ‘aposematic’. Predators learn about the toxic content of aposematic prey and reduce their attacks on them. However, through regulating their toxin intake, predators will include aposematic prey in their diets when the benefits of gaining the nutrients they contain outweigh the costs of ingesting the prey's toxins. Predators face a problem when managing their toxin intake: prey sharing the same warning signal often vary in their toxicities. Given that predators should avoid uncertainty when managing their toxin intake, we tested whether European starlings ( Sturnus vulgaris ) preferred to eat fixed-defence prey (where all prey contained a 2% quinine solution) to mixed-defence prey (where half the prey contained a 4% quinine solution and the other half contained only water). Our results support the idea that predators should be more ‘risk-averse’ when foraging on variably defended prey and suggest that variation in toxicity levels could be a form of defence.


2013 ◽  
Vol 100 (6) ◽  
pp. 507-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parth K. Rajyaguru ◽  
Kimberly V. Pegram ◽  
Alexandra C. N. Kingston ◽  
Ronald L. Rutowski

2017 ◽  
Vol 284 (1861) ◽  
pp. 20170926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne E. Winters ◽  
Naomi F. Green ◽  
Nerida G. Wilson ◽  
Martin J. How ◽  
Mary J. Garson ◽  
...  

Warning signal variation is ubiquitous but paradoxical: low variability should aid recognition and learning by predators. However, spatial variability in the direction and strength of selection for individual elements of the warning signal may allow phenotypic variation for some components, but not others. Variation in selection may occur if predators only learn particular colour pattern components rather than the entire signal. Here, we used a nudibranch mollusc, Goniobranchus splendidus , which exhibits a conspicuous red spot/white body/yellow rim colour pattern, to test this hypothesis. We first demonstrated that secondary metabolites stored within the nudibranch were unpalatable to a marine organism. Using pattern analysis, we demonstrated that the yellow rim remained invariable within and between populations; however, red spots varied significantly in both colour and pattern. In behavioural experiments, a potential fish predator, Rhinecanthus aculeatus , used the presence of the yellow rims to recognize and avoid warning signals. Yellow rims remained stable in the presence of high genetic divergence among populations. We therefore suggest that how predators learn warning signals may cause stabilizing selection on individual colour pattern elements, and will thus have important implications on the evolution of warning signals.


2006 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 685-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.W. Otis ◽  
B. Locke ◽  
N.G. McKenzie ◽  
D. Cheung ◽  
E. MacLeod ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 279 (1728) ◽  
pp. 417-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Stevens ◽  
Graeme D. Ruxton

Many animals are toxic or unpalatable and signal this to predators with warning signals (aposematism). Aposematic appearance has long been a classical system to study predator–prey interactions, communication and signalling, and animal behaviour and learning. The area has received considerable empirical and theoretical investigation. However, most research has centred on understanding the initial evolution of aposematism, despite the fact that these studies often tell us little about the form and diversity of real warning signals in nature. In contrast, less attention has been given to the mechanistic basis of aposematic markings; that is, ‘what makes an effective warning signal?’, and the efficacy of warning signals has been neglected. Furthermore, unlike other areas of adaptive coloration research (such as camouflage and mate choice), studies of warning coloration have often been slow to address predator vision and psychology. Here, we review the current understanding of warning signal form, with an aim to comprehend the diversity of warning signals in nature. We present hypotheses and suggestions for future work regarding our current understanding of several inter-related questions covering the form of warning signals and their relationship with predator vision, learning, and links to broader issues in evolutionary ecology such as mate choice and speciation.


2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 732-735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah M. Rowland ◽  
Elizabeth Wiley ◽  
Graeme D. Ruxton ◽  
Johanna Mappes ◽  
Michael P. Speed

In 1879, Fritz Müller hypothesized that mimetic resemblance in which defended prey display the same warning signal would share the costs of predator education. Although Müller argued that predators would need to ingest a fixed number of prey with a given visual signal when learning to avoid unpalatable prey, this assumption lacks empirical support. We report an experiment which shows that, as the number of unpalatable prey presented to them increased, avian predators attacked higher numbers of those prey. We calculated that, when predators increase attacks, the fitness costs incurred by unpalatable prey can be substantial. This suggests that the survival benefits of mimicry could be lower than Müller proposed. An important finding is, however, that these costs decline in importance as the total number of available prey increases.


2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (51) ◽  
pp. 14560-14567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris T. Bauch ◽  
Ram Sigdel ◽  
Joe Pharaon ◽  
Madhur Anand

In complex systems, a critical transition is a shift in a system’s dynamical regime from its current state to a strongly contrasting state as external conditions move beyond a tipping point. These transitions are often preceded by characteristic early warning signals such as increased system variability. However, early warning signals in complex, coupled human–environment systems (HESs) remain little studied. Here, we compare critical transitions and their early warning signals in a coupled HES model to an equivalent environment model uncoupled from the human system. We parameterize the HES model, using social and ecological data from old-growth forests in Oregon. We find that the coupled HES exhibits a richer variety of dynamics and regime shifts than the uncoupled environment system. Moreover, the early warning signals in the coupled HES can be ambiguous, heralding either an era of ecosystem conservationism or collapse of both forest ecosystems and conservationism. The presence of human feedback in the coupled HES can also mitigate the early warning signal, making it more difficult to detect the oncoming regime shift. We furthermore show how the coupled HES can be “doomed to criticality”: Strategic human interactions cause the system to remain perpetually in the vicinity of a collapse threshold, as humans become complacent when the resource seems protected but respond rapidly when it is under immediate threat. We conclude that the opportunities, benefits, and challenges of modeling regime shifts and early warning signals in coupled HESs merit further research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document