The Holy Defense Museum in Tehran, or How to Aestheticize War

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-77
Author(s):  
Anna Vanzan

Abstract In September 2013 the Iranian authorities inaugurated the Holy Defense Museum (Muzeh-i Dafa’-i Moqaddas) in the capital Tehran that also hosts a Martyrs’ Museum (Muzeh-i Shuhada) built in the early 1980s and later renovated. The new museum is part of a grandiose project to commemorate the sacrifice of Iranians during the war provoked by the Iraqi regime (1980–1988). The museum encompasses various aspects of the arts (visual, cinematic, photographic, literary, etc.) shaped to remember and celebrate the martyrs of that war. The 1979 Iranian Revolution and the following Iran-Iraq War produced an enormous amount of visual material; works produced during this crucial period that disrupted the balance of power, both regionally and internationally, constitute an important part of Iran’s recent history. Visual materials produced in that period not only constitute a collective graphic memory of those traumatic years, they also revolutionized Iranian aesthetics. The Islamic Republic of Iran (hereafter IRI) establishment has a long experience in molding contemporary art for political purposes and the Holy Defense Museum represents the zenith of this imposing project. In this paper, I present an analytic and descriptive reading of the museum in light of my direct experience visiting the museum, and I explore its role in maintaining the collective memory of the Iran-Iraq conflict, in celebrating the revolution and in aestheticizing war.

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 595-617
Author(s):  
Ronen A. Cohen ◽  
Eyal Lewin

This article examines the social components of national resilience as the source of the Islamic Republic of Iran’s ability to cope with possibly lethal blows and economic setbacks through four stages: (I) an account of the 1980–1988 Iran–Iraq War and the surprising outcome that left Iran undefeated, (II) a review of several theories that can aid us to analyze Iran’s national resilience ability, (III) an analysis of Iran’s wartime survival using the abovementioned theoretical infrastructure, (IV) a concise review of current issues in Iranian society which concludes with an evaluation of the state of Iran’s resilience regarding attacks on their nuclear program and its ramifications.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 148-162
Author(s):  
Sana Chavoshian

Casting the fallen soldiers of the Iran-Iraq War (1980–1988) as ‘martyrs’ plays a crucial role in the legitimation discourse of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The government has succeeded in integrating many ‘martyr families’ into a state-revering political cult. This ethnographic study draws on theories of affect and atmosphere to investigate how practices around saintly dreams and their materialization in photographs and gravestones of martyrs have challenged the state narratives and discourses. I approach the veneration of martyrs through both affective and narrative sources and explore gravestones as new saintly localities. These localities are spaces of divinely intermediation with intimate connection to the transcendental realm. The multifaceted atmosphere of these sites offers nonconformist and heterogeneous entanglements in which dream-images of martyrs allow for the momentary subversion of the state’s political cult.


Author(s):  
VAHAN BAYBURDYAN

After the 1979 Islamic revolution in Iran, the leaders of the Kurdish parties and organizations that had been in exile during the shah regime, returned to their motherland. One of the influential Kurdish parties, the Democratic Party of Iranian Kurdistan brought forth the following slogan: “Democracy to Iran, autonomy to Kurdistan”. But this demand for autonomy was rejected by the Islamic regime and its leader Imam Khomeini with the argumentation that the idea of autonomy for small nations paved the way for separatism and segregation of Iran. Thus, the government brought forward the principle of the administrative and cultural so-called self-management of the regions populated by small nations. This was rejected by the Kurds and other small nations living in Iran. The negotiations between the Islamic regime and different Kurdish political forces brought no result and the confrontation between the two parties sometimes turned into armed clashes. During the 1980-1988 Iran-Iraq war the Iranian government wanted peace in the Iranian Kurdistan as this would guarantee a stable and secure rear under conditions of war. The article shows that there is no unity between the leaders of Kurdish society, they have quite different views concerning the needs of the Kurdish people and as a rule they represent political positions and objectives contradicting each other. Presently the Iranian authorities have adopted a policy of avoiding apparent clashes with the Kurds. The government makes social and economic reforms in the regions populated by Kurds, they build roads, create jobs, etc. Hassan Rouhani, the president of the Islamic Republic of Iran tries to demonstrate a policy of some liberalization in the Kurdish regions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 976-981
Author(s):  
Elahe Tajeddin ◽  
Leila Ganji ◽  
Zahra Hasani ◽  
Fahimeh Sadat Ghoalm Mostafaei ◽  
Masoumeh Azimirad

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document