Intolerance and discrimination against Muslims (Islamophobia)

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 192-200
Author(s):  
Ömür Orhun

AbstractIn this article, after a brief introduction related to the present environment, Ambassador Orhun discusses human rights, mutual respect and dialogue, leading to an evaluation of intolerance and discrimination against Muslims. He finds that the environment in which Muslims live in Western countries has deteriorated considerably in the post September 11 period. He then provides an overview of his experience as OSCE's Personal Representative on Combating Intolerance and Discrimination against Muslims. After sharing his views on ways to promote tolerance and combat discrimination against Muslims, Ambassador Orhun concludes with his recommendations. He stresses the need to take account of the intellectual front in the fight against intolerance and discrimination and dwells especially on true integration to enable Muslim migrants to feel at home in a cohesive society. He says that the real threat to tolerance and to multi-cultural societies emanates from the extremes of host and migrant groups and cautions vigilance to achieve peaceful co-existence.

Author(s):  
Mahdiyeh Ezzatikarami ◽  
Firouzeh Ameri

Persepolis is one of the significant memoirs published by Iranian émigré women in the tumultuous post-September 11 era. In the Euro-American context, critics embrace Satrapi’s emphasis on universal human rights; however, they have neglected her Orientalist discourse which problematizes her representation of Iranian Muslim women. The present paper looks into Satrapi’s Orientalist discourse in Persepolis mainly drawing upon Lacan’s theory of the object’s gaze. It concludes that Satrapi’s Orientalist discourse has been disguised through her emphasis on the intercultural momentum toward human rights, which makes her role as a ‘comprador intellectual’ much more destructive than that of her counterparts. Her peculiar style and wise choice of narration have unquestionably rendered the book to a wide-ranging audience, as a result of which, Persepolis has played a critical role representing Iranian Muslim woman in the post-September 11 era.


Author(s):  
Kate O’Regan

This edited conversation between Professor Kate O’Regan of the Bonavero Institute of Human Rights and Lord Neuberger and Lord Dyson reflects on their Lordships’ time as judges and Masters of the Rolls managing the civil justice system in England & Wales. Subjects include: the value of the overriding objective; whether procedural rules should be prescriptive or allow for judicial discretion; the costs and funding crisis facing the justice system, especially for those of limited means, including how legal disputes should be funded and who should be funding them; and how to balance the right to a fair trial with national security interests in a post-September 11 world.


2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Moh. Zeinudin

Post September 11 2011 tragedy, being a Muslim in Western countries is a challenge. Tariq Ramadan with his books stands appearing as one of press secretaries trying to break down the negative stereotype of Islam in Western Countries. Ramadan shows the empirical data of Muslims plurality and progressivity whether it relates to quantity or quality manner that colorizes its civilization. Tariq Ramadan states that such progressivity illustrated clearly the fact that the center of Islam is not only in Middle East Countries but also is potential in Western Countries.


2020 ◽  
pp. 89-97
Author(s):  
Oliver Nikolić

In this paper, the author presents the Declaration on Human Rights in Islam, one of the most important legal acts on human rights adopted by the Organization of Islamic Cooperation in Cairo in 1990. Although this Declaration pretends to improve the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, it must be stated that it is acceptable only in countries with a population of Islamic faiths. What most threatens the universality of its application is its deep-rootedness and literal dependence on Sharia law. The article briefly describes all the rights and freedoms mentioned in the Cairo Declaration. At first glance, this Declaration provides protection and guarantees many human rights, even more than the Universal Declaration, but all these rights must be in accordance with Sharia law. This mandatory compliance with Sharia law often makes senseless and restrains the real protection of guaranteed rights. Both positive and negative thoughts and views on the Cairo Declaration are presented, depending on whether theorists of Islamic religions or Western countries have written about it. No matter how you look at it, this Declaration will make sense and will be valid only in Muslim countries, without any possibilities to apply it in some other countries.


2000 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 20-26
Author(s):  
Michael Daxner

These days, the old Europe is moving towards its final curtain call. The war in the Balkans is a spectre which repeats and concludes all that happened in the last century; and a ghostly farce unrolls before us. Concepts like war and peace, the rights of nations, humanity and human rights are the conceptual covers of a happening now ripening into fateful maturity. Its primary causes were a tactical holding back, a lack of knowledge of the real circumstances, secret and openly expressed prejudices, and a shabby mentality of 'not getting involved'. As a result of this, all structures are being destroyed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document