The Modality Of Interaction Between Jewish And Christian Thought In The Middle Ages: The Problem Of Free Will And Divine Wisdom In Dante Alighieri And Menahem Recanati As A Case Study

Scrinium ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-74
Author(s):  
Basil Lourié

Summary Maximus’ idea of appropriation of the divine will by deified humans, in any consistent interpretation, would mean their deprivation of their own freedom – exactly in the same manner as it could be in the case of servitude to sin. Maximus’ own logic, however, was paraconsistent when applied to the case of deification (whereas not to the opposite case of the servitude to sin). A recourse to a paraconsistent deontic logic was not a uniquely Maximian tool even in the Middle Ages and could serve as an inspiring example for logicians today.


Vivarium ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 51 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 485-510
Author(s):  
Sara L. Uckelman

Abstract Temporal logic as a modern discipline is separate from classical logic; it is seen as an addition or expansion of the more basic propositional and predicate logics. This approach is in contrast with logic in the Middle Ages, which was primarily intended as a tool for the analysis of natural language. Because all natural language sentences have tensed verbs, medieval logic is inherently a temporal logic. This fact is most clearly exemplified in medieval theories of supposition. As a case study, we look at the supposition theory of Lambert of Lagny (Auxerre), extracting from it a temporal logic and providing a formalization of that logic.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document