Examples Of Asset Forfeiture Sharing Agreements And List Of Countries With Which United States Has Similar Agreements

2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-64
Author(s):  
Shaun L. Gabbidon ◽  
George E. Higgins ◽  
Favian Martin ◽  
Matthew Nelson ◽  
Jimmy Brown

2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jefferson E. Holcomb ◽  
Tomislav V. Kovandzic ◽  
Marian R. Williams

boundary 2 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-198
Author(s):  
Colin Dayan

What kind of legal history might account for the unique and continued practice of forfeiture in the United States? Law enforcement, as many recent writers have argued, has grown increasingly dependent on this fail-safe way to gain revenue, since civil asset forfeiture has few procedural safeguards. Unlike criminal forfeiture (in personam), civil forfeiture generally proceeds against the offending property (in rem), not against the person. A piece of property does not have the rights of a person; so, instead of proving crime beyond “a reasonable doubt,” suspicion equal to “probable cause” is enough. Your property is guilty until you prove it innocent. With civil forfeiture, owners do not have to be charged with a crime, let alone be convicted, to lose homes, cars, cash—or dogs. This effort to sharpen our understanding of dispossession is preeminently a legal project. It takes its meaning and garners its effects from the division between value and disregard, things and persons, human and nonhuman. In analyzing how legal reasoning has historically contributed to literal expropriation, I examine the generally invisible nexus of animality, human marginalization, and juridical authority.


Author(s):  
Stefan D. Cassella

This report discusses the goals that asset forfeiture is intended to serve in the federal criminal justice system, the types of property that are subject to forfeiture, and the procedures that are used to initiate, litigate, and conclude asset forfeiture cases.  With respect to procedure, its focus is on non-conviction-based (NCB) forfeiture, and especially on the safeguards that protect the property interests and due process rights of property owners.


Author(s):  
John M. Wehrung ◽  
Richard J. Harniman

Water tables in aquifer regions of the southwest United States are dropping off at a rate which is greater than can be replaced by natural means. It is estimated that by 1985 wells will run dry in this region unless adequate artificial recharging can be accomplished. Recharging with surface water is limited by the plugging of permeable rock formations underground by clay particles and organic debris.A controlled study was initiated in which sand grains were used as the rock formation and water with known clay concentrations as the recharge media. The plugging mechanism was investigated by direct observation in the SEM of frozen hydrated sand samples from selected depths.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document