Theory And Practice Of The Application Of International Law In Japan

2010 ◽  
pp. 75-94
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Theory And Practice

Philosophical and scientific foundations of a realistic approach to understanding and cognition of truth in various fields of cognitive activity, including in criminal proceedings

2021 ◽  
pp. 97
Author(s):  
Valerii V. Melnik
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
System Analysis ◽  
Preliminary Investigation ◽  
Cognitive Activity ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Realistic Approach ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Democratic Rule ◽  
Epistemological Basis

Continuing to explore the philosophical, moral-psychological, socio-psychological, legal-psychological and rhetorical problems of criminal proceedings, the author, using the methodology of system analysis in order to formulate and substantiate the problem within the framework of this article, identifies the main directions of the philosophical and scientific foundations of a realistic approach to understanding and cognition of the truth, including in criminal proceedings. The article analyzes the significance of the classical (correspondent) theory of truth as the initial epistemological basis of a realistic approach to understanding and cognition of truth in any sphere of cognitive activity, including in realistic epistemology, lawmaking, theory and practice of criminal proceedings. The author notes that the idea of truth as an integral part of the worldview of legislators, scientists and practicing lawyers is constructively used in the construction of a legally correct and fair preliminary investigation and trial in the Russian Federation, corresponding to the ideals of a democratic rule of law and standards of modern International Law, only when the court and participants in criminal proceedings on the part of the prosecution profess a non-relativistic, and a realistic approach to understanding and cognition of truth in the spirit of the correspondent (classical) theory of truth, the provisions of which in a dialectically “removed”, developed form are an integral part of realistic epistemology, including the dialectical-materialistic concept of cognition.

Perfect War: Alberico Gentili on the Use of Force and the Early Modern Law of Nations

Grotiana ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 263-281
Author(s):  
Valentina Vadi
Keyword(s):  
Early Modern ◽  
International Law ◽  
Civil Wars ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Dark Side ◽  
Dispute Settlement Mechanism ◽  
Law Of Nations ◽  
Imperial Expansion ◽  
Settlement Mechanism

Abstract Gentili’s conceptualization of war as a conflict between states attempted to limit the legitimacy of war to external wars only, thus precluding the legitimacy of civil wars. It reflected both the emergence of sovereign states and the vision of international law as a law among polities rather than individuals. The conceptualization of war as a dispute settlement mechanism among polities rather than a punishment for breach of the law of nations and the idea of the bilateral justice of war humanized the conduct of warfare and the content of peace treaties. The idea of perfect war excluded brigandage, piracy, and civil wars from its purview. Some scholars have suggested that perfect war had a dark side, legitimizing imperial expansion. Others have cautioned that Gentili explicitly opposed imperial expansion rather adopting anti-imperialist stances. This article suggests that these ambivalent readings of the Gentilian oeuvre reflect the ambivalence of the early modern law of nations. Under the early modern law of nations, aggression for the sake of empire was clearly unjust; nonetheless, imperial expansion took place. Whereas ‘a law which many transgress[ed] [wa]s nonetheless a law’, there was a wide divide between theory and practice.1

The Cross-Border Protection of Adults

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Frimston
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Roman Law ◽  
Private International Law ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
The Cross ◽  
Adult Protection

The cross-border protection of adults is an area of Private International Law, in which theory and practice may very often be in rather different places. In Chapters 2 has set out the broad Private International Law concepts likely to be encountered in adult protection. Chapters 3 describes the history and development from Roman law of internal law relating to the protective regimes that have existed and evolved for adults with an impairment and makes some comparisons.

At the Crossroads: Justus Lipsius and the Early Modern Development of International Law

2007 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
HALVARD LEIRA
Keyword(s):  
Early Modern ◽  
International Law ◽  
Natural Law ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
The Enlightenment ◽  
Modern Age ◽  
Modern Development ◽  
The Many ◽  
Late Renaissance ◽  
The Way

Justus Lipsius (1547–1606) was among the most famed intellectuals in his time, but was largely forgotten during the Enlightenment. Intellectually, he stood at an important crossroads, his thought incorporating both late Renaissance traits and precursors of the early modern age. In this article I give a brief intellectual background to Lipsius's thought before concentrating on his thought regarding the lawful interaction between polities, with a focus on lawful government, dissimulation, war, and empire. I then detail the way in which Lipsian thought critically informed later theory and practice. It contained an eclectic mix of divine law, natural law, and positive human law, with some elements borrowed and popularized from earlier writers and others being more original. In the end, his work stands out both as an important inspiration for later theorists and practitioners, and as an example of the many idiosyncrasies and possible trajectories that early international law could have adopted.

JUST WAR IN THEORY AND PRACTICE: THE LEGITIMATION OF SWEDISH INTERVENTION IN THE THIRTY YEARS WAR

2002 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 499-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
PÄRTEL PIIRIMÄE
Keyword(s):  
Seventeenth Century ◽  
International Law ◽  
Just War ◽  
Humanitarian Intervention ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Normative Language ◽  
Argumentative Strategy ◽  
Police Action

This article attempts to establish a connection between the practical legitimation of war and the theories of international law, examining Sweden's efforts to justify her intervention in the Thirty Years War in 1630. Swedish argumentative strategy is analysed in the light of two major traditions of thinking about war: theological and humanist ‘just war’ traditions. The article argues that Swedish leaders did not appeal to the more belligerent humanist arguments which would have enabled them to describe their campaign as a just war either on the grounds of pre-emptive defence or humanitarian intervention. Instead, they tried to interpret it as being within the limits set by the more restrictive theological tradition. This strategy eventually forced them to relinquish attempts to present their intervention as a genuine war and to develop an argument of ‘police-action’, even though it resulted in a loss of credibility. The case study suggests that in the early seventeenth century the prevailing normative language of just war was that of the theologians.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document