Philosophical and scientific foundations of a realistic approach to understanding and cognition of truth in various fields of cognitive activity, including in criminal proceedings

2021 ◽  
pp. 97
Author(s):  
Valerii V. Melnik
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
System Analysis ◽  
Preliminary Investigation ◽  
Cognitive Activity ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Realistic Approach ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Democratic Rule ◽  
Epistemological Basis

Continuing to explore the philosophical, moral-psychological, socio-psychological, legal-psychological and rhetorical problems of criminal proceedings, the author, using the methodology of system analysis in order to formulate and substantiate the problem within the framework of this article, identifies the main directions of the philosophical and scientific foundations of a realistic approach to understanding and cognition of the truth, including in criminal proceedings. The article analyzes the significance of the classical (correspondent) theory of truth as the initial epistemological basis of a realistic approach to understanding and cognition of truth in any sphere of cognitive activity, including in realistic epistemology, lawmaking, theory and practice of criminal proceedings. The author notes that the idea of truth as an integral part of the worldview of legislators, scientists and practicing lawyers is constructively used in the construction of a legally correct and fair preliminary investigation and trial in the Russian Federation, corresponding to the ideals of a democratic rule of law and standards of modern International Law, only when the court and participants in criminal proceedings on the part of the prosecution profess a non-relativistic, and a realistic approach to understanding and cognition of truth in the spirit of the correspondent (classical) theory of truth, the provisions of which in a dialectically “removed”, developed form are an integral part of realistic epistemology, including the dialectical-materialistic concept of cognition.

scholarly journals Investigative Knowledge as Object of Interdisciplinary Research

Lex Russica ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 92-106
Author(s):  
V. D. Korma ◽  
V. A. Obraztsov
Keyword(s):  
Interdisciplinary Research ◽  
Preliminary Investigation ◽  
Cognitive Activity ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Professional Activity ◽  
Mental Images ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Material Environment ◽  
The Subject

The paper is devoted to the current problems of theory and practice of cognitive activity of an investigating officer in the field of pre-trial criminal proceedings. The ideas expressed by the authors, the developed provisions and recommendations, characteristics and classifications concerning the subject, methods, means and technologies of the investigator’s cognitive mission are based on empirically established regularities of two groups (categories). The first is the regularities of criminal and related types of legally significant behavior (activity), as well as the process of its reflection in the material environment. The second group is the laws underlying the organization and implementation of anti-criminal investigative activities in the stages of initiation of criminal proceedings and preliminary investigation. Attention is given to the issues concerning the relation of investigative knowledge and recognition, essence and mechanisms of these forms (directions) of professional activity of the investigating officer, as well as the problem of formation, interaction and recognition of mental images of the acts containing indicia of crimes. Along with this, the paper reflects the concept definitions of investigative cognition and investigative recognition formulated by the authors.

scholarly journals Procedural Discretion of the Court when Refusing to Initiate Criminal Proceedings

Legal Concept ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 144-150
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Azarova
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
System Analysis ◽  
Preliminary Investigation ◽  
Federal Court ◽  
Judicial Discretion ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
The Russian Federation

Introduction: if we consider the content of procedural discretion of the court when refusing to initiate criminal cases, refusing petitions at the stage of preliminary investigation, these refusals are known to be able to be appealed in the district (federal) court (Part 5 of Article 144, Article 122, 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation). In these cases, the judicial review raises a question not only for the defense, but also for the court itself, which is what the actions and decisions of the preliminary investigation bodies in such refusals are and whether there are signs of tort in their actions when making such decisions. The author of this paper sets the goal of research, which is to consider the content of procedural discretion of the court in case of refusal to initiate criminal proceedings. Methods: the methodological framework for the research is the dialectical-materialistic method of cognition, which includes the elements of system analysis, and specific scientific methods, such as the logical and legal ones. Results: based on the legal analysis, the content of judicial discretion in case of refusal to initiate criminal proceedings is revealed. The paper raises a question related to the consideration of judicial discretion as a guarantee of the court’s activity at the pre-trial stages of the criminal process. Conclusions: it is revealed that the scheme of judicial discretion in the event of a complaint about the refusal to initiate criminal proceedings should be based on the criteria of judicial discretion at the stage of trial.

Organization of pre-trial proceedings in criminal cases in Russia and abroad as a factor in ensuring access to justice

2020 ◽  
pp. 167-179
Author(s):  
T. Yu. Vilkova
Keyword(s):  
Preliminary Investigation ◽  
Cognitive Activity ◽  
Government Agencies ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Online Service ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Moment ◽  
The Right

The article shows the main models of building pre-trial proceedings in the Russian Federation and foreign countries, analyzes the provision of access to justice in each of the models. A number of measures have been proposed to build pre-trial proceedings in criminal cases that effectively ensure access to justice, including abandoning the stage of initiating a criminal case and keeping a countdown of the preliminary investigation from the moment of registration of a crime report, conducting pre-trial cognitive activity (investigation) under the guidance of a prosecutor, and bringing charges by the prosecutor.based on the results of the investigation, granting participants who are not vested with authority the right to apply to the court to deposit evidence and to assist the court in protecting their interests in connection with the refusal of the preliminary investigation body to satisfy motions related to the process of proving, the introduction of effective simplified and accelerated procedures in pre-trial proceedings, the establishment of digital interaction between government agencies and the population through a single secure digital online platform; creation of a mechanism for filing reports of crime through a special online service integrated into the specified digital platform.

scholarly journals THE OBSTRUCTION OF THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE AND PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION: PROBLEMS OF THE OBJECT AND THE OBJECTIVE SIDE

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-105
Author(s):  
Alexandra Vladimirovna Boyarskaya
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Complex Analysis ◽  
Preliminary Investigation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Body ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
The Russian Federation

The subject. The article is devoted to the investigation of the main direct object and the circle of victims are subjected of harm by criminal acts stipulated by pts. 1, 2 of art. 294 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.The purpose of the paper is to identify does the art. 294 of Criminal Code of the Russian Federation meets the other provisions of criminal procedure legislation.The methodology of research includes methods of complex analysis, synthesis, as well as formal-logical, comparative legal and formal-legal methods.Results and scope of application. The content of art. 294 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation does not comply with the provisions of the criminal procedure law. The discrep-ancy lies in terms of the range of participants in criminal proceedings and the functions performed by them, as well as the actual content and correlation of such stages of criminal proceedings as the initiation of criminal proceedings and preliminary investigation. In addi-tion, the current state of art. 294 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation does not take into account the ever-widening differentiation of criminal proceedings.The circle of victims listed in pt. 2 of art. 294 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation should be supplemented by such participants in the criminal process as a criminal investi-gator, the head of the investigative body, the head of the inquiry department, the head of the body of inquiry. At the same time, the author supports the position that the criminal-legal protection of the said persons should cover not only their activities at the stage of preliminary investigation, but also of the entire pre-trial proceedings as a whole.The circle of criminal acts provided for in art. 294 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Fed-eration, should also be specified with an indication of encroachment in the form of kidnapping, destruction or damage to such a crime as materials of criminal, civil and other cases, as well as material evidence.Conclusions. The content of art. 294 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation does not comply with the provisions of the criminal procedure law. The author formulates the conclusion that the circle of victims listed in pt. 2 of art. 294 of the Criminal Code should be broadened and joins the position that the criminal-legal protection of these persons should cover not only their activities at the stage of preliminary investigation, but also of the entire pre-trial proceedings as a whole.

scholarly journals ON SOME COMMENTS ON THE NORMATIVE FORMULATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1(63)) ◽  
pp. 127-133
Author(s):  
Виктор Николаевич ГРИГОРЬЕВ
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Preliminary Investigation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Legal Situation ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

The purpose of Russian criminal proceedings, which is very important among the modern social and legal institutions, is nevertheless deficient in its legal and regulatory form. It is noted that in the modern situation, some formulations of the purpose of criminal proceedings have come into conflict with the real social and legal reality. Purpose: to resolve contradictions between the formulations of the purpose of criminal proceedings and the actual social and legal reality. Methods: the author uses the methods of dialectical and formal logic, comparison, description, observation, interviewing, experiment, analysis, interpretation. Results: a theoretical basis has been developed for the choice, in the event of a conflict between the formulations of the purpose of criminal proceedings and the actual social and legal situation, of whether to change the normative formulation of the purpose of criminal proceedings or whether to change the procedure itself. In choosing the subject of reform, preference is given to traditional Russian values. Modern trends in Russian criminal proceedings do not fully reflect the needs of civil society in the Russian Federation. It is more accurate to assume that this is the result of a system of departmental and bureaucratic measures to distribute influence and burden. From a humanitarian standpoint, it would be more correct to return the criminal justice system to a state where it will again reflect the lost purpose, in particular, protecting individuals from unlawful accusations. The first step should be to remove from law enforcement officials the obligation to be unilateral in the examination of evidence and to represent only one party – the accusation (Chapter 6 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation), as well as to remove the normative prohibition for the preliminary investigation and inquiry bodies to gather evidence defending the accused (Part 2 article 15 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation).

scholarly journals Is Formal Legal and Objective (Material) Truth Reconcilable in the CCP RF?

2019 ◽  
pp. 61-66
Author(s):  
Gennady Pechnikov ◽  
Vladimir Shinkaruk ◽  
Natalia Solovyova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Cognitive Activity ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Type Model ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Philosophical Approach ◽  
Criminal Process ◽  
Objective Truth ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
History Of Culture

The article critically evaluates the point of view on the coexistence of formally legal truth and objective (material) truth in today's Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, it also criticizes the position that there are no criteria that clearly distinguishing these truths and that the philosophical approach should not be disseminated on the criminal process, which should be taken autonomously from philosophy. The article defends the point of view that in the present Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation competition is selfsufficient and excludes objective truth. Adversarial criminal process is characterized by formal legal truth, and objective truth requires a fundamentally different type (model) of criminal proceedings - an objectively true criminal process. The authors consider this model of criminal proceedings to be a higher, more perfect and fair type of criminal proceedings, in contrast to the adversarial (winning-losing) type of criminal process, in which the "right and fairness of the strong" prevails.The authors of the article firmly stand on the philosophy of the materialist dialectic; they believe that a philosophical approach is also necessary in the criminal process. In this regard, there are dialectical and non-dialectical (not taking into account the objective laws and rules of dialectics) criminal processes. Relativism of the adversary criminal process, its susceptibility to sophistry are obvious. Therefore, in a competitive duel of the parties, it is important to be more convincing in your arguments than your procedural opponent. We see an objectively-true model of the criminal process as a higher, more perfect and more equitable type of criminal proceedings. The intention of truth and the belief in the ability to prove it give a moral meaning to cognitive activity, whereas indifference to it was perceived throughout the history of culture as a threat to the moral existence of society.

scholarly journals The role of international bodies and organizations in the development of legal framework for application of video conferencing in criminal proceedings of the Russian Federation

2021 ◽  
pp. 31-41
Author(s):  
Mariia Aleksandrovna Iurkevich
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Video Conferencing ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
International Agreements ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Short Period ◽  
The Russian Federation

Legal regulation of the use of video technologies in the Russian criminal procedure is conducted on the international and domestic levels. However, based on the primacy of international law recognized by the Russian Federation, the marker is the position of international community that is reflected in the normative legal acts of its special bodies, as well as on the doctrinal level. This article carries out the chronological analysis of the acts issued by international bodies and organizations pertaining to the use video conferencing in criminal proceedings. The subject of this research is the acts of international bodies and organizations that underlie the development of the national legal framework for the use of video conferencing in the Russian Federation. The analysis of normative acts that regulate the use of video conferencing in the Russian criminal procedure demonstrate that for the most part this question is being addressed in the international agreements ratified by the Russian Federation, rather than in the national legislation (considering the provisions of the Part 3 of the Article 1 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation). Leaning on the acquired results, the author concludes that such tendency can be explained by a number of circumstances, namely lag in the rates of digitalization compared to the leading European practices, insignificant period of approbation of the results of using video technologies, as well as relatively short period of intensive implementation of such technologies due to the amendments in criminal procedure policy of the country, which now requires exhaustive normative regulation. The author believes that it is more appropriate to begin the analysis of normative acts that determine the legal framework for application of video conferencing in criminal proceedings of the Russian Federation with the general principles and norms of international law and international agreements, since their role in intensification of the process of digital transformation of criminal procedure in Russia cannot be overestimated.

scholarly journals Concept of Digital Evidence, Current Status and Its Role in the Evidentiary Process

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 55-60
Author(s):  
A. Yu. Cherdantsev
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Preliminary Investigation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Digital Evidence ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Significant Information ◽  
Current State ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article analyzes the international current state of the concept of digital evidence, its meaning, types and role in the process of proving in criminal cases in the practical activities of the preliminary investigation bodies of the Russian Federation, considers some problems arising in law enforcement practice, suggests the author's classification of modern digital traces, studies and compares international practice governing the practical application of digital evidence, their concept and content. The problem of gaps in the legal regulation of digital evidence is considered, as well as the possibility of introducing amendments to the current legislation concerning the legal recognition of digital evidence along with traditional types of evidence, as well as the regulation of the use of digital evidence in criminal proceedings, and a proposal is made to introduce a number of amendments to the current legislation of the Russian Federation, where it is necessary to secure definitions of digital evidence, thus legalizing it, stating in the following re At the same time, it is noted that there is no need to introduce a separate article to regulate digital (electronic) evidences, because it is rather difficult to determine the volume of digital (electronic) evidences (digital criminally significant information), at least because there is no unanimity in this respect and there was no unanimity, besides, due to the dynamic development of electronics, including personal ones, this norm quickly lost its relevance and required amendments, creating a certain gap in legal regulation, which is more complicated.

scholarly journals Alteration of court charges: ways of legislative solution of the problem

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 04007
Author(s):  
Boris Yakovlevich Gavrilov ◽  
Sergey Viktorovich Burmagin ◽  
Pavel Kelseevich Barabanov ◽  
Irina Pavlovna Popova ◽  
Aleksey Aleksandrovich Ilyukhov
Keyword(s):  
Preliminary Investigation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Socialist Republic ◽  
Dialectical Approach ◽  
Systemic Analysis ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
A Charge ◽  
Legal Mechanism

The article deals with the issues relevant for the criminal proceedings of Russia, connected with the practical need of legislative consolidation of procedural rules fixed in the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation (CCP RF) that provide a possibility for the court to alter charges brought by preliminary investigation bodies. The current procedural rules, to change accusation for a graver verdict, establish the procedure enshrined in Article 237 of the CCP RF, according to which the court must return a criminal case to the prosecutor, while the latter has to return the same to the investigator (interrogating officer). This practice in fact returns the law enforcer to the provisions of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic Code of Criminal Procedure that maintained the existence of the institute of supplementary investigation; the court annually returned from 40 to 55 thousand cases to investigators within the framework of this institute. Having set the goal to explore the problematic issues of amending a faulty accusation in court and finding an optimal legal mechanism for the court’s amending a charge towards its stiffening, the authors, using the methods of scientific knowledge – dialectical approach, comparative legal method, statistical and systemic analysis – analysed the scholarly views on the said problem and the practice of enforcing Article 237 of the CCP RF by Russian courts; made a comparative research of foreign laws governing the issues of alteration of court charges. The authors, on the basis of the research results, made a conclusion on the need to develop an efficient legislative procedure in terms of altering indictment towards a more serious verdict by the prosecution – directly at the court session, under supervision of the court and without returning a case for supplementary investigation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document