The Effect Of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy On Tumor Size And Local Control Of Early Stage NSCLC

Author(s):  
Muath Bishawi ◽  
Michael Halbreiner ◽  
Bong Kim ◽  
Mathew Worth ◽  
Mumal Usman ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (26) ◽  
pp. 3071-3079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Luo ◽  
Yingying Cui ◽  
Hengli Song ◽  
Ronghu Mao ◽  
Qiang Gao ◽  
...  

Aim: Treatment schedules of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are varied. The aim of this study was to clarify the optimal biologically effective dose (BED) for the treatment of stage I NSCLC. Methods: Research findings published after 1990 detailing the effects of SBRT on early-stage NSCLC patients were compiled from the Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. For comparative analyses, two groups were divided into moderate BED (100–150 Gy) and high BED (BED ≥150 Gy). Results: Two moderate BED studies and four high BED studies were selected for analysis. The results from the analysis of four moderate and high groups suggest that the 2-year local control rate was significantly lower in moderate BED group than that of high BED group (p = 0.04). Subgroup analysis by tumor size was also conducted. For patients with Stage IA disease, no difference in overall survival (OS) was found. No statistically significant difference was achieved in the instance of Stage IB tumor; however, the 2-year OS showed a trend in favor of high BED (p = 0.08). The remaining two studies, comparing 106 Gy (Stage IA) to 120-132 Gy (Stage IB) treatment, indicated a significantly higher 3-year OS in the 106 Gy group than that of 120–132 Gy group (p = 0.009). Conclusion: In patients with early-stage NSCLC treated with SBRT, our analyses suggested that a moderate BED, especially 106 Gy, is sufficient for the treatment of Stage IA tumor; although a high BED conferred no significant benefit to OS for the treatment of Stage IB tumor, a higher local control rate was achieved. Further detailed studies should be performed to explore the optimal BED for the treatment of Stage IB tumor.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Nicosia ◽  
Chiara Reverberi ◽  
Linda Agolli ◽  
Luca Marinelli ◽  
Vitaliana De Sanctis ◽  
...  

Abstract Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a standard treatment for inoperable early-stage NSCLC, with local control rates comparable to surgical series. Promising results have been achieved utilizing a high single-dose schedule. The aim of our study was to evaluate long-term local control and toxicity in a series of patients treated with SBRT delivered in a single dose of 30 Gy. 44 patients affected by early stage NSCLC were treated with SBRT delivered in a single dose of 30 Gy. Survival and prognostic factors were retrospectively evaluated. Median follow-up was 34 months (range 3–81). Three- and 5-year local progression-free survival (LPFS) were 87.8% and 87.8% respectively (median 30 months; range 6–81 months), 3- and 5-year OS and CSS were 64.9% and 36.9%, 80.9% and 65.5%, respectively. Two (4.6%) cases of grade 3 pneumonitis occurred. At the univariate analysis lesion diameter ≤ 25 mm was predictive of better 5-year LPFS (95.8% versus 56.3%; p = 0.003) and 5-year PFS (69.8% versus 27.8%; p = 0.002). The results of our study indicated a high local control, survival and tolerability after a long-term follow-up with the use of SBRT 30 Gy single dose. Further prospective studies could better define the role of this regimen.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 176
Author(s):  
Yuhei Miyasaka ◽  
Shuichiro Komatsu ◽  
Takanori Abe ◽  
Nobuteru Kubo ◽  
Naoko Okano ◽  
...  

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Radiotherapy is an essential treatment modality for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is the standard treatment for early-stage NSCLC because of its favorable local control (LC) compared to conventional radiotherapy. Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is a kind of external beam radiotherapy characterized by a steeper dose distribution and higher biological effectiveness. Several prospective studies have shown favorable outcomes. However, there is no direct comparison study between CIRT and SBRT to determine their benefits in the management of early-stage NSCLC. Thus, we conducted a retrospective, single-institutional, and contemporaneous comparison study, including propensity score-adjusted analyses, to clarify the differences in oncologic outcomes. The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 80.1% in CIRT and 71.6% in SBRT (p = 0.0077). The 3-year LC was 87.7% in the CIRT group and 79.1% in the SBRT group (p = 0.037). Multivariable analyses showed favorable OS and LC in the CIRT group (hazard risk [HR] = 0.41, p = 0.047; HR = 0.30, p = 0.040, respectively). Log-rank tests after propensity score matching and Cox regression analyses using propensity score confirmed these results. These data provided a positive efficacy profile of CIRT for early-stage NSCLC.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy C. Moreno ◽  
Bryan Fellman ◽  
Brian P. Hobbs ◽  
Zhongxing Liao ◽  
Daniel R. Gomez ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 287-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Claude M. Rwigema ◽  
Allen M. Chen ◽  
Pin-Chieh Wang ◽  
Jay M. Lee ◽  
Edward Garon ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 115 ◽  
pp. S329
Author(s):  
S. Rehman ◽  
M. Roach ◽  
D. Mullen ◽  
T. DeWees ◽  
J. Bradley ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document