Seismic Fragility Analysis of Long-Span Cable-Stayed Bridges

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 160-164
Author(s):  
Chi-Yu Jiao ◽  
Jian-Zhong Li ◽  
Pei-Heng Long
2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 1797-1812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Zhong ◽  
Yutao Pang ◽  
Jong-Su Jeon ◽  
Reginald DesRoches ◽  
Wancheng Yuan

2019 ◽  
Vol 121 (1) ◽  
pp. 177-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Liang ◽  
Jialei Yana ◽  
Zhanqi Cheng ◽  
Huai Chen ◽  
Ruimin Mao

2011 ◽  
Vol 255-260 ◽  
pp. 2612-2617
Author(s):  
Gang Jin Li ◽  
Wen Hua Zhang

As important junction in lifeline transportation system, bridges are the most seismic vulnerable components. Based on the capacity/demand (C/D) analysis of bridge components, a practical method is established for seismic fragility assessment of long-span cable-stayed bridges. Depending on this approach, the seismic vulnerability assessment of the Wangdong Bridge, a cable-stayed bridge with a main span of 638m in Anhui Province, is conducted, and the feasibility of the approach is verified.


2020 ◽  
pp. 136943322097728
Author(s):  
Haoran Yu ◽  
Weibin Li

Reduced web section (RWS) connections and welded flange plate (WFP) connections can both effectively improve the seismic performance of a structure by moving plastic hinges to a predetermined location away from the column face. In this paper, two kinds of steel frames—with RWS connections and WFP connections—as well as different frames with welded unreinforced flange connections were studied through seismic fragility analysis. The numerical simulation was conducted by using multiscale FE modelling. Based on the incremental dynamic analysis and pushover analysis methods, probabilistic seismic demand analysis and seismic capability analysis were carried out, respectively. Finally, combined with the above analysis results, probabilistic seismic fragility analysis was conducted on the frame models. The results showed that the RWS connection and WFP connection (without double plates) have little influence on reducing the maximum inter-storey drift ratio under earthquake action. RWS connections slightly reduce the seismic capability in non-collapse stages and improve the seismic collapse resistance of a structure, which exhibits good structural ductility. WFP connections can comprehensively improve the seismic capability of a structure, but the seismic collapse resistance is worse than that of RWS connections when the structure has a large number of storeys. The frame with WFP connections has a lower failure probability at every seismic limit state, while the frame with RWS connections sacrifices some of its structural safety in non-collapse stages to reduce the collapse probability.


2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 3569-3579
Author(s):  
Shengjiang Sun ◽  
Kuihua Mei ◽  
Yiming Sun ◽  
Bo Li ◽  
Huanzi Huang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document