Clinical Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer Using Texture Analysis in Endoscopic Ultrasonography

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 1844-1848
Author(s):  
Jia Fan ◽  
Bo Min ◽  
Feng Xu ◽  
Peng Yang ◽  
Hongwei Ye ◽  
...  
Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 238
Author(s):  
Yasutaka Ishii ◽  
Masahiro Serikawa ◽  
Tomofumi Tsuboi ◽  
Ryota Kawamura ◽  
Ken Tsushima ◽  
...  

Pancreatic cancer has the poorest prognosis among all cancers, and early diagnosis is essential for improving the prognosis. Along with radiologic modalities, such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), endoscopic modalities play an important role in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. This review evaluates the roles of two of those modalities, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. EUS can detect pancreatic cancer with higher sensitivity and has excellent sensitivity for the diagnosis of small pancreatic cancer that cannot be detected by other imaging modalities. EUS may be useful for the surveillance of pancreatic cancer in high-risk individuals. Contrast-enhanced EUS and EUS elastography are also useful for differentiating solid pancreatic tumors. In addition, EUS-guided fine needle aspiration shows excellent sensitivity and specificity, even for small pancreatic cancer, and is an essential examination method for the definitive pathological diagnosis and treatment decision strategy. On the other hand, ERCP is invasive and performed less frequently for the purpose of diagnosing pancreatic cancer. However, ERCP is essential in cases that require evaluation of pancreatic duct stricture that may be early pancreatic cancer or those that require differentiation from focal autoimmune pancreatitis.


2004 ◽  
Vol 141 (10) ◽  
pp. 753 ◽  
Author(s):  
John DeWitt ◽  
Benedict Devereaux ◽  
Melissa Chriswell ◽  
Kathleen McGreevy ◽  
Thomas Howard ◽  
...  

Pancreatology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. S75
Author(s):  
Juri Ikemoto ◽  
Keiji Hanada ◽  
Tomoyuki Minami ◽  
Akihito Okazaki ◽  
Hironobu Amano ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S92-S96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Irisawa ◽  
Ai Sato ◽  
Masaki Sato ◽  
Tsunehiko Ikeda ◽  
Rei Suzuki ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 699-712 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenjiro Yasuda ◽  
Hidekazu Mukai ◽  
Masatsugu Nakajima

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasunobu Yamashita ◽  
Kensuke Tanioka ◽  
Yuki Kawaji ◽  
Takashi Tamura ◽  
Junya Nuta ◽  
...  

This study aimed to assess whether contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography (CH-EUS), compared to multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is useful for early diagnosis of small pancreatic cancer (PC). Between March 2010 and June 2018, all three imaging modalities and surgery were performed for patients with a pancreatic solid lesion measuring ≤20 mm; diagnostic ability was compared among modalities. Fifty-one of 60 patients were diagnosed with PC (PC size in 41 patients: 11–20 mm; 10 patients: ≤10 mm). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CH-EUS, MDCT, and MRI for PC (11–20 mm) detection were 95%/83%/94%, 78%/83%/79%, and 73%/33%/68%, respectively. The diagnostic ability of CH-EUS was significantly superior compared with MDCT and MRI (p = 0.002 and p = 0.007, respectively). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CH-EUS, MDCT, and MRI for PC (≤10 mm) detection were 70%/100%/77%, 20%/100%/38%, and 50%/100%/62%, respectively. The diagnostic ability of CH-EUS tended to be superior to that of MDCT (p = 0.025). The sensitivity of MDCT for PC (≤10 mm) detection was significantly lower than that for PC (11–20 mm) detection (20% vs. 78%; p = 0.001). CH-EUS, compared to MDCT and MRI, is useful for diagnosing small PCs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document