scholarly journals A Probabilistic Multimodel Ensemble Approach to Seasonal Prediction

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 812-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young-Mi Min ◽  
Vladimir N. Kryjov ◽  
Chung-Kyu Park
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Gaussian Approximation ◽  
Seasonal Prediction ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Ensemble Prediction ◽  
Prediction System ◽  
Sampling Errors ◽  
Seasonal Forecasts ◽  
Multimodel Ensemble ◽  
Ensemble Prediction System

Abstract A probabilistic multimodel ensemble prediction system (PMME) has been developed to provide operational seasonal forecasts at the Asia–Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Climate Center (APCC). This system is based on an uncalibrated multimodel ensemble, with model weights inversely proportional to the errors in forecast probability associated with the model sampling errors, and a parametric Gaussian fitting method for the estimate of tercile-based categorical probabilities. It is shown that the suggested method is the most appropriate for use in an operational global prediction system that combines a large number of models, with individual model ensembles essentially differing in size and model weights in the forecast and hindcast datasets being inconsistent. Justification for the use of a Gaussian approximation of the precipitation probability distribution function for global forecasts is also provided. PMME retrospective and real-time forecasts are assessed. For above normal and below normal categories, temperature forecasts outperform climatology for a large part of the globe. Precipitation forecasts are definitely more skillful than random guessing for the extratropics and climatological forecasts for the tropics. The skill of real-time forecasts lies within the range of the interannual variability of the historical forecasts.

scholarly journals Dynamical Seasonal Prediction of Tropical Cyclone Activity Using the FGOALS-f2 Ensemble Prediction System

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 1759-1778
Author(s):  
Jinxiao Li ◽  
Qing Bao ◽  
Yimin Liu ◽  
Guoxiong Wu ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tropical Cyclone ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Southern Oscillation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Seasonal Prediction ◽  
Prediction Skill ◽  
Ensemble Prediction ◽  
Prediction System ◽  
Ensemble Prediction System

AbstractThere is a distinct gap between tropical cyclone (TC) prediction skill and the societal demand for accurate predictions, especially in the western Pacific (WP) and North Atlantic (NA) basins, where densely populated areas are frequently affected by intense TC events. In this study, seasonal prediction skill for TC activity in the WP and NA of the fully coupled FGOALS-f2 V1.0 dynamical prediction system is evaluated. In total, 36 years of monthly hindcasts from 1981 to 2016 were completed with 24 ensemble members. The FGOALS-f2 V1.0 system has been used for real-time predictions since June 2017 with 35 ensemble members, and has been operationally used in the two operational prediction centers of China. Our evaluation indicates that FGOALS-f2 V1.0 can reasonably reproduce the density of TC genesis locations and tracks in the WP and NA. The model shows significant skill in terms of the TC number correlation in the WP (0.60) and the NA (0.61) from 1981 to 2015; however, the model underestimates accumulated cyclone energy. When the number of ensemble members was increased from 2 to 24, the correlation coefficients clearly increased (from 0.21 to 0.60 in the WP, and from 0.18 to 0.61 in the NA). FGOALS-f2 V1.0 also successfully reproduces the genesis potential index pattern and the relationship between El Niño–Southern Oscillation and TC activity, which is one of the dominant contributors to TC seasonal prediction skill. However, the biases in large-scale factors are barriers to the improvement of the seasonal prediction skill, e.g., larger wind shear, higher relative humidity, and weaker potential intensity of TCs. For real-time predictions in the WP, FGOALS-f2 V1.0 demonstrates a skillful prediction for track density in terms of landfalling TCs, and the model successfully forecasts the correct sign of seasonal anomalies of landfalling TCs for various regions in China.

scholarly journals Merits of a 108-Member Ensemble System in ENSO and IOD Predictions

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 957-972 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Doi ◽  
Swadhin K. Behera ◽  
Toshio Yamagata
Keyword(s):  
Seasonal Prediction ◽  
Ensemble Prediction ◽  
Economic Losses ◽  
Prediction System ◽  
Ensemble Size ◽  
Ensemble Prediction System ◽  
Skill Scores ◽  
Operational Systems ◽  
The Indian Ocean ◽  
Climate Events

This paper explores merits of 100-ensemble simulations from a single dynamical seasonal prediction system by evaluating differences in skill scores between ensembles predictions with few (~10) and many (~100) ensemble members. A 100-ensemble retrospective seasonal forecast experiment for 1983–2015 is beyond current operational capability. Prediction of extremely strong ENSO and the Indian Ocean dipole (IOD) events is significantly improved in the larger ensemble. It indicates that the ensemble size of 10 members, used in some operational systems, is not adequate for the occurrence of 15% tails of extreme climate events, because only about 1 or 2 members (approximately 15% of 12) will agree with the observations. We also showed an ensemble size of about 50 members may be adequate for the extreme El Niño and positive IOD predictions at least in the present prediction system. Even if running a large-ensemble prediction system is quite costly, improved prediction of disastrous extreme events is useful for minimizing risks of possible human and economic losses.

scholarly journals Dynamical downscaling of a multimodel ensemble prediction system: Application to tropical cyclones

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Manpreet Kaur ◽  
R. Phani Murali Krishna ◽  
Susmitha Joseph ◽  
Avijit Dey ◽  
Raju Mandal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tropical Cyclones ◽  
System Application ◽  
Dynamical Downscaling ◽  
Ensemble Prediction ◽  
Prediction System ◽  
Multimodel Ensemble ◽  
Ensemble Prediction System

scholarly journals Seasonal Ensemble Forecasts: Are Recalibrated Single Models Better than Multimodels?

2009 ◽  
Vol 137 (4) ◽  
pp. 1460-1479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas P. Weigel ◽  
Mark A. Liniger ◽  
Christof Appenzeller
Keyword(s):  
Ensemble Prediction ◽  
Model Errors ◽  
Seasonal Forecasts ◽  
Multimodel Ensemble ◽  
Ensemble Forecasts ◽  
Ensemble Prediction System ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Temperature And Precipitation ◽  
Probabilistic Forecasts ◽  
The Difference

Abstract Multimodel ensemble combination (MMEC) has become an accepted technique to improve probabilistic forecasts from short- to long-range time scales. MMEC techniques typically widen ensemble spread, thus improving the dispersion characteristics and the reliability of the forecasts. This raises the question as to whether the same effect could be achieved in a potentially cheaper way by rescaling single model ensemble forecasts a posteriori such that they become reliable. In this study a climate conserving recalibration (CCR) technique is derived and compared with MMEC. With a simple stochastic toy model it is shown that both CCR and MMEC successfully improve forecast reliability. The difference between these two methods is that CCR conserves resolution but inevitably dilutes the potentially predictable signal while MMEC is in the ideal case able to fully retain the predictable signal and to improve resolution. Therefore, MMEC is conceptually to be preferred, particularly since the effect of CCR depends on the length of the data record and on distributional assumptions. In reality, however, multimodels consist only of a finite number of participating single models, and the model errors are often correlated. Under such conditions, and depending on the skill metric applied, CCR-corrected single models can on average have comparable skill as multimodel ensembles, particularly when the potential model predictability is low. Using seasonal near-surface temperature and precipitation forecasts of three models of the Development of a European Multimodel Ensemble System for Seasonal-to-Interannual Prediction (DEMETER) dataset, it is shown that the conclusions drawn from the toy-model experiments hold equally in a real multimodel ensemble prediction system. All in all, it is not possible to make a general statement on whether CCR or MMEC is the better method. Rather it seems that optimum forecasts can be obtained by a combination of both methods, but only if first MMEC and then CCR is applied. The opposite order—first CCR, then MMEC—is shown to be of only little effect, at least in the context of seasonal forecasts.

scholarly journals GEPS-Based Monthly Prediction at the Canadian Meteorological Centre

2016 ◽  
Vol 144 (12) ◽  
pp. 4867-4883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hai Lin ◽  
Normand Gagnon ◽  
Stephane Beauregard ◽  
Ryan Muncaster ◽  
Marko Markovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
North America ◽  
Seasonal Prediction ◽  
Ensemble Prediction ◽  
Prediction System ◽  
Ensemble Prediction System ◽  
The Past ◽  
The Pacific ◽  
Summer Half ◽  
Forecasting System ◽  
Set Up

Abstract Dynamical monthly prediction at the Canadian Meteorological Centre (CMC) was produced as part of the seasonal forecasting system over the past two decades. A new monthly forecasting system, which has been in operation since July 2015, is set up based on the operational Global Ensemble Prediction System (GEPS). This monthly forecasting system is composed of two components: 1) the real-time forecast, where the GEPS is extended to 32 days every Thursday; and 2) a 4-member hindcast over the past 20 years, which is used to obtain the model climatology to calibrate the monthly forecast. Compared to the seasonal prediction system, the GEPS-based monthly forecasting system takes advantage of the increased model resolution and improved initialization. Forecasts of the past 2-yr period (2014 and 2015) are verified. Analysis is performed separately for the winter half-year (November–April), and the summer half-year (May–October). Weekly averages of 2-m air temperature (T2m) and 500-hPa geopotential height (Z500) are assessed. For Z500 in the Northern Hemisphere, limited skill can be found beyond week 2 (days 12–18) in summer, while in winter some skill exists over the Pacific and North American region beyond week 2. For T2m in North America, significant skill is found over a large part of the continent all the way to week 4 (days 26–32). The distribution of the wintertime T2m skill in North America is consistent with the influence of the Madden–Julian oscillation, indicating that a significant part of predictability likely comes from the tropics.

scholarly journals Space weather forecasting with a Multimodel Ensemble Prediction System (MEPS)

Radio Science ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (7) ◽  
pp. 1157-1165 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. W. Schunk ◽  
L. Scherliess ◽  
V. Eccles ◽  
L. C. Gardner ◽  
J. J. Sojka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Space Weather ◽  
Weather Forecasting ◽  
Ensemble Prediction ◽  
Prediction System ◽  
Multimodel Ensemble ◽  
Ensemble Prediction System ◽  
Space Weather Forecasting

scholarly journals Global Sea Surface Temperature Prediction Using a Multimodel Ensemble

2007 ◽  
Vol 135 (9) ◽  
pp. 3239-3247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong-Seong Kug ◽  
June-Yi Lee ◽  
In-Sik Kang
Keyword(s):  
Lead Time ◽  
Ensemble Methods ◽  
Seasonal Prediction ◽  
Ensemble Method ◽  
Ensemble Prediction ◽  
Prediction System ◽  
Ensemble Prediction System ◽  
Predictive Skill ◽  
Forecast Lead Time ◽  
Global Oceans

Abstract In a tier-two seasonal prediction system, prior to AGCM integration, global SSTs should first be predicted as a boundary condition to the AGCM. In this study, a global SST prediction system has been developed as a part of the tier-two seasonal prediction system. This system uses predictions from four models—one dynamic, two statistical, and persistence—and a simple composite ensemble method is applied to these models. The simple composite ensemble prediction system has predictive skill over most of the global oceans for up to a 6-month forecast lead time. The simple ensemble method is also compared with other more sophisticated ensemble methods. The simple composite method has forecast skill comparable to the other ensemble methods over the ENSO region and significantly better skill outside the ENSO region.

scholarly journals NCAR’s Experimental Real-Time Convection-Allowing Ensemble Prediction System

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 1645-1654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig S. Schwartz ◽  
Glen S. Romine ◽  
Ryan A. Sobash ◽  
Kathryn R. Fossell ◽  
Morris L. Weisman
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Ensemble Kalman Filter ◽  
Initial Conditions ◽  
Experimental System ◽  
Severe Weather ◽  
Ensemble Prediction ◽  
Limited Area ◽  
Prediction System ◽  
Ensemble Prediction System ◽  
Expository Paper

Abstract This expository paper documents an experimental, real-time, 10-member, 3-km, convection-allowing ensemble prediction system (EPS) developed at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) in spring 2015. The EPS is particularly unique in that continuously cycling, limited-area, mesoscale ensemble Kalman filter analyses provide diverse initial conditions. In addition to describing the EPS configurations, initial forecast assessments are presented that suggest the EPS can provide valuable severe weather guidance and skillful predictions of precipitation. The EPS output is available to operational forecasters, many of whom have incorporated the products into their toolboxes. Given such rapid embrace of an experimental system by the operational community, acceleration of convection-allowing EPS development is encouraged.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document