scholarly journals Explicit Filtering and Reconstruction Turbulence Modeling for Large-Eddy Simulation of Neutral Boundary Layer Flow

2005 ◽  
Vol 62 (7) ◽  
pp. 2058-2077 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fotini Katopodes Chow ◽  
Robert L. Street ◽  
Ming Xue ◽  
Joel H. Ferziger
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Boundary Layer Flow ◽  
Eddy Viscosity ◽  
Wall Stress ◽  
Stress Model ◽  
Viscosity Models ◽  
Neutral Boundary Layer ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Layer Flow ◽  
Near Wall

Abstract Standard turbulence closures for large-eddy simulations of atmospheric flow based on finite-difference or finite-volume codes use eddy-viscosity models and hence ignore the contribution of the resolved subfilter-scale stresses. These eddy-viscosity closures are unable to produce the expected logarithmic region near the surface in neutral boundary layer flows. Here, explicit filtering and reconstruction are used to improve the representation of the resolvable subfilter-scale (RSFS) stresses, and a dynamic eddy-viscosity model is used for the subgrid-scale (SGS) stresses. Combining reconstruction and eddy-viscosity models yields a sophisticated (and higher order) version of the well-known mixed model of Bardina et al.; the explicit filtering and reconstruction procedures clearly delineate the contribution of the RSFS and SGS motions. A near-wall stress model is implemented to supplement the turbulence models and account for the stress induced by filtering near a solid boundary as well as the effect of the large grid aspect ratio. Results for neutral boundary layer flow over a rough wall using the combined dynamic reconstruction model and the near-wall stress model show excellent agreement with similarity theory logarithmic velocity profiles, a significant improvement over standard eddy-viscosity closures. Stress profiles also exhibit the expected pattern with increased reconstruction level.

Investigation of Turbulent Boundary Layer Flow Over 2D Bump Using Highly Resolved Large Eddy Simulation

2011 ◽  
Vol 133 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dalibor Cavar ◽  
Knud Erik Meyer
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Boundary Layer Flow ◽  
Wall Region ◽  
Internal Layers ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Layer Flow ◽  
Near Wall ◽  
Non Equilibrium

A large eddy simulation (LES) study of turbulent non-equilibrium boundary layer flow over 2D Bump, at comparatively low Reynolds number Reh=U∞h/ν=1950, was conducted. A well-known LES issue of obtaining and sustaining turbulent flow inside the computational domain at such low Re, is addressed by conducting a precursor calculation of the spatially developing boundary layer flow. Those results were subsequently used as turbulent inflow database for the main non-equilibrium boundary layer flow computation. The Sagaut (Rech. Aero., pp. 51–63, 1996) sub grid scale (SGS) turbulence model, based on a local estimate of the subgrid scale turbulent kinetic energy ksgs and implicit damping of turbulent SGS viscosity νt(sgs) in the near-wall region, was selected as a suitable basis for the present LES computations due to the fact that block structured MPI parallelized CFD code used in the current computations did not provide a direct possibility for wall-damping of, e.g., the Smagorinsky constant in the near-wall region. The grid utilized in the main calculation consisted of approximately 9.4 × 106 grid points and the boundary layer flow results obtained, regarding both mean flow profiles and turbulence quantities, showed a good agreement with the available laser Doppler anemometry (LDA) measurements. Analysis of the flow was directly able to identify and confirm the existence of internal layers at positions related to the vicinity of the upstream and downstream discontinuities in the surface curvature and also partially confirm a close interdependency between generation and evolution of internal layers and the abrupt changes in the skin friction, previously reported in the literature.

A Method for the Calculation of 3D Boundary Layers on Practical Wing Configurations

1981 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. P. F. Lindhout ◽  
G. Moek ◽  
E. De Boer ◽  
B. Van Den Berg
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Boundary Layer Flow ◽  
Eddy Viscosity ◽  
Separated Flow ◽  
Laminar Boundary Layers ◽  
Eddy Viscosity Model ◽  
Airplane Wing ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer Flow ◽  
Layer Flow

This paper gives a description of a calculation method for 3D turbulent and laminar boundary layers on nondevelopable surfaces. A simple eddy viscosity model is incorporated in the method. Special attention is given to the organization of the computations to circumvent as much as possible stepsize limitations. The method is also able to proceed the computation around separated flow regions. The method has been applied to the laminar boundary layer flow over a flat plate with attached cylinder, and to a turbulent boundary layer flow over an airplane wing.

High-Pass Filtered Eddy-Viscosity Models for Large-Eddy Simulations of Compressible Wall-Bounded Flows

2005 ◽  
Vol 127 (4) ◽  
pp. 666-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffen Stolz
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Eddy Viscosity ◽  
Correct Prediction ◽  
Smagorinsky Model ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Viscosity Models ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
High Pass

In this contribution we consider large-eddy simulation (LES) using the high-pass filtered (HPF) Smagorinsky model of a spatially developing supersonic turbulent boundary layer at a Mach number of 2.5 and momentum-thickness Reynolds numbers at inflow of ∼4500. The HPF eddy-viscosity models employ high-pass filtered quantities instead of the full velocity field for the computation of the subgrid-scale (SGS) model terms. This approach has been proposed independently by Vreman (Vreman, A. W., 2003, Phys. Fluids, 15, pp. L61–L64) and Stolz et al. (Stolz, S., Schlatter, P., Meyer, D., and Kleiser, L., 2003, in Direct and Large Eddy Simulation V, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 81–88). Different from classical eddy-viscosity models, such as the Smagorinsky model (Smagorinsky, J., 1963, Mon. Weath. Rev, 93, pp. 99–164) or the structure-function model (Métais, O. and Lesieur, M., 1992, J. Fluid Mech., 239, pp. 157–194) which are among the most often employed SGS models for LES, the HPF eddy-viscosity models do need neither van Driest wall damping functions for a correct prediction of the viscous sublayer of wall-bounded turbulent flows nor a dynamic determination of the coefficient. Furthermore, the HPF eddy-viscosity models are formulated locally and three-dimensionally in space. For compressible flows the model is supplemented by a HPF eddy-diffusivity ansatz for the SGS heat flux in the energy equation. Turbulent inflow conditions are generated by a rescaling and recycling technique in which the mean and fluctuating part of the turbulent boundary layer at some distance downstream of inflow is rescaled and reintroduced at the inflow position (Stolz, S. and Adams, N. A., 2003, Phys. Fluids, 15, pp. 2389–2412).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document