Costs of Criminal Justice Involvement Among Persons With Serious Mental Illness in Connecticut

2013 ◽  
Vol 64 (7) ◽  
pp. 630-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey W. Swanson ◽  
Linda K. Frisman ◽  
Allison Gilbert Robertson ◽  
Hsiu-Ju Lin ◽  
Robert L. Trestman ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 66 (9) ◽  
pp. 907-909 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison G. Robertson ◽  
Jeffrey W. Swanson ◽  
Hsiuju Lin ◽  
Michele M. Easter ◽  
Linda K. Frisman ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (3/4) ◽  
pp. 168-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Leutwyler ◽  
Erin Hubbard ◽  
Elaine Zahnd

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss how case management can decrease recidivism for people with serious mental illness (SMI) because people with SMI are at high risk for incarceration and recidivism. Design/methodology/approach Examples of successful case management models for formerly incarcerated individuals with SMI found through a secondary analysis of qualitative data and an analysis of the literature are presented. Findings Currently, no international, national, or statewide guidelines exist to ensure that formerly incarcerated individuals with SMI receive case management upon community reentry despite evidence that such services can prevent further criminal justice involvement. Recommendations include establishment of and evaluation of best practices for case management. In addition, the authors recommend additional funding for case management with the goal of greatly increasing the number of individuals with SMI leaving the criminal justice system in their ability to access adequate case management. Originality/value Providing effective case management tailored to the needs of formerly incarcerated people with SMI improves their quality of life and reduces their involvement in the criminal justice system with clear positive outcomes for public safety and public health.


2020 ◽  
Vol 65 (6) ◽  
pp. 409-417
Author(s):  
Hanie Edalati ◽  
Tonia L. Nicholls ◽  
Christian G. Schütz ◽  
Julian M. Somers ◽  
Jino Distasio ◽  
...  

Objectives: Exposure to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) is associated with increased risk of criminal justice involvement and repeated victimization among homeless individuals. This study aimed to (1) examine whether the relationship between cumulative ACE score and odds of experiencing criminal justice involvement and victimization remains significant over time after receiving the Housing First (HF) intervention and (2) investigate the moderating effect of cumulative ACE score on the effectiveness of the HF intervention on the likelihood of experiencing these outcomes among homeless individuals with mental illnesses. Methods: We used longitudinal data over the 2-year follow-up period from the At Home/ Chez Soi demonstration project that provided HF versus treatment as usual (TAU) to homeless adults with mental illness in five Canadian cities (N = 1,888). Results: In all 4 follow-up time points, the relationship between cumulative ACE score and both outcomes remained significant, regardless of study arm (HF vs. TAU) and other confounding factors. However, cumulative ACE score did not moderate intervention effects on odds of experiencing either outcome, suggesting that the effectiveness of HF versus TAU, with regard to the odds of being victimized or criminal justice involvement, did not differ by cumulative ACE scores over the course of study. Conclusions: Findings suggest that providing services for homeless individuals with mental illness should be trauma informed and include specialized treatment strategies targeting the experience of ACEs and trauma to improve their treatment outcomes. An intensive approach is required to directly address the problem of criminal justice involvement and victimization in these individuals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document