Case management helps prevent criminal justice recidivism for people with serious mental illness

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (3/4) ◽  
pp. 168-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Leutwyler ◽  
Erin Hubbard ◽  
Elaine Zahnd

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss how case management can decrease recidivism for people with serious mental illness (SMI) because people with SMI are at high risk for incarceration and recidivism. Design/methodology/approach Examples of successful case management models for formerly incarcerated individuals with SMI found through a secondary analysis of qualitative data and an analysis of the literature are presented. Findings Currently, no international, national, or statewide guidelines exist to ensure that formerly incarcerated individuals with SMI receive case management upon community reentry despite evidence that such services can prevent further criminal justice involvement. Recommendations include establishment of and evaluation of best practices for case management. In addition, the authors recommend additional funding for case management with the goal of greatly increasing the number of individuals with SMI leaving the criminal justice system in their ability to access adequate case management. Originality/value Providing effective case management tailored to the needs of formerly incarcerated people with SMI improves their quality of life and reduces their involvement in the criminal justice system with clear positive outcomes for public safety and public health.

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 701-713
Author(s):  
Michael A. Cummings ◽  
Charles Scott ◽  
Juan Carlos Arguello ◽  
Ai-Li W. Arias ◽  
Ashley M. Breth ◽  
...  

AbstractThe Cal-DSH Diversion Guidelines provide 10 general guidelines that jurisdictions should consider when developing diversion programs for individuals with a serious mental illness (SMI) who become involved in the criminal justice system. Screening for SMI in a jail setting is reviewed. In addition, important treatment interventions for SMI and substance use disorders are highlighted with the need to address criminogenic risk factors highlighted.


2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 312-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur J. Lurigio

This article describes the major factors that have led to the criminalization of persons with serious mental illness (PSMIs), and it presents several core principles for improving the care of PSMIs in the criminal justice system. These principles include mental health training for criminal justice staff, pretrial diversion projects, coordinated services for criminally involved PSMIs, integrated treatment for PSMIs with co-occurring disorders, aftercare linkage for PSMIs released from jails and prisons, continuous care models with single-point access to services for PSMIs with lengthy records of hospitalization and arrest, and more and better research on PSMIs involved in the criminal justice system.


CNS Spectrums ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 577-583
Author(s):  
Helga Thordarson ◽  
Tiffany Rector

Trauma-informed approaches offer a new perspective for understanding how and why individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) become entangled in the criminal justice system. There is growing awareness that many individuals with SMI have experienced significant life trauma, and factors beyond SMI that contribute to criminalization are being identified; however, the role of trauma continues to be overlooked in many formulations. In trauma-blind systems, trauma-related behaviors are often misunderstood and met with responses that exacerbate psychiatric and behavioral problems. Trauma-informed approaches provide a richer understanding of underlying drivers of behavior, and view trauma as an integral component of risk management, case formulation, relationship-based care, and referral. Embedding trauma-informed principles across organizations promotes continuity of care, safety, and more compassionate cultures that help reduce the flow of individuals with SMI into the criminal justice system. An expanded view of the criminalization hypothesis is offered, which incorporates all factors addressed in current research.


Author(s):  
Anna Scheyett ◽  
Katherine J. Crawford

This chapter addresses the intersection of mental health and the criminal justice system. Individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) are at higher risk of involvement with the criminal justice system and at greater risk of more severe sentencing. Mental Health America estimates that 20% of persons on death row have a serious mental illness. Someone who was actively mentally ill at the time of a crime, but who has received treatment and is now stable, will proceed to trial as death eligible. This chapter holds that, as the majority of mental health professionals, social workers have a responsibility for educating lawmakers, community members, and those in the criminal justice system, as well as other practitioners about the multiple levels of injustice and inequity surrounding individuals with SMI and the criminal justice system. These issues range from inadequate and inconsistent treatment in the community, jails, and prisons to differential sentencing practices.


2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S228-S228
Author(s):  
Adria Zern ◽  
Luca Pauselli ◽  
Michael T Compton

Abstract Background Individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) are over-represented in the criminal justice system. One factor that impacts likelihood of incarceration is criminal thinking, and the Criminal Sentiments Scale – Modified (CSS-M) has been shown to predict recidivism. However, no one has examined the CSS-M in outpatients with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, and little is known about what predicts high CSS-M scores. Methods The data for the current investigation comes from a larger sample of individuals with SMI receiving services from outpatient mental health clinics who were enrolled in a randomized-controlled trial. The CSS-M was verbally administered to everyone during a baseline assessment. The 264 individuals in the sample all have a diagnosis of schizophrenia or another psychotic disorder, and all had been arrested in the last five years. We first explored the impact of demographic factors and adverse childhood experiences (ACE) on CSS-M scores. For the 258 participants with complete data for all five sub-scales (attitudes towards law, attitudes towards courts, attitudes towards police, tolerance for law violations, and identification with criminal others), we conducted a hierarchical analysis using Ward’s method to explore and define the number of clusters. We determined the number of clusters using the Elbow method. We then repeated the cluster analysis using a non-hierarchical method with the K-means technique and fixing the number of clusters to three. Results The current sample exhibited considerably higher CSS-M scores than those previously published (mean = 32.0±14.4). The total CSS-M score demonstrated high reliability (alpha = 0.898), and four of the sub-scales exhibited moderate to high reliability (α,Law = 0.741; α,Courts = 0.808; α,Police = 0.762; α,TLV = 0.696). When controlling for age, race, gender, and ACE score, the multiple linear regression model accounted for 8.6% of the variability in total CSS-M score (p < 0.001), though only ACE score and age were significant predictors (β = 0.218, p = 0.001; β = -0.167, p = 0.008, respectively). The cluster analysis produced three clusters. Given that the ICO sub-scale had the lowest Cronbach’s alpha (α = 0.328), we repeated the cluster analysis process with the four other sub-scales, which confirmed the three clusters. An ANOVA with the four sub-scales and total CSS-M score showed that the three clusters could be defined as those with low, medium, and high scores on the scales. Confirming the results from the MLR, an ANOVA of the three clusters with ACE scores (F= 4.49, p = 0.012) and age (F = 3.77, p = 0.024) were both significant. Discussion The average total CSS-M score is considerably higher than previous investigations. Both high ACE scores and younger age significantly predicted higher CSS-M scores. Because CSS-M scores have been shown to predict recidivism, it is critical to further understand the foundation of these negative attitudes towards the criminal justice system to prevent the continued over-representation of people with serious mental illness in the criminal justice system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document