Predictors of Engagement With Mental Health Services Among Mothers of Children at Risk of Maltreatment

2012 ◽  
Vol 63 (9) ◽  
pp. 913-919 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Thompson ◽  
Jiyoung Kim Tabone ◽  
Joan M. Cook
2021 ◽  
pp. 251610322110342
Author(s):  
Sonya J. Leathers ◽  
Beth L. Vande Voort ◽  
Catherine Melka-Kaffer

Children at risk for placement instability are subpopulation in out-of-home care with a critical need for enhanced mental health services, but little is known about the types and adequacy of the mental services they receive. This descriptive study sought to identify the types of mental health services and psychotropic medications provided to children with a risk for moves, foster parents’ perceptions of their adequacy, consistency of therapy services with evidence-based models, and racial and gender differences in service provision. Foster parents completed telephone surveys for a randomly selected sample of 144 children aged 8–14 in specialized or traditional family foster care with a history of placement moves or hospitalizations in a large state in the US. Over two-thirds of children were reported to have mental health diagnoses, with ADHD most frequent (52%). Most children with a diagnosis received psychotherapy (75%) and psychotropic medications (90%). The majority did not receive additional services. A quarter received therapy supporting use of behavioral interventions in foster homes, with 40% of foster parents reporting this was inadequate. Additionally, half reported inadequate initial training. No racial differences in services were reported. However, girls were more likely to receive therapy described as trauma-focused than boys (30.9% and 5.6%, respectively); more boys received treatment for anger (17%) and psychotropic medication (60%). Findings indicate that children at risk for multiple moves receive a high level of services, but questions are raised about the content and adequacy of these services. Evidence-based psychosocial interventions are needed to support positive outcomes and potentially reduce psychotropic medication use.


2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (8) ◽  
pp. 1313-1321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Ferlatte ◽  
Travis Salway ◽  
Simon Rice ◽  
John L. Oliffe ◽  
Ashleigh J. Rich ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 96-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Francesconi ◽  
A. Minichino ◽  
R.E. Carrión ◽  
R. Delle Chiaie ◽  
A. Bevilacqua ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundAccuracy of risk algorithms for psychosis prediction in “at risk mental state” (ARMS) samples may differ according to the recruitment setting. Standardized criteria used to detect ARMS individuals may lack specificity if the recruitment setting is a secondary mental health service. The authors tested a modified strategy to predict psychosis conversion in this setting by using a systematic selection of trait-markers of the psychosis prodrome in a sample with a heterogeneous ARMS status.Methods138 non-psychotic outpatients (aged 17–31) were consecutively recruited in secondary mental health services and followed-up for up to 3 years (mean follow-up time, 2.2 years; SD = 0.9). Baseline ARMS status, clinical, demographic, cognitive, and neurological soft signs measures were collected. Cox regression was used to derive a risk index.Results48% individuals met ARMS criteria (ARMS-Positive, ARMS+). Conversion rate to psychosis was 21% for the overall sample, 34% for ARMS+, and 9% for ARMS-Negative (ARMS−). The final predictor model with a positive predictive validity of 80% consisted of four variables: Disorder of Thought Content, visuospatial/constructional deficits, sensory-integration, and theory-of-mind abnormalities. Removing Disorder of Thought Content from the model only slightly modified the predictive accuracy (−6.2%), but increased the sensitivity (+9.5%).ConclusionsThese results suggest that in a secondary mental health setting the use of trait-markers of the psychosis prodrome may predict psychosis conversion with great accuracy despite the heterogeneity of the ARMS status. The use of the proposed predictive algorithm may enable a selective recruitment, potentially reducing duration of untreated psychosis and improving prognostic outcomes.


Significance While the pandemic has both amplified and illuminated areas of racial, gender and economic inequality, it has also overshadowed a range of worsening societal problems that had already reached crisis levels prior to COVID-19. Impacts Surging firearm sales during the pandemic and changing perceptions of policing will have long-term impacts on violence levels. The impact of the pandemic has reversed some recent success in containing the opioid epidemic and flattening suicide rates. Mental health services are at risk of cuts as they have lower reimbursement rates for providers than other healthcare provisions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document