scholarly journals Implementing Integrated Mental Health and Chaplain Care in a National Quality Improvement Initiative

2017 ◽  
Vol 68 (12) ◽  
pp. 1213-1215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason A. Nieuwsma ◽  
Heather A. King ◽  
George L. Jackson ◽  
Balmatee Bidassie ◽  
Laura W. Wright ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
National Quality ◽  
Integrated Mental Health

A quality improvement project to reduce restrictive interventions in a mental health service

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Darren Savarimuthu ◽  
Katja Jung
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Essential Elements ◽  
Quality Improvement Project ◽  
Psychiatric Ward ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Improvement Project

Background/aims This article describes a quality improvement project that aimed to reduce restrictive interventions on an acute psychiatric ward. In light of a service level agreement and based on a trust-wide target, the purpose of the project was to reduce restrictive interventions by 20% within a period of 6 months. It was also anticipated that a least restrictive environment could have a positive impact on patient experience. Methods Three evidence-based interventions were introduced to the ward during the quality improvement project. These included positive behaviour support, the Safewards model and the productive ward initiative. Results There was a 63% reduction in restrictive interventions over a 6-month period through the successful implementation of a series of evidence-based interventions to manage behaviours that challenge on the mental health ward. Conclusions The project identified collaborative team working, staff training and adequate resources as essential elements in the success of the quality improvement initiative. However, co-production was found to be crucially significant in bringing sustainable changes in ward environment and in addressing restrictive practices.

scholarly journals Shifting to Remotely Delivered Mental Health Care: Quality Improvement in the COVID-19 Pandemic

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Daigle ◽  
Abraham Rudnick
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Mental Health Care ◽  
Health Care Quality ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Health Clinic ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
Service Users ◽  
Specialized Mental Health

This paper presents an organizational (ambulatory) case study of shifting mental health care from in-person to remote service delivery due to the current (COVID-19) pandemic as a rapid quality improvement initiative. Remotely delivered mental health care, particularly using synchronous video and phone, has been shown to be cost-effective, especially for rural service users. Our provincial specialized mental health clinic rapidly shifted to such remote delivery during the current pandemic. We report on processes and outputs of this rapid quality improvement initiative, which serves a purpose beyond pandemic circumstances, such as improving access to such specialized mental health care for rural and other service users at any time. In conclusion, shifting specialized mental health care from in-person to remotely delivered services as much as possible could be beneficial beyond the current pandemic. More research is needed to optimize the implementation of such a shift.

scholarly journals Monitoring of older HIV‐1‐positive adults by HIV clinics in the United Kingdom: a national quality improvement initiative

HIV Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 409-417
Author(s):  
N Ekong ◽  
H Curtis ◽  
E Ong ◽  
CA Sabin ◽  
D Chadwick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United Kingdom ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
National Quality ◽  
Hiv 1

Databases for assessing the outcomes of the treatment of patients with congenital and paediatric cardiac disease – the perspective of cardiology

2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (S2) ◽  
pp. 116-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathy J. Jenkins ◽  
Robert H. Beekman III ◽  
Lisa J. Bergersen ◽  
Allen D. Everett ◽  
Thomas J. Forbes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Cardiac Disease ◽  
Interventional Cardiology ◽  
National Database ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
Paediatric Cardiology ◽  
Data Registry ◽  
National Quality ◽  
Adult Congenital ◽  
The Impact

AbstractThis review includes a brief discussion, from the perspective of the pediatric cardiologist, of the rationale for creation and maintenance of multi-institutional databases of outcomes of the treatment of patients with congenital and paediatric cardiac disease, together with a history of the evolution of such databases, and a description of the current state of the art. A number of projects designed to have broad-based impact are currently in the design phase, or have already been implemented. Not surprisingly, most of the efforts thus far have focused on catheterization procedures and interventions, although some work examining other aspects of paediatric cardiology practice is also beginning. This review briefly describes several European and North American initiatives related to databases for pediatric and congenital cardiology including the Central Cardiac Audit Database of the United Kingdom, national database initiatives for pediatric cardiology in Switzerland and Germany, various database initiatives under the leadership of the Working Groups of The Association for European Paediatric Cardiology, the IMPACT Registry™ (IMproving Pediatric and Adult Congenital Treatment) of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry® of The American College of Cardiology Foundation® and The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI), the Mid-Atlantic Group of Interventional Cardiology (MAGIC) Catheterization Outcomes Project, the Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Project on Outcomes (C3PO), the Congenital Cardiovascular Interventional Study Consortium (CCISC), and the Joint Council on Congenital Heart Disease (JCCHD) National Quality Improvement Initiative. These projects, each leveraging multicentre data and collaboration, demonstrate the enormous progress that has occurred over the last several years to improve the quality and consistency of information about nonsurgical treatment for congenital cardiac disease. The paediatric cardiology field is well-poised to move quickly beyond outcome assessment and benchmarking, to collaborative quality improvement.

Peer review in radiotherapy (RT): A national quality improvement initiative.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 221-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Donald Brundage ◽  
Brenda H Bass ◽  
Sophie Foxcroft ◽  
Ross Halperin ◽  
Thomas McGowan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Radiation Oncology ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Steering Committee ◽  
Perceived Barriers ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
Implementation Framework ◽  
National Quality

221 Background: Peer review (PR) in Radiation Oncology has been shown to be effective in improving quality of treatment by detecting and correcting deficiencies in proposed treatment plans prior to treatment. PR is also effective in: guiding departmental treatment planning policies and processes; reducing variation in practice; providing a venue for multi-disciplinary communication, and increasing staff and trainee awareness of evolving treatment processes. The importance of PR is reflected in the inclusion of 3 PR-specific quality indicators in the Canadian Partnership for Quality Radiotherapy QA Guidelines for Radiation Oncology programs. Given this endorsement, we aim to enhance PR implementation across all Canadian cancer centres using a knowledge-translation and implementation framework. Methods: This project will facilitate increased uptake of PR in Canadian RT programs by implementing the top-down model used with success in Ontario. This model has several key components, including: a) engaging the leadership of provincial cancer agencies to promote PR at every Provincial cancer centre; b) providing modest financial support for the acquisition of the required hardware and/or staff time for coordinating PR activities; c) systematic collection of each centre’s baseline PR activities, perceived barriers and potential facilitators of PR at each centre; d) creation of a continuous quality improvement cycle by monitoring PR quality indicators over time; e) systematic knowledge and information sharing regarding effective PR processes. Results: Funding for this initiative was obtained from the Canadian Partnership against Cancer (CPAC) in April 2014. A steering committee consisting of stakeholders from across Canada has been struck and provincial launches, based on the tenets used in Ontario, have commenced in 7 of 13 provinces with others expressing interest. A national survey to obtain baseline data relating to PR activities, perceived barriers, and facilitators is underway and will be reported. Conclusions: Preliminary evidence suggests a “snowball effect” of increasing PR uptake across Canada. The implementation model could be applied in other jurisdictions interested in increasing PR in radiation oncology.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document