paediatric cardiology
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

341
(FIVE YEARS 44)

H-INDEX

14
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Casans ◽  
Mithilesh Lal ◽  
Michael Griksaitis ◽  
Christopher Wren

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_G) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Avesani ◽  
Giacomo Calvo ◽  
Jolanda Sabatino ◽  
Domenico Sirico ◽  
Biagio Castaldi ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims To describe the current application of exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) in our Paediatric Cardiology Departments. Methods and results Baseline and under stress symptoms, vital parameters, ECG, and echocardiograms from patients who underwent ESE in our centres, were retrospectively analysed and compared, as well as clinical management plans formulated based on ESEs results. Forty-five patients from Centre 1 (median age 16 years), including 87% of patients with congenital heart diseases (CHDs), and 20 patients from Centre 2 (median age 11 years), mainly tested to rule out myocardial ischemia, were included. Among patients from Centre 1, 28 had previously been treated surgically, 6 percutaneously, and 11 were under follow-up. Indications for ESE/patients’ native diagnosis are illustrated in the picture. Centre 1: Exercise was maximal in 17 patients, with 2 of them having symptoms at the peak of exercise. It was stopped beforehand in 28 patients because of dyspnoea (3) and muscle fatigue (25). No arrhythmia was detected. ESE was considered as positive in 14 patients; after that, 3 patients underwent percutaneous interventions, 2 underwent cardiac surgery, 3 received indication for cardiac catheterization, 4 for advanced cardiac imaging, and 2 for exercise restriction and medical therapy. Centre 2: 15 patients (75%) completed the exercise, and none of them developed symptoms. In the remaining 25%, exercise was stopped because of muscle exhaustion. No arrhythmia was detected, and all the ESEs were negative. Comparing the cohorts, no differences in terms of ejection fraction were noticed at rest and under stress. Patients in cohort 1 were older (P = 0.002), they achieved lower average maximal heart rate (P = 0.0001), performed less lasting exercise (P = 0.05), and ESE was maximal less frequently (P = 0.005). Lastly, they had significant changes in clinical decisions (P = 0.004). Conclusions In paediatric cardiology, particularly in children with CHDs, ESE is a promising technique and could influence significantly clinical management plans.


2021 ◽  
pp. 261-280
Author(s):  
Anna Smajdor ◽  
Jonathan Herring ◽  
Robert Wheeler

This chapter covers Ethico-legal issues by medical specialism and includes topics on the following subjects (N-V): Neurology: The clash of rights between a child and parents, Neonatal Surgery: Jehovah’s Witnesses, Neonatology: Consent, Neurosurgery: Information Governance, Neurosurgery: Innovation, Neurosurgery: Preservation of Evidence, Obstetrics: Needle Phobia, Ophthalmology: Statutory Disclosures, Paediatric Cardiology: Unlicensed Equipment, Plastics; Disclosure, Renal: Capacitous adult refusing treatment, Respiratory: Unwise Decisions, Speech: Capacity, Rheumatology: Doctrine of Double Effect, Trauma & Orthopaedics: Necessity, Urology: DOLS, Vascular Surgery: Disclosure


Author(s):  
Ahmed Kassab ◽  
Ying Chee ◽  
Yogen Singh ◽  
Wilf Kelsall

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-99
Author(s):  
ABM Abdus Salam ◽  
HM Mozammel

Abstract not available Cardiovasc j 2021; 14(1): 97-99


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Lisa J. Gregorcyk ◽  
Michael Kelleman ◽  
Matthew E. Oster

Abstract Background: Loss of follow-up is a barrier to providing adequate care to paediatric cardiac patients. The purpose of this study was to determine variables associated with loss of appropriate paediatric cardiology follow-up, including potentially modifiable factors. We hypothesised having earlier recommend follow-up intervals was associated with less likelihood of loss of follow-up. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients >5 years old seen in a large, outpatient paediatric practice from 2013 to 2016. Subjects were considered to be lost to follow-up if they did not have a subsequent outpatient encounter by 6 months after their recommend follow-up time interval. Results: Of the 8940 eligible patients, 45.9% were lost to follow-up. Recommended follow-up interval of 1 year was associated with less loss of follow-up (41.4%) as compared to 2-year intervals (51.6%) and 3 years (55.7%) (p < 0.001 for both). Other significant predictors of loss of follow-up included less severe heart disease, older age, and non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity. Sex and payor type were not significant predictors. In the stratified analyses by severity of disease and age, longer recommended follow-up time was associated with greater loss of follow-up among all severity and age categories. Conclusions: Almost half of the patients in our cohort did not return to clinic within the recommended timeline. Shorter follow-up time was associated with less loss of follow-up among all categories of disease severity and age groups. Recommending shorter follow-up intervals may be one initiative for paediatric cardiologists to improve rates of follow-up.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Ellis Rochelson ◽  
Bradley C. Clark ◽  
Kara S. Motonaga

Abstract Introduction: Paediatric cardiology fellows, tasked with studying a large and dynamic field, may benefit from a quick-access digital resource that reflects contemporary practice. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a paediatric cardiology handbook smartphone app in enhancing the accessibility of information such as guidelines and recommendations for paediatric cardiology fellows. Materials and methods: The Peds Cardiology Handbook app (iOS) was designed using XCode and Swift programming. A pre-app survey and download instructions were sent to the US paediatric cardiology fellows, followed by a post-app survey. Fellows were asked to rate the ease of rapid access to various types of information. Responses were compared pre- and post-app using McNemar’s test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Two-hundred and thirty paediatric cardiology fellows were contacted; 23% (n = 53) completed both the pre- and post-app surveys and were included for analysis. After using the app, fellows found it easier to quickly access information in eight out of nine domains evaluated (p < 0.05). All fellows found the app easy to use (100%), most felt that the app was well-organised (98%), contained reliable information (92%), and was useful for finding quick answers to clinical questions (87%). Discussion: The Peds Cardiology Handbook iPhone app is a useful, reliable tool that provides quick access to high-yield information, including guidelines and references. Overall, paediatric cardiology fellows found it easier to rapidly access clinically relevant information after using the app. Future studies may be necessary to evaluate long-term use and impact on evidence-based practice.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Melissa K. Cousino ◽  
Blyth T. Lord ◽  
Elizabeth D. Blume

Abstract Workshop proceedings, priorities, and recommendations from the “State of the Science and Future Directions in Palliative and End-of-Life Care in Pediatric Cardiology,” a Harvard Radcliffe Accelerator Workshop, are detailed. Eight priorities for research were identified, including patient and family decision making, communication, patient and family experience, patient symptom measurement and management, training and curriculum development, teamwork, family hardships and bereavement, and ethical considerations. Barriers to research in this area were also identified: lack of outcome/measurement tools, lack of research funding, small population sizes, lack of effort/protected time for research, undervalued research topic by field and colleagues, and heterogeneous research participant diversity. Priorities and barriers were mostly consistent with those reported by the field of paediatric palliative care at large. These collective, consensus-based findings from diverse, multidisciplinary leaders in the field, as well as parent representatives, provide a catalyst for scientific advancement specific to paediatric and end-of-life care in paediatric cardiology.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document