Case Management, Quality of Life, and Satisfaction With Services of Long-Term Psychiatric Patients

1992 ◽  
Vol 43 (8) ◽  
pp. 799-802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Huxley ◽  
Richard Warner
2002 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Björkman ◽  
L. Hansson

SummaryOne hundred and thirteen long-term mentally ill clients receiving case management were investigated with regard to psychosocial and clinical predictors of changes in subjective quality of life during an 18-month follow-up. Better psychosocial functioning and fewer psychiatric symptoms at baseline predicted a greater improvement in quality of life. A larger decrease in symptom severity and a greater improvement in the social network during the follow-up were identified as the most important predictors of a greater improvement in subjective quality of life. The results of the study suggest that an emphasis should be put on effective symptom management, a reduction of needs for care and social support in order to fulfill the aims of improving subjective quality of life in patients receiving case management.


2003 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather D. Hadjistavropoulos ◽  
Mark Sagan ◽  
Cecily Bierlein ◽  
Karen Lawson

This study documents the development of a new tool to measure the quality of community case management for elderly clients. Information obtained from literature review, client focus groups, and pilot surveys with clients served as the basis for the development of a Case Management Quality Questionnaire (CMQQ). This measure, along with satisfaction, health status, and demographic questions, was administered to 174 home care clients and 78 family members of long term care residents for evaluation of case management services that clients had received in the last 2 to 6 months. Principal components analysis with oblique (Oblimin) rotation identified three subscales of the CMQQ: (1) accessibility, (2) efficiency, and (3) assessment/coordination skill. Study findings suggest that the CMQQ is reliable, valid, and of value in understanding satisfaction with case coordination. Based on client feedback and analysis of the results, some future modifications to the measure are worthy of study. Others interested in measuring and improving case management may similarly benefit from the use of the CMQQ.


1999 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 684-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryanne O'Donnell ◽  
Gordon Parker ◽  
Miriam Proberts ◽  
Robert Matthews ◽  
Danielle Fisher ◽  
...  

Objective: The study investigated the provision of client-focused services to community-based clients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. It hypothesised that the delivery of more client-focused services would improve client outcome in terms of functioning, disability and satisfaction with services. Client-focused services were developed using an empowerment model of case management and by the addition of consumer advocates. Method: Clients referred for case management were randomly allocated to one of three groups: standard case management (n = 35), client-focused case management (n = 39), or client-focused case management plus consumer advocacy (n = 45). Measures of functioning, disability, quality of life, burden of care and service satisfaction were measured at baseline and 12 months. Outcome data were collected concerning number and duration of hospital readmission, crisis intervention and compliance with treatment and services. Results: While there were no differences between the groups on quantitative measures of functioning, disability, quality of life, service satisfaction and burden of care, there were significant between-group differences on qualitative measures of satisfaction with services. Conclusions: Several methodological difficulties hampered interpretation of the findings. Although clients did not differ on outcome measures of functioning and disability, the group receiving client-focused case management reported greater satisfaction with service delivery.


1999 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisbet Borge ◽  
Egil W. Martinsen ◽  
Torleif Ruud ◽  
Øyvind Watne ◽  
Svein Friis

Author(s):  
Nina Simmons-Mackie

Abstract Purpose: This article addresses several intervention approaches that aim to improve life for individuals with severe aphasia. Because severe aphasia significantly compromises language, often for the long term, recommended approaches focus on additional domains that affect quality of life. Treatments are discussed that involve increasing participation in personally relevant life situations, enhancing environmental support for communication and participation, and improving communicative confidence. Methods: Interventions that have been suggested in the aphasia literature as particularly appropriate for people with severe aphasia include training in total communication, training of communication partners, and activity specific training. Conclusion: Several intervention approaches can be implemented to enhance life with severe aphasia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document