Portal Vein Resection for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma

2006 ◽  
Vol 72 (7) ◽  
pp. 599-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan W. Hemming ◽  
Robin D. Kim ◽  
Kristin L. Mekeel ◽  
Shiro Fujita ◽  
Alan I. Reed ◽  
...  

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma remains a difficult challenge for the surgeon. Achieving negative surgical margins when resecting this relatively uncommon tumor is technically demanding as a result of the close proximity of the bile duct bifurcation to the vascular inflow of the liver. A recent advance in surgical treatment is the addition of portal vein resection to the procedure. Resection of the portal vein increases the number of patients offered a potentially curative approach but is technically more difficult and may increase the risk of the procedure. This study reviews the results of portal vein resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Between 1998 and 2005, 60 patients underwent potentially curative resections of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Mean patient age was 64 ± 12 years (range, 24–85 years). Liver resections performed along with biliary resection included 49 trisegmentectomies (37 right, 12 left) and 10 lobectomies (8 left, 2 right). One patient had only the bile duct resected. Four patients also had simultaneous pancreaticoduodenectomy performed. Twenty-six patients required portal vein resection and reconstruction to achieve negative margins, 3 of which also required reconstruction of the hepatic artery. Operative mortality was 8 per cent with an overall complication rate of 40 per cent. Patients who underwent portal vein resection had an operative mortality of 4 per cent, which was not different from the 12 per cent mortality in patients who did not undergo portal vein resection (P = 0.39). There was no difference in actuarial patient survival between patients who underwent portal vein resection and those who did not (5-year survival 39 per cent vs. 41 per cent, P = not significant). Negative margins were achieved in 80 per cent of cases and were associated with improved survival (P < 0.01). Five-year actuarial survival in patients undergoing resection with negative margins was 45 per cent. There was no difference in margin status or long-term survival between those patients who underwent portal vein resection and those who did not. Only negative margin status was associated with improved survival by multivariate analysis. Portal vein resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma is safe and allows a chance for long-term survival in otherwise unresectable patients.

Surgery ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 158 (5) ◽  
pp. 1252-1260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrin Hoffmann ◽  
Stephan Luible ◽  
Benjamin Goeppert ◽  
Karl-Heinz Weiss ◽  
Ulf Hinz ◽  
...  

Surgery ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 159 (3) ◽  
pp. 986-987
Author(s):  
Moritz Schmelzle ◽  
Robert Sucher ◽  
Daniel Seehofer ◽  
Johann Pratschke

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentina Beltrame ◽  
Mario Gruppo ◽  
Sergio Pedrazzoli ◽  
Stefano Merigliano ◽  
Davide Pastorelli ◽  
...  

The aim of the present study was to determine the outcome of patients undergoing pancreatic resection with (VR+) or without (VR−) mesenteric-portal vein resection for pancreatic carcinoma. Between January 1998 and December 2012, 241 patients with pancreatic cancer underwent pancreatic resection: in 64 patients, surgery included venous resection for macroscopic invasion of mesenteric-portal vein axis. Morbidity and mortality did not differ between the two groups (VR+: 29% and 3%; VR−: 30% and 4.0%, resp.). Radical resection was achieved in 55/64 (78%) in the VR+ group and in 126/177 (71%) in the VR− group. Vascular invasion was histologically proven in 44 (69%) of the VR+ group. Survival curves were not statistically different between the two groups. Mean and median survival time were 26 and 15 months, respectively, in VR− versus 20 and 14 months, respectively, in VR+ groupp=0.52. In the VR+ group, only histologically proven vascular invasion significantly impacted survivalp=0.02, while, in the VR− group, R0 resectionp=0.001and tumor’s gradingp=0.01significantly influenced long-term survival. Vascular resection during pancreatectomy can be performed safely, with acceptable morbidity and mortality. Long-term survival was the same, with or without venous resection. Survival was worse for patients with histologically confirmed vascular infiltration.


2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (4) ◽  
pp. 471-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Hoon Lee ◽  
Dae Wook Hwang ◽  
Sang Yeup Lee ◽  
Kwang-Min Park ◽  
Young-Joo Lee

Achieving an R0 resection can be difficult for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) because of the anatomic structures of the hepatic hilum and frequent tumor infiltration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the margin status of bile duct resected in HC and prognostic impact of R1 resection. Between 2000 and 2009, 245 patients underwent operation for HC at Asan Medical Center. We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathologic features and surgical outcomes, focusing on the proximal margin status, of 162 cases of patients with curative intention. Curative resections were achieved in 125 (52.1%) patients, and R1 resections were performed in 43 (26.5%). Proximal ductal margin states were classified as free margin (73.5%), carcinoma in situ (3.7%), and invasive carcinoma (22.8%). The 3- and 5-year survival rates of the R1 group (39.5% and 34.9%) were not significantly different from the rates of the R0 group (55.5% and 44.5%, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed lymph node metastasis ( P = 0.001) and histologic differentiation ( P = 0.001) were independent predictors of patient survival. The aggressive surgical approach based on liver resection including caudate lobe may increase the number of patients eligible for a curative chance and improve long-term survival even if the microscopically positive margin is still achieved.


2017 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. S446-S447
Author(s):  
M. Gaspersz ◽  
S. Buettner ◽  
J. van Vugt ◽  
E. Roos ◽  
R. Coelen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document