Validation of Mucosal Sutureless Pancreatojejunostomy after Pancreatoduodenectomy

2014 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoichi Ishizaki ◽  
Jiro Yoshimoto ◽  
Hiroyuki Sugo ◽  
Hiroshi Imamura ◽  
Seiji Kawasaki

Although duct-to-mucosa pancreatojejunostomy has been considered safer than other techniques, this procedure is particularly difficult when the pancreatic duct is small. It has therefore become increasingly necessary to develop a simple mucosal sutureless pancreatojejunostomy technique to replace the conventional hand-sewing one. Two hundred fourteen patients who underwent mucosal sutureless pancreatojejunostomy were classified into two groups: those with a normal pancreatic duct diameter (less than 3 mm, n = 97) and those with a dilated pancreatic duct (3 mm or greater, n = 117). The rate of clinically significant pancreatic fistula (Grade B or C by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula definition) among the patients as a whole was 8 per cent. The overall incidence of pancreatic fistula was significantly higher in the patients with a pancreatic duct diameter of less than 3 mm than in those with a pancreatic duct diameter of 3 mm or greater. However, the incidence of clinically significant pancreatic fistula did not differ between the groups (less than 3 mm, 11%; 3 mm or greater, 5%; P = 0.09). Grade C pancreatic fistula developed in one patient with a pancreatic duct diameter of less than 3 mm and in two with a pancreatic duct diameter 3 mm or greater. Although two patients required reoperation, all of the fistulas were cured and the postoperative mortality rate related to pancreatoduodenectomy was zero. Mucosal sutureless pancreatojejunostomy combined with pancreatic duct stenting is associated with a low rate of clinically significant pancreatic fistula even in patients with a small pancreatic duct diameter less than 3 mm.

HPB ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian P. Chen ◽  
Sean Bennett ◽  
Kimberly A. Bertens ◽  
Fady K. Balaa ◽  
Guillaume Martel

2007 ◽  
Vol 245 (3) ◽  
pp. 443-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wande B. Pratt ◽  
Shishir K. Maithel ◽  
Tsafrir Vanounou ◽  
Zhen S. Huang ◽  
Mark P. Callery ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (10) ◽  
pp. 1143-1146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas N. Nissen ◽  
Vijay G. Menon ◽  
Vichin Puri ◽  
Alagappan Annamalai ◽  
Brendan Boland

Pancreatic fistula (PF) continues to be the Achilles’ heel of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with both morbidity and mortality linked to its occurrence. The optimal drain management strategy after PD remains unclear. We evaluated drain amylase (DA) levels on postoperative Day (POD) 0 to 5 in 76 consecutive patients undergoing PD to determine the patterns associated with PF. Of these 76 patients, eight patients (11%) developed Grade A, B, or C PF by International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula criteria. POD 1 DA levels correlated closely with PF rates when high (greater than 5000 U/L, 100% PF rate) and low (less than 100 U/L, 2% PF rate). In patients with intermediate POD 1 DA (100 to 5000 U/L), 42 and 74 per cent had low DA levels on POD 3 and 5, respectively, and the PF rate was four of 31 (13%). Overall, the temporal pattern of decreasing DA levels after PD correlates closely with the risk of PF, and only two patients (5%) developed PF after early DA levels had normalized. Based on these data, we propose an algorithm of monitoring DA daily with drain removal when the level is less than 100 U/L. In our patient group drain removal would have occurred on a mean of 1.8 days and median 1 day after surgery.


HPB ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. S100
Author(s):  
Brian P. Chen ◽  
Sean Bennett ◽  
Kimberly Bertens ◽  
Richard Mimeault ◽  
Fady K. Balaa ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Yu. S. Galchina ◽  
G. G. Kаrmаzаnovsky ◽  
D. V. Kalinin ◽  
E. V. Kondratyev ◽  
D. S. Gorin ◽  
...  

Purpose. Identification of the possibilities of contrast enhancement computed tomography in evaluated the number of the acinar structures in the pancreatic parenchyma at the preoperative stage to predict the development pancreatic fistula.Material and methods. In 2016–2019, 196 pancreatoduodenectomy were performed. 86 patients were retrospectively selected. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 included 16 observations with the development of clinically significant pancreatic fistula, in 2 – 70 cases without complications. According to preoperative contrast enhancement computed tomography, structure of the pancreas, pancreatic parenchyma thickness, pancreatic duct diameter, the density of the pancreas in the native phase, relative parenchyma enhancement ratio, washout coefficient, pancreas stump volume were evaluated. According histological, the number of acinar and fat cells in the section of the removed pancreas was evaluated.Results. “Soft” structure of the pancreas (r = 0.374, p = 0.000), pancreatic parenchyma thickness (r = 0.549, p = 0.000), the density of the pancreas in the native phase of the scan (r = 0.568, p = 0.000), the values relative parenchyma enhancement ratio (r = 0.63, p = 0.000), pancreas stump volume (r = 0.508, p = 0.000) positively correlated with clinically significant pancreatic fistula and the number of acinar cells. Pancreatic duct diameter (r = −0.339, p = 0.001) negatively correlated with clinically significant pancreatic fistula and the number of acinar cells. Pancreatic fistula risk is 3.09 times higher with the number of acini more than 72.5%, sensitivity 75%, specificity 75.71%. Pancreatic fistula risk is 1.8 times higher with the density of the pancreas in the native phase over 35.5 HU sensitivity 62%, specificity 65%. Pancreatic fistula risk is 2.76 times higher with values parenchyma accumulation coefficient more than 1, sensitivity 75%, specificity 73%.Conclusions. Contrast enhancement computed tomography allows evaluating acinar index in the preoperative period to pick out the high-risk patient group to development of pancreatic fistula.


2020 ◽  
pp. 27-33
Author(s):  
Yulia Galchina ◽  
Gleb Galkin ◽  
Grigory Karmazanovsky ◽  
David Gorin ◽  
Andrey Kriger

One of the most common complications after pancreatic resections is an external pancreatic fistula. The main risk factor for pancreatic fistula is the “soft” structure of the pancreas. The aim of the study is to determine the possibility of computed tomography with contrast enhancement at the preoperative period in an objective assessment of the structure of the pancreas with pancreatoduodenal resections and prediction of pancreatic fistula in the postoperative period. Retrospectively, 102 patients were selected. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on the structure of the pancreas according to computed tomography at the preoperative period. According to the data of preoperative CT with contrast enhancement, the structure of the pancreas was evaluated; density characteristics in native, arterial, venous, delayed phases (HU); pancreatic duct diameter. Group 1 included 37 patients with a “soft” pancreas. 65 patients with a “solid” pancreas were in group 2. In group 1, in 16 cases (43%), a clinically significant PF was formed in the postoperative period; in 21 cases (57%), the postoperative period proceeded uncomplicated. In group 2, in 5 cases (8%), the postoperative period was complicated by clinically significant PF; in 60 cases (92%), the postoperative period was uncomplicated. The development of clinically significant PF positively correlates with the “soft” pancreas (r = 0.374, p<0.001), the density of pancreas of the native phase (r = 0.179, p = 0.099), the density of pancreas in the arterial phase (r = 0.208, p =0.054). Negatively correlates with the “solid” pancreas (r = -0.274, p<0.001) and the pancreatic duct diameter (r = -0.339, p = 0.001). The “soft” pancreas positively correlates with the density pancreas in the native phase (r = 0,559, p<0,001) and the density pancreas in the arterial phase (r = 0,710, p<0,001) and negatively correlates with the pancreatic duct diameter (r = - 0,534, p<0,001) and the density pancreas in the excretory phase (r = -0,409, p<0,001). Using computed tomography with contrast enhancement at the preoperative period, an objective assessment of the pancreatic structure is possible due to its density characteristics in the native and arterial phases of the scan to highlight a high-risk group for the development of clinically significant PF.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document