P-P47 Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy

Background Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal tumours with a five-year survival rate of less than 7% for all stages. However, current evidence suggests neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) may have survival benefits in those with borderline resectable disease. Post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a potential complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and is associated with long-term morbidity. The rate of developing POPF post-PD in those receiving NAT is currently unclear. Methods Patients undergoing PD (both classical and pylorus-preserving) were identified from a prospectively collected local database. Those who received NAT prior to surgery were identified, and case-matched controls based on their age and sex, were then identified from the database. Post-operative drain amylase levels were used to compare POPF between groups. For the analysis, drain amylase levels greater than three times the upper limit of normal at day five were consistent with biochemical POPF. Results A total of 34 patients (14 females, 20 males) underwent PD after receiving NAT at our unit from January 2013 to July 2021. The median age was 66 years at the time of surgery. Two patients (5.9%) in the NAC group had biochemical leaks on day five compared to 4 (11.8%) in the case-matched control group (p = 0.7). Conclusions Our early data suggest a possibility of a lower incidence of biochemical POPF in those undergoing PD post-NAT. Aetiology on the development of POPD post-NAT is still unclear, and this requires further study and long-term follow up.

P-P45 Prognostic Value of CRP in Post-PPPD and Whipple’s Re-Intervention

Background Several studies have aimed to use different biochemical and haematological markers to predict relevant post-operatively pancreatic fistulas after hepatobiliary operations, however none has been defined as the gold-standard. This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of day 3 C-reactive protein (CRP) and drain amylase values in predicting re-intervention in patients who have undergone pancreatico-duodenectomy (PPPD) or Whipple’s procedure. Methods Retrospective collection of data from a prospective database of patients who underwent PPPD or Whipple’s procedure between January 2017 and February 2021. Serum CRP was collected from day one to day five post-operatively, and day three or the closest available result of post-surgery drain amylase values were considered. Cutoff values were determined as follows: day three CRP optimal level was determined by the median (175 mg/L), and drain amylase was determined by three times the upper limit of normal serum amylase level (330 U/L). Post-operative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) were classified as per the 2016 International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Re-intervention was defined as any deviation from the normal post-surgical care – including interventional radiology procedures, embolisation, re-look laparotomies and re-admission to Intensive Care. Results A total of 217 patients were included in this study – 182 underwent pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy as opposed to those who had Whipple procedure. 55 (25%) patients required re-intervention post-operatively. A day three CRP above 175 showed a sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 66% in predicting re-intervention in these patients. The combination of this and elevated drain amylase proved to be more sensitive (85%) and specific (87%) than the CRP alone. Conclusions Day 3 CRP and drain amylase are accurate predictors of post-PPPD and Whipple’s re-interventions. We aim to include this as part of the local Enhanced Recovery Pathway to help identify patients that will potentially develop complications requiring further surgical management.

Impact of surgical drain output monitoring on patient outcomes in hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery: A systematic review

Background and objective: Surgical drains are widely utilized in hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery to prevent intra-abdominal collections and identify postoperative complications. Surgical drain monitoring ranges from simple-output measurements to specific analysis for constituents such as amylase. This systematic review aimed to determine whether surgical drain monitoring can detect postoperative complications and impact on patient outcomes. Methods: A systematic review was performed, and the following databases searched between 02/03/20 and 26/04/20: MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov. All studies describing surgical drain monitoring of output and content in adult patients undergoing hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery were considered. Other invasive methods of intra-abdominal sampling were excluded. Results: The search returned 403 articles. Following abstract review, 390 were excluded and 13 articles were included for full review. The studies were classified according to speciality and featured 11 pancreatic surgery and 2 hepatobiliary surgery studies with a total sample of 3262 patients. Postoperative monitoring of drain amylase detected pancreatic fistula formation and drain bilirubin testing facilitated bile leak detection. Both methods enabled early drain removal. Improved patient outcomes were observed through decreased incidence of postoperative complications (pancreatic fistulas, intra-abdominal infections, and surgical-site infections), length of stay, and mortality rate. Isolated monitoring of drain output did not confer any clinical benefits. Conclusions: Surgical drain monitoring has advantages in the postoperative care for selected patients undergoing hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery. Enhanced surgical drain monitoring involving the testing of drain amylase and bilirubin improves the detection of complications in the immediate postoperative period.

783 C-REACTIVE PROTEIN VERSUS DRAIN AMYLASE; THEIR RELIABILITY IN RULING OUT ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE IVOR-LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY

One of the most feared complications of the esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is anastomotic leakage (AL). Early diagnosis is vital for timely initiation of therapeutic interventions as well as prompting early feeding in the absence of AL. The aim of this study is to investigate the role of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and drain amylase levels in the early detection of AL. Methods All 109 patients who underwent a minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis procedure in our hospital between January 2018 and October 2020 were retrospectively included in this study. Data on CRP and drain amylase levels were collected during the first 5 postoperative days (POD) and were available for analyses. Mean CRP and median drain amylase levels between patients with and without AL were compared and ROC curves on POD 3, 4 and 5 were plotted to calculate cut-off values for CRP. Results In 13 of 109 patients (12%) AL was diagnosed with a median time to diagnosis of 8 days. Mean CRP was significantly higher in patients with AL on POD 3, 4 and 5. Cut-off values of 48, 113 and 90 mg/L had a high sensitivity of 100%, 92% and 92% on POD 3, 4 and 5. No difference in median drain amylase levels was observed. Conclusion CRP levels with a cut-off point of 113 mg/L on POD 4 do not improve earlier detection of AL, but has a high sensitivity for excluding AL while the value of drain amylase in the first 5 days after surgery is limited.

Comprehensive Diagnostic Nomogram for Predicting Clinically Relevant Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy

BackgroundClinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) remains a severe and challenging complication of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This study aimed to establish a novel postoperative nomogram-based diagnostic model for the early detection of CR-POPF in patients subjected to PD.MethodsConsecutive patients who underwent PD in Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University from December 2018 to October 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors for CR-POPF. Then, a novel predictive nomogram was established accordingly.ResultsAmong the consecutive 176 patients who underwent PD, 37 (21.1%) patients developed CR-POPF. Through univariate and multivariate analyses, the drain amylase (P = 0.002), serum creatinine (P = 0.009), and serum C reactive protein (P = 0.045) at postoperative day 1 (POD1) as well as the neutrophil count (P = 0.025) and temperature (P = 0.025) at POD3 were identified as independent risk factors for CR-POPF. Based on this, a novel predictive nomogram containing these factors was constructed to predict the probability of CR-POPF after PD. The formulated nomogram showed better performance to detect CR-POPF after PD with a sensitivity of 0.784, specificity of 0.770, positive predictive value of 0.475, and negative predictive value of 0.930 when compared to other predictors. In addition, the predictive value of the nomogram was assessed by a concordance index of 0.814 (95% CI, 0.736–0.892), which was significantly higher than indicators alone. This was further validated and depicted by decision curve analysis and clinical impact curve.ConclusionThis study established a diagnostic nomogram of postoperative objective parameters that can predict the development of CR-POPF after PD with a good discriminative ability and predictive accuracy.

The value of serum amylase and drain fluid amylase to predict postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy: a retrospective cohort study

Purpose Serum and drain amylase have been identified as important predictors of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and might be useful to guide postoperative drain management after pancreatoduodenectomy. We aimed to determine and compare the value of serum amylase and drain fluid amylase to predict postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. Methods This retrospective cohort study included patients after pancreatoduodenectomy from 2012 to 2019. The primary endpoint of our study was grade B/C POPF. Serum amylase on postoperative day 1 (SA-1) and drain fluid amylase on postoperative day 2 (DFA-2) were analyzed. Results A total of 92 of 437 patients (21.1%) developed a grade B/C POPF. SA-1 was higher in patients who developed a grade B/C POPF (336 U/L vs. 97 U/L, p<0.001). Similarly, DFA-2 was higher in patients who developed a grade B/C POPF (1764 U/L vs. 78 U/L, p<0.001). SA-1 and DFA-2 had similar predictive accuracy (AUC: 0.82 vs. 0.85, respectively, p=0.329). Patients with SA-1<100 U/L (n=178) had a risk of 2.2% of developing grade B/C POPF, compared to 38.2% in patients with SA-1 >100 U/L (n=207). Patients with DFA-2<100 U/L (n=141) had a risk of 0% of developing grade B/C POPF, compared to 36.2% in patients with DFA-2>100 U/L (n=196). SA-1 and DFA-2 were strongly associated at a cut-off of 100 U/L (p<0.001, 89% concordance rate). Conclusion Postoperative serum and drain amylase values below 100 U/L both effectively rule out POPF after pancreatoduodenectomy. The advantage of serum amylase measurement is that it can be used in patients who are managed without surgical drains.