Elimination of Routine Benzodiazepine Administration for Nonprocedural Sedation in a Trauma Intensive Care Unit is Feasible

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (6) ◽  
pp. 947-951
Author(s):  
Kaitlin McGinn ◽  
S. Noelle Davis ◽  
Elizabeth Terrry ◽  
Jon Simmons ◽  
Sidney Brevard
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Current Guideline ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Light Levels ◽  
Continuous Sedation ◽  
Polytrauma Patients ◽  
Level I

Current guidelines on the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in the intensive care unit (ICU) recommend a non-benzodiazepine (BDZ)–based approach to sedation. Management of agitation can be challenging in multitrauma patients but is imperative to facilitate patient recovery. Given the current guideline recommendations, a protocol to eliminate BDZ administration and maintain light levels of sedation was adopted in our ICU. The purpose of this analysis was to demonstrate that it is feasible to safely eliminate BDZ administration in a trauma ICU. This was a single-center, retrospective, observational analysis at a Level I trauma center. Adult patients (>18 years old) admitted to the Trauma Critical Care service from March 2015 to August 2015 were included. The primary outcome recorded was the use and duration of nonprocedural BDZs which was defined as BDZ not given within one hour of a procedure or test. A total of 64 patients met the inclusion criteria. The average Injury Severity Score was 18.7. A total of 14 patients (21.9%) received BDZ for a nonprocedure-related indication. Of those patients, all (100%) received less than three as-needed doses of BDZs during their ICU stay. In mechanically ventilated patients, continuous sedation or analgesia was not continued for more than 1.3 days. Only five patients (7.8%) received continuous BDZ. Limiting sedation is feasible in critically ill polytrauma patients. Protocols to standardize sedation strategies should be implemented in the ICU to avoid unnecessary sedation.

scholarly journals The assessment of clinical evaluation and treatment results of high-energy blunt polytrauma patients

Medicina ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Algimantas Pamerneckas ◽  
Andrei Pijadin ◽  
Giedrius Pilipavičius ◽  
Gintaras Tamulaitis ◽  
Vytautas Toliušis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Motor Vehicle ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Ventilation Time ◽  
Polytrauma Patients ◽  
The Mean

The aim of this study was to evaluate the mechanism of high-energy blunt trauma, age and gender of patients, severity of regional and multiple injury, ventilation time, length of stay in intensive care unit and in-hospital stay, in-hospital complications, and treatment outcome. Materials and methods. Data on 159 patients with severe multiple injuries, meeting inclusion criteria, were collected prospectively and evaluated retrospectively. Results. The mean age of multiple trauma patients was 43.9±1.4 years; males were injured 2.5 times more often than females (P<0.001). More than half (66.7%) of patients were 17–64-year-old males. Majority (83%) of all patients were injured in motor vehicle crashes, and 52.2% of these patients were pedestrians. The mean Injury Severity Score was 29.5±0.8, and severe (Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 3 and more) injuries of extremities, head, and chest made up 69.1% of all injuries. The mean ventilation time, mean length of stay in intensive care unit, and mean in-hospital stay were 5.5±0.7, 7.0±0.8, and 23.6±1.6 days, respectively. Acute lung complications were the most common (25.2%). Systemic inflammatory response syndrome developed in 7.5% of patients, and sepsis in 3.8% of patients. More than one-fifth (20.8%) of polytrauma patients died. Conclusions. Working-age male pedestrians (17–64 years old) made up two-thirds of all polytrauma patients. Severe injuries of extremities, head, and chest were present in 69.1% of all cases. Lung complications were the most common.

How to Further Decrease the Efficiency of Care at a Level I Trauma Center: Implement the Amended Resident Work Hours

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (7) ◽  
pp. 698-703
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Schroeppel ◽  
John P. Sharpe ◽  
Louis J. Magnotti ◽  
Jordan A. Weinberg ◽  
Martin A. Croce ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Unit Length ◽  
Work Hours ◽  
Resident Work ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Work Hour ◽  
Level I ◽  
Post Period

Work-hour restrictions were amended in 2011 to limit interns to 16 continuous duty hours, essentially requiring a night float system of 12-hour shifts. We hypothesize that there has been no improvement in outcomes after implementation of the amended work-hour restrictions. Outcomes from trauma admissions were queried from the trauma registry from 2009 to 2011 (PRE) and 2011 to 2013 (POST). The primary outcome was mortality with secondary outcomes intensive care unit length of stay (LOS) and LOS. Patients were stratified based on age, mechanism, gender, blood pressure, heart rate, and injury severity (Injury Severity Score, Glasgow Coma Scale, Base Deficit). Outcomes were then compared from admissions PRE to POST. A total of 9178 patients were included in the study population. The mean age was 42 with most being male (72%) and blunt mechanism (81%). Patient populations were well matched except patients in the POST period were slightly older (43 vs 42 years; P = 0.01). Intensive care unit LOS and LOS were higher in the POST period. After adjusted analysis, admission in the POST period was not a predictor of mortality (odds ratio 0.857; confidence interval 0.655–1.12). The POST period was an independent predictor for LOS (β = 0.74; P = 0.002). This study adds to the mounting evidence that the implementation of the amended limits on work hours leads to furthermore decreased efficiency of care.

Five-Year Outcomes After Implementing a Pain, Agitation, and Delirium Protocol in a Mixed Intensive Care Unit

2021 ◽  
pp. 088506662110634
Author(s):  
Jeffrey T. Fish ◽  
Jared T. Baxa ◽  
Ryan R. Draheim ◽  
Matthew J. Willenborg ◽  
Jared C. Mills ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Admission Diagnosis ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Standardized Mortality Ratio ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Mortality Ratio ◽  
Apache Iv

Objective: Assess for continued improvements in patient outcomes after updating our institutional sedation and analgesia protocol to include recommendations from the 2013 Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) Pain, Agitation, and Delirium (PAD) guidelines. Methods: Retrospective before-and-after study in a mixed medical/surgical intensive care unit (ICU) at an academic medical center. Mechanically ventilated adults admitted from September 1, 2011 through August 31, 2012 (pre-implementation) and October 1, 2012 through September 30, 2017 (post-implementation) were included. Measurements included number of mechanically ventilated patients, APACHE IV scores, age, type of patient (medical or surgical), admission diagnosis, ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, ventilator days, number of self-extubations, ICU mortality, ICU standardized mortality ratio, hospital mortality, hospital standardized mortality ratio, medication data including as needed (PRN) analgesic and sedative use, and analgesic and sedative infusions, and institutional savings. Results: Ventilator days (Pre-PAD = 4.0 vs. Year 5 post = 3.2, P < .0001), ICU LOS (Pre-PAD = 4.8 days vs. Year 5 post = 4.1 days, P = .0004) and hospital LOS (Pre-PAD = 14 days vs. Year 5 post = 12 days, P < .0001) decreased after protocol implementation. Hospital standardized mortality ratio (Pre-PAD = 0.69 vs. Year 5 post = 0.66) remained constant; while, APACHE IV scores (Pre-PAD = 77 vs. Year 5 post = 89, P < .0001) and number of intubated patients (Pre-PAD = 1146 vs. Year 5 post = 1468) increased over the study period. Using the decreased ICU and hospital LOS estimates, it is projected the institution saved $4.3 million over the 5 years since implementation. Conclusions: Implementation of an updated PAD protocol in a mixed medical/surgical ICU was associated with a significant decrease in ventilator time, ICU LOS, and hospital LOS without a change in the standardized mortality ratio over a five-year period. These favorable outcomes are associated with a significant cost savings for the institution.

scholarly journals The ethical concerns of seeking consent from critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients for research – A matter of possessing capacity or surrogate insight

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 107-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avelino C Verceles ◽  
Waqas Bhatti
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Informed Consent ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated Patients ◽  
Ethical Concerns ◽  
Multiple Factors ◽  
Ventilated Patients

Conducting clinical research on subjects admitted to intensive care units is challenging, as they frequently lack the capacity to provide informed consent due to multiple factors including intensive care unit acquired delirium, coma, the need for sedation, or underlying critical illness. However, the presence of one or more of these characteristics does not automatically designate a potential subject as lacking capacity to provide their own informed consent. We review the ethical issues involved in obtaining informed consent for medical research from mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients, in addition to the concerns that may arise when a legally authorized representative is asked to provide informed consent on behalf of these patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document