REBOA Use, Practices, Characteristics, and Implementations Across Various US Trauma Centers

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482098881
Author(s):  
Mason Sutherland ◽  
Aaron Shepherd ◽  
Kyle Kinslow ◽  
Mark McKenney ◽  
Adel Elkbuli
Keyword(s):  
Online Survey ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Balloon Occlusion ◽  
Common Mechanism ◽  
Pelvic Hemorrhage ◽  
Frequency Of Use ◽  
Trauma Surgeons ◽  
Trauma Bay ◽  
Current Guidelines ◽  
Endovascular Balloon Occlusion

Background Hemorrhage accounts for >30% of trauma-related mortalities. Use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for temporary hemostasis in the civilian population remains controversial. We aim to investigate REBOA practices through analysis of surgeon and trauma center characteristics, implementation, patient characteristics, and overall opinions. Methods An anonymous 30-question standardized online survey on REBOA use was administered to active trauma surgeon members of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Results A total of 345 responses were received, and 130/345 (37.7%) reported REBOA being favorable, 42 (12.2%) reported REBOA unfavorably, and 173 (50.1%) were undecided. The majority of respondents (87.6%) reported REBOA performance in the trauma bay. 170 (49.3%) of respondents reported having deployed REBOA at least once over the past 2 years. 80.0% reported blunt trauma being the most common mechanism of injury in REBOA patients. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta deployment in zone 3 of the aorta was significantly higher in patients reported to suffer a pelvic fracture or pelvic hemorrhage, whereas REBOA deployment in zone 1 was significantly higher among patients reported to suffer hepatic, splenic, or other intra-abdominal hemorrhage ( P < .05). Conclusion Among survey respondents, frequency of REBOA use was low along with knowledge of clear indications for use. While current REBOA usage among respondents appeared to model current guidelines, additional research regarding REBOA indications, ideal patient populations, and outcomes is needed in order to improve REBOA perception in trauma surgeons and increase frequency of use.

scholarly journals Implementation of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta at the Korean Regional Trauma Center

2019 ◽  
pp. 102490791986656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youngeun Park ◽  
Byungchul Yu ◽  
Giljae Lee ◽  
Jungnam Lee ◽  
Kangkook Choi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Implementation Process ◽  
Balloon Occlusion ◽  
Brief Training ◽  
Training Courses ◽  
Trauma Surgeons ◽  
Trauma Bay ◽  
Endovascular Balloon Occlusion

Background: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta is used as adjunctive management for a profound shock in some trauma centers. We report our early experience of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta to describe the implementation and possible indications of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta. Objective: This study was designed to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta based on our experience and share our implementation process by trauma surgeons in Korea. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of consecutive cases of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in profound shock due to noncompressible torso hemorrhage at a single Korean trauma center. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta was introduced and implemented with written protocol and endovascular training courses. Results: All cases ( n = 24) were done for blunt mechanisms. Twelve cases (50%) were resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in zone I, three cases (12.5%) were zone II, and nine cases (45%) in zone III. Mean pre-occlusion systolic blood pressure was 47 mm Hg and mean systolic blood pressure increase was 41.3 mm Hg. Twenty-one patients (87.5%) survived at trauma bay and seven patients (29.2%) survived and discharged without neurologic deficit. There were two complications directly related to the procedure. Conclusion: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta is a useful adjunctive skill for trauma surgeons, and a brief training course can help in the implementation of the procedure.

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) enables operative management of the peripartum trauma patient in hemorrhagic shock

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelvin Allenson ◽  
Laura Moore
Keyword(s):  
Maternal Death ◽  
Motor Vehicle ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Balloon Occlusion ◽  
Motor Vehicle Accidents ◽  
Gravid Uterus ◽  
Intrauterine Pregnancy ◽  
Vehicle Accidents ◽  
Pelvic Hemorrhage ◽  
Endovascular Balloon Occlusion

Trauma related injury is the leading cause of non-obstetric maternal death.  The gravid uterus is at risk for injury, particularly during motor vehicle accidents.  Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a means of controlling pelvic hemorrhage in the setting of trauma.  We report the use of REBOA in a hemodynamically unstable, multiply-injured young woman with viable intrauterine pregnancy.

New Techniques in Hemorrhage Control

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan Brenner ◽  
Joseph DuBose
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Algorithm ◽  
Balloon Occlusion ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Stent Grafting ◽  
Pelvic Hemorrhage ◽  
Key Words Angiography ◽  
Vessel Injury ◽  
Definitive Therapy ◽  
Endovascular Balloon Occlusion

The use of interventional procedures in trauma has increased steadily over the past 10 years. With advancements in both imaging and device technology, endovascular techniques have become part of the treatment algorithm for both large and small vessel injury. Endovascular therapy in trauma involves a minimally invasive, catheter-based approach, which can be used as a temporizing measure in patients in extremis or as definitive therapy in a wide variety of diagnoses. Sheaths, catheters, and guide wires are universal instruments, regardless of procedure. Devices passed over guide wires form the basis of diagnosis and treatment. Using this technology provides many advantages to traditional open surgical therapy, namely the avoidance of large and potentially morbid incisions. Angioembolization, stent grafting, and resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) are being used with increasing frequency in trauma centers, with established algorithms, multiinstitutional trials, and more published data available, particularly for solid-organ and pelvic hemorrhage. Key words: angiography, embolization, hemorrhage, resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta, stent graft

New Techniques in Hemorrhage Control

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan Brenner ◽  
Joseph DuBose
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Algorithm ◽  
Balloon Occlusion ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Stent Grafting ◽  
Pelvic Hemorrhage ◽  
Key Words Angiography ◽  
Vessel Injury ◽  
Definitive Therapy ◽  
Endovascular Balloon Occlusion

The use of interventional procedures in trauma has increased steadily over the past 10 years. With advancements in both imaging and device technology, endovascular techniques have become part of the treatment algorithm for both large and small vessel injury. Endovascular therapy in trauma involves a minimally invasive, catheter-based approach, which can be used as a temporizing measure in patients in extremis or as definitive therapy in a wide variety of diagnoses. Sheaths, catheters, and guide wires are universal instruments, regardless of procedure. Devices passed over guide wires form the basis of diagnosis and treatment. Using this technology provides many advantages to traditional open surgical therapy, namely the avoidance of large and potentially morbid incisions. Angioembolization, stent grafting, and resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) are being used with increasing frequency in trauma centers, with established algorithms, multiinstitutional trials, and more published data available, particularly for solid-organ and pelvic hemorrhage. Key words: angiography, embolization, hemorrhage, resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta, stent graft

Successful Control of Massive Vaginal Bleeding with Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta and Pelvic Packing

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emre Özlüer ◽  
Çagaç Yetis ◽  
Evrim Sayin ◽  
Mücahit Avcil
Keyword(s):  
Vaginal Bleeding ◽  
Balloon Occlusion ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Pelvic Packing ◽  
Gynecological Malignancies ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Successful Control ◽  
Endovascular Balloon Occlusion

Gynecological malignancies may present as life-threatening vaginal bleeding. Pelvic packing and Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) may be useful along with conventional vaginal packing when in terms of control of the hemorrhage. Emergency physicians should be able to perform these interventions promptly in order to save their patients from exsanguination.

AORTA Registry 7F vs 11-12 F access

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Reviewer Joseph DuBose ◽  
Jonathan Morrison ◽  
Megan Brenner ◽  
Laura Moore ◽  
John B Holcomb ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ultrasound Guidance ◽  
Balloon Occlusion ◽  
Aortic Occlusion ◽  
Severely Injured ◽  
Distal Extremity ◽  
Low Profile ◽  
Transfusion Requirements ◽  
Thrombotic Complications ◽  
Device Use ◽  
Endovascular Balloon Occlusion

ABSTRACT Introduction:  The introduction of low profile devices designed for Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) after trauma has the potential to change practice, outcomes and complication profiles related to this procedure. Methods: The AAST Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery (AORTA) registry was utilized to identify REBOA patients from 16 centers -comparing presentation, intervention and outcome variables for those REBOA via traditional 11-12 access platforms and trauma-specific devices requiring only 7 F access. Results:From Nov 2013-Dec 2017, 242 patients with completed data were identified, constituting 124 7F and 118 11-12F uses. Demographics of presentation were not different between the two groups, except that the 7F patients had a higher mean ISS (39.2 34.1, p = 0.028). 7F device use was associated with a lower cut-down requirement for access (22.6% vs. 37.3%, p = 0.049) and increased ultrasound guidance utilization (29.0% 23.7%, p = 0.049). 7F device afforded earlier aortic occlusion in the course of resuscitation (median 25.0 mins vs. 30 mins, p = 0.010), and had lower median PRBC (10.0 vs. 15.5 units, p = 0.006) and FFP requirements (7.5 vs. 14.0 units, p = 0.005). 7F patients were more likely to survive 24 hrs (58.1% vs. 42.4%, p = 0.015) and less likely to suffer in-hospital mortality (57.3% vs. 75.4%, p = 0.003). Finally, 7F device use was associated with a 4X lower rate of distal extremity embolism (20.0% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.014;OR 95% CI 4.25 [1.25-14.45]) compared to 11-12F counterparts. Conclusion: The introduction of trauma specific 7F REBOA devices appears to have influenced REBOA practices, with earlier utilization in severely injured hypotensive patients via less invasive means that are associated with lower transfusion requirements fewer thrombotic complications and improved survival. Additional study is required to determine optimal REBOA utilization.

Use of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) as a bridge to endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in blunt abdominal aortic injury (BAAI).

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentina Chiarini
Keyword(s):  
Trauma Center ◽  
Aortic Rupture ◽  
Damage Control ◽  
Aortic Injury ◽  
Balloon Occlusion ◽  
Traumatic Lesion ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Aortic Injuries ◽  
Accepted Practice ◽  
Endovascular Balloon Occlusion

BAAI is a rare but challenging traumatic lesion. Since BAAI is difficult to suspect and diagnose, frequently lethal and associated to multiorgan injuries, its management is objective of research and discussion. REBOA is an accepted practice in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Conversely, blunt aortic injuries are the currently most cited contraindications for the use of REBOA in trauma, together with thoracic lesions. We reported a case of BAAI safely managed in our Trauma Center at Maggiore Hospital in Bologna (Italy) utilizing REBOA as a bridge to endovascular repair, since there were no imminent indications for laparotomy. Despite formal contraindication to placing REBOA in aortic rupture, we hypothesized that this approach could be feasible and relatively safe when introduced in a resuscitative damage control protocol.

Use of ER-REBOA to Reverse Traumatic Arrest After Non-Truncal Bleeding

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Chance Spalding ◽  
Matthew L Moorman ◽  
John B Holcomb
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Balloon Occlusion ◽  
Successful Case ◽  
Endovascular Balloon Occlusion

We report a successful case of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) to control hemorrhage in a patient with cardiac arrest secondary to non-truncal hemorrhage.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document