Myringoplasty

1980 ◽  
Vol 89 (4) ◽  
pp. 331-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
James L. Sheehy ◽  
Robert G. Anderson

We reviewed the records of 472 patients who had undergone myringoplasty during an 11-year period at the Otologic Medical Group. There was a statistically significant relationship between the size of the perforation and the degree of hearing impairment, but no relationship between the degree of impairment and the complaint of tinnitus. The majority of operations were performed using the lateral surface fascia grafting technique. Those 168 operations performed postauricularly were successful in closing the tympanic membrane perforation in over 97% of the cases and in reducing the conductive deficit to 10 dB or less in 88%. There were no total sensorineural impairments, although 3 % of the patients developed a high tone sensorineural impairment. Blunting in the anterior sulcus and lateral healing of the graft were very uncommon. Canal skin was used as a graft in 16% of the patients. The graft take results and hearing results were less favorable than with fascia.

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 297-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sundar Dhungana ◽  
Pabina Rayamajhi ◽  
Rakesh Prakash Shrivastav

Background: Myringoplasty done for anterior and subtotal perforation needs expertise and practice than conventional underlay myringoplasty. The objective of this study was to compare the graft uptake and postoperative hearing results between ‘U’ flap and conventional tympanomeatal flap technique in anterior and subtotal tympanic membrane perforation.Methods: Sixty three patients of age fifteen years and above with chronic otitis media mucosal type with any sizedanterior and subtotal perforationof tympanic membrane were randomly allocated for myringoplasty by lottery method. There were thirty one cases in ‘U’ flap group and thirty twocases in conventional tympanomeatal flap group. Graft uptake and hearing results were assessed after six weeks and results were compared within and between the groups.Results: Graft uptake rate was 90.3%(28/31) in‘U’ flap group and it was 87.5%(28/32) in conventional tympanomeatal flap group with no statistically significant difference (p= 0.772) between the two groups. The mean pre and post-operative air bone gap in ‘U’ flap group were 23.63dB±7.77dB; 13.26dB±5.50dB and that in the conventional tympanomeatal flap group were 20.88±9.88dB, 9.42dB±6.70dB respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in hearing results between the two groups (p= 0.504).Conclusions: The graft uptake rate and hearing results of ‘U’ flap group were comparable and showed no statistically significant difference to those of conventional tympanomeatal flap group.


2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 297-301
Author(s):  
Sundar Dhungana ◽  
Pabina Rayamajhi ◽  
Rakesh Prakash Shrivastav

Background: Myringoplasty done for anterior and subtotal perforation needs expertise and practice than conventional underlay myringoplasty. The objective of this study was to compare the graft uptake and postoperative hearing results between ‘U’ flap and conventional tympanomeatal flap technique in anterior and subtotal tympanic membrane perforation.Methods: Sixty three patients of age fifteen years and above with chronic otitis media mucosal type with any sized anterior and subtotal perforation of tympanic membrane were randomly allocated for myringoplasty by lottery method. There were thirty one cases in ‘U’ flap group and thirty two cases in conventional tympanomeatal flap group. Graft uptake and hearing results were assessed after six weeks and results were compared within and between the groups.Results: Graft uptake rate was 90.3%(28/31) in‘U’ flap group and it was 87.5%(28/32) in conventional tympanomeatal flap group with no statistically significant difference (p= 0.772) between the two groups. The mean pre and post-operative air bone gap in ‘U’ flap group were 23.63dB±7.77dB; 13.26dB±5.50dB and that in the conventional tympanomeatal flap group were 20.88±9.88dB, 9.42dB±6.70dB respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in hearing results between the two groups (p= 0.504).Conclusions: The graft uptake rate and hearing results of ‘U’ flap group were comparable and showed no statistically significant difference to those of conventional tympanomeatal flap group. Keywords: Anterior perforation; myringoplasty; subtotal perforation; ‘U’ flap.


2019 ◽  
Vol 384 ◽  
pp. 107813 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lingling Cai ◽  
Glenna Stomackin ◽  
Nicholas M. Perez ◽  
Xiaohui Lin ◽  
Timothy T. Jung ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soo Hyeon Kim ◽  
Ju Yeon Jeong ◽  
Hyun Jung Park ◽  
Bo Mi Moon ◽  
Ye Ri Park ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document