Differences Between the Miller Analogies Test Scores of People Tested Twice

1971 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 735-744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerome E. Doppelt
Keyword(s):  
Test Scores ◽  
Miller Analogies Test

Changes in Ability of Graduate Students in Education to Assess Own Test Performance as Related to Their Miller Analogies Scores

1974 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Earl W. Kooker
Keyword(s):  
Graduate Students ◽  
Test Performance ◽  
Test Scores ◽  
Miller Analogies Test

105 graduate students in education, classified into three levels of Miller Analogies Test scores, were asked to estimate their performances on three major tests on statistics. The accuracy of evaluations did not change over the three tests though it was related to their level on the Miller Analogies.

Miller Analogies Test scores and ratings of PhD's in psychology.

1953 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon V. Watters ◽  
Donald G. Paterson
Keyword(s):  
Test Scores ◽  
Miller Analogies Test

Variability in Mat Results within the Field of Education

1979 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 665-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth E. Murray
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Secondary Education ◽  
Instructional Technology ◽  
Elementary Education ◽  
Analysis Of Variance ◽  
Educational Administration ◽  
Educational Psychology ◽  
Test Scores ◽  
Local Norms ◽  
Miller Analogies Test

This study compared Miller Analogies Test scores for 100 applicants in each of 6 different disciplines within a typical education division ( N = 600). In descending order of mean scores, they included educational psychology, instructional technology, secondary education, educational administration, special education, and elementary education. One-way analysis of variance was computed. Significant differences involved two clusters of means, the first three areas and the last three. Since variability was noted among areas, more specialized and local norms might be useful.

Biracial Testing: The Question of Clinicians' Influence on Children’s Test Performance

1977 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Ratusnik ◽  
Roy A. Koenigsknecht
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Setting ◽  
Test Performance ◽  
Test Scores ◽  
Preschool Age ◽  
Speech And Language ◽  
Black And White ◽  
Drawing Test ◽  
Lower Socioeconomic ◽  
Preschool Age Children

Six speech and language clinicians, three black and three white, administered the Goodenough Drawing Test (1926) to 144 preschoolers. The four groups, lower socioeconomic black and white and middle socioeconomic black and white, were divided equally by sex. The biracial clinical setting was shown to influence test scores in black preschool-age children.

What Do We Want Them To Be When They Grow Up?

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-31
Author(s):  
Lyn Robertson
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Social Development ◽  
Young Women ◽  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Test Scores ◽  
Spoken Language ◽  
Language Therapy ◽  
Profound Hearing Loss ◽  
Children With Hearing Loss ◽  
Learning To Listen

Abstract Learning to listen and speak are well-established preludes for reading, writing, and succeeding in mainstream educational settings. Intangibles beyond the ubiquitous test scores that typically serve as markers for progress in children with hearing loss are embedded in descriptions of the educational and social development of four young women. All were diagnosed with severe-to-profound or profound hearing loss as toddlers, and all were fitted with hearing aids and given listening and spoken language therapy. Compiling stories across the life span provides insights into what we can be doing in the lives of young children with hearing loss.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document