The Comparative Predictive Validities of High School Rank, the Ammons Quick Test, and Two Scholastic Aptitude Test Measures for a Sample of Black Female College Students

1983 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 1123-1126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence N. Houston
1968 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leon H. Belcher ◽  
Joel T. Campbell

Two word-association lists of 50 words were each administered to 50 Negro college students. 41 words were taken from the Kent-Rosanoff list, 29 from the Palermo-Jenkins list, and 30 were words used in analogy items of the Scholastic Aptitude Test. Comparisons with previous normative studies showed generally similar results. The present study did result in slightly smaller proportions of matching from class primary responses to noun, pronoun, and adverb stimulus words and of opposite responses to “opposite-evoking stimuli.” A number of the responses indicated reading difficulty or misunderstanding of the word.


1977 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 759-762 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph C. Pentecoste ◽  
William F. Lowe

Three forms of the QT (1, 2, and 3) were administered to a randomly selected sample of 42 black entering freshmen at a Midwestern university. Scholastic Aptitude Test scores and high school rank were also used as predictor variables for grade point average. The results indicated that the Quick Test provides a better prediction of first semester college grades than either high school rank or the aptitude test scores.


1978 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 168-180
Author(s):  
James S. Braswell

From time to time I have been asked to speak to groups of high school mathematics teachers about the mathematical portion of the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT). This article affords an opportunity to provide current information about this test to a greater audience of mathematics teachers and others interested in mathematics education.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document