Speech-Sound Discrimination Ability on Linguistically Unbiased Tests

1976 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 195-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane N. Bryen

Traditional testing practices have been considered by some educators as discriminatory against minority groups. These practices are thought to have led to a disproportionate number of black and Spanish speaking children being placed in special classes as a result of their “poor performance” on tests standardized on white, middle class populations and/or in standard English. In response to this problem, one particular language ability, speech-sound discrimination, was assessed using a bilingual perspective rather than one stressing the rightness of standard English. Three parallel forms of speech-sound discrimination (standard English, black English and Spanish) were each administered to a sample of lower socio-economic white, black and Puerto Rican children. The results indicated that each language group did best on the discrimination form that most closely approximated the phonological structure of its language. Also, there were no significant differences in speech-sound discrimination ability among the three groups when performances across all language forms were considered. Educational implications for assessment were discussed.

1989 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 499-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas G. Bountress ◽  
Joseph C. Sever ◽  
Joyce T. Williams

Tests of speech-sound discrimination are used by special educators, reading specialists and speech-language pathologists in assessing children's ability to differentiate between speech sounds occurring in standard English. Such tests are important in determining if speech-sound articulation errors are caused by difficulty in making such differentiations. However, during the past 10 years, these tests have been criticized on the basis of their reliability and validity. The purpose of this study was to examine the use of two alternative methods of assessing speech-sound discrimination with a school-aged population to determine if they elicited responses in a similar manner.


1976 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 279-283
Author(s):  
Shigetada Suzuki ◽  
Masako Notoya ◽  
Miyako Kanasaku ◽  
Suzuko Takeshima ◽  
Tameo Miyazaki

1977 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 260-264
Author(s):  
Masako Notoya ◽  
Shigetada Suzuki ◽  
Miyako Kanasaku ◽  
Mikiko Nakajima ◽  
Tameo Miyazaki ◽  
...  

1981 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 591-593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew S. Kerr ◽  
Clement P. Meunier

A 40-item speech sound discrimination test was administered to 158 children to assess the effects of socioeconomic level and administrative mode, oral or tape, on auditory discrimination ability. Results indicated a model of administration effect, age effect, and an interaction between age and socioeconomic level. Individual oral administration produced substantially fewer errors than a standardized tape. Low socioeconomic-level children made significantly fewer error scores as age increased, while mid-socioeconomic status children did not. All results were consistent across oral and tape administration.


1974 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 417-425
Author(s):  
Stuart I. Ritterman ◽  
Nancy C. Freeman

Thirty-two college students were required to learn the relevant dimension in each of two randomized lists of auditorily presented stimuli. The stimuli consisted of seven pairs of CV nonsense syllables differing by two relevant dimension units and from zero to seven irrelevant dimension units. Stimulus dimensions were determined according to Saporta’s units of difference. No significant differences in performance as a function of number of the irrelevant dimensions nor characteristics of the relevant dimension were observed.


1969 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 745-747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald Goldman ◽  
Macalyne Fristoe

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document