Opportunity to Learn What Is on the Test and Performance on the Test

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 76-84
Author(s):  
Stephen N. Elliott ◽  
Alexander Kurz ◽  
Nedim Yel
Keyword(s):  
General Education ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Opportunity To Learn ◽  
General Education Teachers ◽  
Content Standards ◽  
State Accountability ◽  
Mathematics Test ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Based Instruction ◽  
Students With A Disability

State accountability systems assume standards based instruction and test content are highly aligned and opportunities to learn the content exist equally for all students. This alignment between content taught and tested is important to understand achievement, yet it is rarely examined. Teachers from Grades 3 to 8 participated along with students without disabilities ( n = 116) and students with a disability (n =104) who received all mathematics instruction in their general education. Teachers recorded over 155 days of instructional information for mathematics and administered an interim mathematics test at the end of the year. We found an average of 44% of mathematics content standards were taught and tested, while 22% were not taught but tested. The results indicated students without disabilities did significantly better than students with disabilities on content taught and tested, but not so on content not taught but tested. Limitations and research needed conclude the article.

Using Standards-Based Instruction To Teach Language to Children Who Use AAC

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 92-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Solana Henneberry ◽  
Jennifer Kelso ◽  
Gloria Soto
Keyword(s):  
General Education ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Common Core ◽  
State Standards ◽  
Content Standards ◽  
Education Curriculum ◽  
General Education Curriculum ◽  
Core Content ◽  
Language Needs ◽  
Based Instruction

Abstract Federal legislation has increasingly mandated that students with disabilities have access to the general education curriculum. The general education curriculum should be the primary content and context of the education and therapeutic intervention for students who use AAC. Special educators, including speech and language pathologists, need to encapsulate the essence of Common Core Content Standards and the general education curriculum to address the content and language needs of AAC users. The interconnection of curriculum content and language demands for the AAC user can be accomplished using readily available research based tools and strategies. We created a five-step process to help SLPs incorporate the general education curriculum into intervention to address language goals of AAC users: 1) assessment; 2) identifying grade level content standards from Common Core or state standards; 3) identifying the “essence” of the standard as it relates to language; 4) generating IEP goals; and 5) teaching language skills across curricular activities. We will provide examples of this process to address a general education standard and the language and curricular content goals for beginning communicators, context-dependent communicators and for students communicating independently. Collaboration between the SLP and educators by means of these steps supports student success across all curricular areas.

Instructional Practices to Boost Tier 1 Content Area Instruction for Students with Disabilities: A Closer Look at PACT

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Swanson ◽  
Alexis Boucher
Keyword(s):  
General Education ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Instructional Practices ◽  
Content Knowledge ◽  
Content Area ◽  
Students With Learning Disabilities ◽  
Reading Support ◽  
Eighth Grade Students ◽  
Content Area Instruction ◽  
Based Instruction

For students with learning disabilities, providing text-based instruction in general education content area classes can provide students with additional reading support while simultaneously boosting their content knowledge. This article will outline a set of instructional practices delivered in social studies classes that has been shown to improve performance of eighth grade students with disabilities on measures of content knowledge, vocabulary, and content reading comprehension. Each instructional practice will be described in detail with a timeline of step-by-step procedures and accompanying language that demonstrates how the intervention may unfold in the classroom setting.

Teacher Perceptions of Mainstreaming/Inclusion, 1958–1995: A Research Synthesis

1996 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Scruggs ◽  
Margo A. Mastropieri
Keyword(s):  
General Education ◽  
Teacher Perceptions ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Item Type ◽  
Geographical Location ◽  
Skills Training ◽  
Research Synthesis ◽  
General Education Teachers ◽  
Policy And Practice ◽  
General Classroom

Twenty-eight investigations were identified in which general education teachers were surveyed regarding their perceptions of including students with disabilities in their classes. Research synthesis procedures were employed to summarize responses and examine the consistency of responses across time, geographical location, and item type. Overall, we found that about two thirds of general classroom teachers supported the concept of mainstreaming/inclusion. A smaller majority were willing to include students with disabilities in their own classes, but responses appeared to vary according to disabling condition and implicit obligations on the teacher. Although about half or more of the teachers felt that mainstreaming/inclusion could provide some benefits, only one third or less of teachers believed they had sufficient time, skills, training or resources necessary for mainstreaming/inclusion. Reported attitudes did not appear to covary with either geographical region or time of publication. Implications for policy and practice are provided.

Teacher Quality Gaps by Disability and Socioeconomic Status: Evidence From Los Angeles

2020 ◽  
pp. 0013189X2095517
Author(s):  
Ijun Lai ◽  
W. Jesse Wood ◽  
Scott A. Imberman ◽  
Nathan D. Jones ◽  
Katharine O. Strunk
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
General Education ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Teacher Quality ◽  
Empirical Work ◽  
Value Added ◽  
General Education Teachers ◽  
School Level ◽  
Quality Teachers ◽  
Evaluation Scores

Although most students with disabilities (SWDs) receive instruction from general education teachers, little empirical work has investigated whether these students have suitable access to high-quality teachers. We explore the differences in teacher quality experienced by SWDs and students without disabilities (non-SWDs) in the Los Angeles Unified School District, examining how access varies within schools as well as across school-level disadvantage rates. We leverage several different indicators of teacher effectiveness for general education teachers who instruct both SWDs and non-SWDs. We find that SWDs are significantly more likely to have teachers with lower math value-added (–0.024 standard deviations) than their non-SWD peers, and we find emerging gaps in teacher evaluation scores and exposure to novice teachers. In general, these gaps do not vary by school-level disadvantage.

Preparing General Education Pre-Service Teachers for Inclusion: Web-Enhanced Case-Based Instruction

2002 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 27-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lanna Andrews
Keyword(s):  
General Education ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Limited English Proficient ◽  
Lesson Plan ◽  
Learning Groups ◽  
Teaching Case ◽  
Lesson Analysis ◽  
On Line ◽  
Based Instruction ◽  
Limited English Proficient Students

This study investigated the use of Web-enhanced instruction and an inclusion teaching case to teach pre-service teachers to adapt instruction for included limited English proficient students with disabilities. Forty participants, in 10 cooperative learning groups, analyzed the teaching case and developed an adapted lesson plan for the teacher in the case to use with the whole class and the students with disabilities. The collaborating teacher provided feedback regarding the adapted lessons online using WebCT. The participants redid the lesson after feedback. Adapted lessons were analyzed using the Adapted Lesson Analysis Guide. The analysis revealed that intense, elaborated adaptations were developed as a result of the feedback. The participants also completed the Case On-Line Project Survey and a written reflection regarding their perceptions of the project and its outcomes.

Attitudes and Attributes of General Education Teachers Identified as Effective Inclusionists

1997 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myrna R. Olson ◽  
Lynne Chalmers ◽  
John H. Hoover
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Preparation ◽  
General Education ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Special Education Teachers ◽  
Special Educators ◽  
School Principals ◽  
General Education Teachers ◽  
Administrative Practices ◽  
Insufficient Time ◽  
Interpersonal Warmth

School principals and special education teachers identified general education teachers who were the most skilled at including students with disabilities in their classrooms. After 10 individuals identified by both principals and special educators were interviewed, seven themes emerged. These teachers (a) described their own personalities as tolerant, reflective, and flexible; (b) accepted responsibility for all students; (c) described a positive working relationship with special educators; (d) reported adjusting expectations for integrated students; (e) indicated that their primary inclusionary attitude was showing interpersonal warmth and acceptance in their interactions with students; (f) felt that there was insufficient time available for collaboration; and (g) expressed reservations about fully including all students. Results are discussed in terms of teacher preparation, administrative practices, implications for increased inclusion, and suggestions for further research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document