Lasso Regularization for Selection of Log-linear Models: An Application to Educational Assortative Mating

2019 ◽  
pp. 004912411982615
Author(s):  
Mauricio Bucca ◽  
Daniela R. Urbina
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan B. Andrade ◽  
Jens-Peter Thomsen

This article presents a new way of analysing educational assortative mating patterns, using a detailed ‘micro‐educational’ classification capturing both hierarchical and horizontal forms of educational differentiation. Taking advantage of rich Danish population data, we apply log‐linear models that include four ways of measuring educational homogamy patterns: (a) by returns to education, (b) by macro‐education (five aggregated levels), (c) by field of study (16 categories), and (d) by a disaggregated micro‐educational classification, combining levels and fields of study (54 groups). Our results show declines in educational homogamy from 1984 to 2013, but the odds ratios of being educationally homogamous at the university college and university levels remain of substantial magnitude, by both the macro‐ and micro‐educational measures. The micro‐educational classification outperforms all other measures in explaining the associations in the homogamy tables. The income measure (‘returns to education’) does a particularly poor job of explaining homogamy patterns from 1984 to 2013.


2001 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Von Eye ◽  
Christof Schuster ◽  
Kurt Kreppner

Biometrics ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline K. Benedetti ◽  
Morton B. Brown

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eli Nomes ◽  
Jan Van Bavel

One of the key social trends of the 20th century has been the expansion of participation in education. Using detailed retrospective information from the 1981 and 2001 censuses, this paper investigates how this expansion is associated with major trends in nuptiality in Belgium. We focus specifically on the changing gender balance in education and how this is related to the likelihood and timing of marriage and to patterns of educational assortative mating. Our empirical analysis shows that marriage was getting more universal, happening at an earlier age and more often heterogamous in term of education over the cohorts born in the first half of the 20th century. In younger cohorts, when women’s levels of education caught up with men’s, the age at marriage as well as the degree of homogamy increased again. Homogamy remained dominant throughout, but while women tended to marry men who were at least as highly educated as themselves until the 1950s cohorts, in more recent cohorts, women have tended to marry men who are at most as highly educated as themselves. Hypogamy is now the second most common pattern, after homogamy. Controlling for changes in the distribution of educational attainment by applying a log-linear model, we find that part of the changes in assortative mating in Belgium may be explained by changes in mate preferences regarding education. Finally, we find that hypogamous marriages tend to be contracted at later ages than homogamous or hypergamous ones.


1983 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas G. Bonett ◽  
Peter M. Bentler

2002 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 1597-1606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert B Wielgus ◽  
Pierre R Vernier ◽  
Tina Schivatcheva

We investigated grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) selection of three road types in the northern United States and southern British Columbia from 1986 to 1991. We hypothesized that grizzly bears select against open (public use allowed), restricted (forestry use only), and closed roads (no public use allowed) in that order. We analyzed use of roads for 11 bears (five females and six males) in an area containing open and closed roads and 11 bears (seven females and four males) in an adjacent area containing restricted roads. We used χ2 and log–linear models to test for selection of habitat type and distance to road categories. Ten of 12 females and 5 of 10 males (15 of 22 bears) selected against (P < 0.05) low-elevation interior cedar-hemlock and for (P < 0.05) high-elevation Englemann spruce (Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm.) – subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa (Hook.) Nutt.). After accounting for habitat, 4 of 5 females and 3 of 6 males (7 of 11 bears) selected against open roads and 3 of 5 females and 0 of 6 males (3 of 11 bears) selected against closed roads. No females (n = 7) or males (n = 4) (0 of 11 bears) selected against restricted roads. Our results are inconsistent with the hypothesis that bears select against open, restricted, and closed roads in that order. Most females and males selected against open roads, most females selected against closed roads, and no bears selected against restricted roads. The type of human activity along roads plays a role in bear responses to roads, and this aspect should be incorporated into future bear-road studies.


1996 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 327-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
James H. Albert

Biometrics ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murray Aitkin

2022 ◽  
pp. 0192513X2110598
Author(s):  
Kate H. Choi ◽  
Brandon G. Wagner

The General Educational Development (GED) degree is designed to be a credential equivalent to the high school diploma. However, growing evidence indicates that GED recipients have worse outcomes than high school graduates. Such findings raise the question: is the GED socially equivalent to the high school diploma? Although educational assortative mating patterns have long been used as a barometer of the social distance across educational groups, there has not been a study that has addressed this question by examining the marital sorting patterns of GED recipients. Using log-linear models, our study shows that the odds of intermarriage between GED recipients and high school graduates resemble those between GED recipients and those without a secondary degree. Racial/ethnic minorities had greater difficulty crossing the GED/high school graduate boundary when they married. Our findings detract from the purported view that the GED degree is equivalent to a traditional high school diploma.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document