scholarly journals A Patient with Central Dysrhythmia, Reduced Vestibular Response, and Directional Preponderance

2001 ◽  
Vol 80 (4) ◽  
pp. 199-199
Author(s):  
Kenneth H. Brookler
1978 ◽  
Vol 86 (5) ◽  
pp. ORL-830-ORL-833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary D. Becker

Caloric testing plays a prominent role in evaluating the vestibular system. A unilateral reduced vestibular response (RVR) is a common abnormality and is consistent with peripheral vestibular pathology. An erroneous interpretation of RVR may be made due to the following circumstances: laboratory technique, the influence of directional preponderance (DP) on monothermal tests (MT), unilateral hyperactivity, or pseudocaloric (PC) nystagmus. These errors in interpretation may be avoided by (1) repeating any single irrigation that is significantly different from the other three, to rule out laboratory technical error; (2) performing bithermal (BT) testing if any abnormality on monothermal testing exists, to eliminate the effects of directional preponderance; (3) observing that a right/left (R/L) difference is not due to unilateral hyperactivity, by noting absolute slow phase (SP) velocity; and (4) by demonstrating bidirectional sensitivity of the cupula before concluding that residual caloric function exists instead of no function.


2009 ◽  
Vol 106 (3) ◽  
pp. 893-903 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Ghanim ◽  
J. C. Lamy ◽  
A. Lackmy ◽  
V. Achache ◽  
N. Roche ◽  
...  

The vestibular responses evoked by transmastoid galvanic stimulation (GS) in the rectified soleus electromyogram (EMG) in freely standing human subjects disappear when seated. However, a GS-induced facilitation of the soleus monosynaptic (H and tendon jerk) reflex has been described in few experiments in subjects lying prone or seated. This study addresses the issue of whether this reflex facilitation while seated is of vestibulospinal origin. GS-induced responses in the soleus (modulation of the rectified ongoing EMG and of the monosynaptic reflexes) were compared in the same normal subjects while freely standing and sitting with back and head support. The polarity-dependent biphasic responses in the free-standing position were replaced by a non-polarity-dependent twofold facilitation while seated. The effects of GS were hardly detectable in the rectified ongoing voluntary EMG activity, weak for the H reflex, but large and constant for the tendon jerk. They were subject to habituation. Anesthesia of the skin beneath the GS electrodes markedly reduced the reflex facilitation, while a similar, although weaker, facilitation of the tendon jerk was observed when GS was replaced with purely cutaneous stimulation, a tap to the tendon of the sternomastoid muscle, or an auditory click. The stimulation polarity independence of the GS-induced reflex facilitation argues strongly against a vestibular response. However, the vestibular afferent volley, insufficient to produce a vestibular reflex response while seated, could summate with the GS-induced tactile or proprioceptive volley to produce a startle-like response responsible for the reflex facilitation.


1989 ◽  
Vol 7 (2-4) ◽  
pp. 309-310
Author(s):  
S. Mateeff ◽  
J. Hohnsbein ◽  
W.H. Ehrenstein ◽  
Z. Bohdanecký ◽  
T. Radil

1970 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 153-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Torok
Keyword(s):  

1986 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonard Proctor ◽  
Robert Glackin ◽  
Craig Smith ◽  
Hiroshi Shimizu ◽  
Paul Lietman

This study defines the normal limits of day-to-day variation in vestibular function. A short-acting caloric test was used and nystagmus intensity was measured by means of an interactive computerized technique. Data were analyzed from 30 normal subjects tested on three successive days and from ten of these subjects who were also tested on 11 additional occasions. Individual caloric test scores generally remained between 55% and 170% of their initial value; narrower ranges resulted when scores were averaged together. There was very little habituation of caloric responses. The upper normal limits of test-retest variation in scores for right-left difference and directional preponderance of caloric responses were 24% and 22%, respectively.


2001 ◽  
Vol 86 (5) ◽  
pp. 2323-2329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanning Han ◽  
Jeffrey T. Somers ◽  
Jae I. Kim ◽  
Arun N. Kumar ◽  
R. John Leigh

The gain of the human vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) is influenced by the proximity of the object of regard. In six human subjects, we measured the eye rotations induced by passive, sinusoidal, horizontal head rotations at 2.0 Hz during binocular fixation of a stationary far target at 7 m; a stationary target close to the subject's near point of fixation (<15 cm); and the bridge of the subject's own nose, viewed through a mirror positioned so that, for each subject, the angle of vergence was similar to that during viewing of the near target. The median gain of compensatory eye movements for the group of subjects during far viewing was 0.99 (range 0.80–1.04), during near viewing was 1.21 (range 0.88–1.47), and during mirror viewing was 0.85 (range 0.71–1.01). The gain during near and mirror viewing was significantly different for each subject ( P < 0.001) even though the vergence angles were similar. The lower gain values during mirror viewing can be attributed to the geometric relationship between the head rotation, the position of the eyes in the head, and the movement of the subject's virtual image in the mirror. To determine whether visually mediated eye movements were responsible for the observed gain values, we conducted a control experiment in which subjects were rotated using a sum-of-sines stimulus that minimized the effects of predictive visual tracking; differences of gain values between near- and mirror-viewing conditions were similar to those during rotation at 2 Hz. We conclude that, in these experiments, target proximity and vergence angle were not the key determinants of gain of the visuo-vestibular response during head rotation while viewing a near target but that contextual cues from motion vision were more important in generating the appropriate response.


1985 ◽  
Vol 99 (10) ◽  
pp. 973-977
Author(s):  
César Gavilán ◽  
Javier Gavilán ◽  
Argimira Abril
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document