Exploring Teacher Beliefs and Use of Acceleration, Ability Grouping, and Formative Assessment

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 245-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracy C. Missett ◽  
Marguerite M. Brunner ◽  
Carolyn M. Callahan ◽  
Tonya R. Moon ◽  
Amy Price Azano
2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 14-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan A. Plucker ◽  
Carolyn M. Callahan

There is substantial evidence on the effectiveness of many forms of advanced education, especially various approaches to acceleration, ability grouping, and curricular innovations such as structured curriculum and enrichment. Nonetheless, additional research on the ways in which advanced education impacts the learning and lives of students across the variables of class, race, ethnicity, and gender is still needed, as it is for most educational interventions. Jonathan Plucker and Carolyn Callahan share the evidence base for several popular strategies and describe what evidence is still needed.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C. Frank ◽  
Lawrence Liu

A good teacher is a good communicator. But communicating to a large audience can be difficult if audience members have differing preconceptions and hence construe the same message differently. Following this analogy of teaching as communication, we develop a framework for modeling classroom education as optimal communication to a variable audience. We study simple teaching games where teachers provide examples of a target concept to groups of students. Students synthesize these examples with their prior knowledge in order to induce the concept. We consider strategies for managing variability, including ability grouping ("tracking"), reductions in class size, and formative assessment. With known costs on actions, our model can also be extended for decision-theoretic analysis. This model provides a framework for estimating theoretical limits on the utility of educational interventions.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren E. Skidmore ◽  
James C. Kaufman
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document