Cognitive Skills and Academic Achievement of Deaf Children with Cochlear Implants

2012 ◽  
Vol 147 (4) ◽  
pp. 763-772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Huber ◽  
Ulrike Kipman
2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-70
Author(s):  
Ji Eun Choi ◽  
Sung Hwa Hong ◽  
Il Joon Moon

Background and Objectives: To assess the academic performance, communication skills, and psychosocial development of prelingual deaf children with cochlear implants (CIs) attending mainstream schools, and to evaluate the impact of auditory speech perception on their classroom performance.Subjects and Methods: As participant, 67 children with CI attending mainstream schools were included. A survey was conducted using a structured questionnaire on academic performance in the native language, second language, mathematics, social studies, science, art, communication skills, self-esteem, and social relations. Additionally, auditory and speech performances on the last follow-up were reviewed retrospectively.Results: Most implanted children attending mainstream school appeared to have positive self-esteem and confidence, and had little difficulty in conversing in a quiet classroom. Also, half of the implanted children (38/67) scored above average in general academic achievement. However, academic achievement in the second language (English), social studies, and science were usually poorer than general academic achievement. Furthermore, half of the implanted children had difficulty in understanding the class content (30/67) or conversing with peers in a noisy classroom (32/67). These difficulties were significantly associated with poor speech perception.Conclusions: Improving the listening environment for implanted children attending mainstream schools is necessary.


Author(s):  
William G. Kronenberger ◽  
David B. Pisoni

Prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants (CIs) have about 2 to 5 times more risk for delays in specific domains of executive functioning (EF) than normal-hearing (NH) children, with about 25% to 40% of children with CIs showing delays in specific EF subdomains. This chapter reviews the rationale and evidence for two theoretical approaches to explaining this elevated risk for EF delay: language-focused approaches and biopsychosocial systems theories, such as the auditory neurocognitive model. Research supporting language-focused approaches, which attribute risk of EF delays entirely to language delays, has significant limitations. Furthermore, results from an extensive data set of EF outcomes in CI users are inconsistent with language-focused approaches. In contrast, biopsychosocial systems theories, which attribute risk for EF delay to a system of factors, including auditory experience, language, family environment/experiences, fluid intelligence, and psychosocial influences, provide the strongest evidence and potential for explaining EF delays and outcomes in children with CIs.


2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (sup1) ◽  
pp. S84-S88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S Harris ◽  
David B Pisoni ◽  
William G Kronenberger ◽  
Sujuan Gao ◽  
Helena M Caffrey ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 150 (3) ◽  
pp. 260-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunilla Preisler ◽  
Anna-Lena Tvingstedt ◽  
Margareta Ahlstrom

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document