Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Midazolam with Syrup Chloral Hydrate for Procedural Sedation

2014 ◽  
Vol 151 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. P38-P38 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Mathew
2015 ◽  
Vol 153 (6) ◽  
pp. 1042-1050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Christy Sharafine Stephen ◽  
John Mathew ◽  
Ajoy Mathew Varghese ◽  
Mary Kurien ◽  
George Ani Mathew

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Chen ◽  
Xiaohui Wang ◽  
Mengrou Shi ◽  
Xin Li ◽  
Ting Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background:To determine the hypnotic and analgesic effects of brimonidine, and evaluate its efficacy and safety for general anesthesia. Potentiation of pentobarbital sleeping time with brimonidine was observed in mice, as was analgesic activity of brimonidine.Methods:The median effective dose (ED50)and lethal dose (LD50) of intraperitoneally injected brimonidine were determined in hypnotized mice. In addition, LD50 of intravenously injected brimonidine, ED50 of intravenously , intramuscularly and intrarectally injected brimonidine in hypnotized rabbits were determined. The synergistic anesthetic effect of brimonidine and chloral hydrate on rabbits was evaluated. Results:Intraperitoneal injection of 10 mg/kg brimonidine enhanced the hypnotic effect of a threshold dose of pentobarbital. Intraperitoneal injection brimonidine produced dose-related analgesic effects in mice. ED50 of intraperitoneally administered brimonidine in hypnotized mice was 75.7 mg/kg, and LD50 was 379 mg/kg. The ED50 of intravenous, intramuscular and intrarectal brimonidine for hypnosis in rabbits were 5.2 mg/kg, 8.8 mg/kg and 8.7mg/kg, respectively, and LD50 of intravenous brimonidine was 146 mg/kg. Combined intravenous administration of 0.6 mg/kg brimonidine and 0.03 g/kg chloral hydrate had a synergistic anesthetic effects.Conclusions:Brimonidine elicited hypnotic and analgesic effects after systemic administration, and exhibited safety. Brimonidine enhanced the effects of other types of narcotics when combined.


2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 236-239
Author(s):  
Kimberley M. Farr ◽  
Brady S. Moffett ◽  
Jennifer L. Jones ◽  
Amber P. Rogers ◽  
Corrie E. Chumpitazi

Brief Overview: The use of chloral hydrate as the primary sedation agent has declined across the nation after commercial production of the liquid formulation ceased. Although alternative sedatives have gained popularity, some pharmacies have continued to provide oral chloral hydrate by compounding it from raw ingredients. Thus, oral chloral hydrate use has continued in children despite the availability of alternative effective agents. Objective: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate institutional chloral hydrate utilization as the primary agent for procedural sedation. Design/Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients given chloral hydrate for procedural sedation from October 2010 to December 2016. The hospital pharmacy database of chloral hydrate use at our 2 free-standing children’s hospitals was reviewed and matched to procedure billing data. Results: There were 5874 chloral hydrate administrations for procedural sedation during the study period. The highest rates of use occurred in 2014, when there were 1420 chloral hydrate orders within our hospital. The large majority of sedations were for cardiac studies/procedures (n = 4250, 72.4%). Conclusions: Despite significant declines in use of chloral hydrate for procedural sedation across the country, local utilization of oral chloral hydrate remains high. Recent declines may be due to high-use clinical sites transitioning to alternative sedatives such as intranasal dexmedetomidine.


Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (27) ◽  
pp. e20765
Author(s):  
Feng Wang ◽  
Qian Zhou ◽  
Minhuan Shen ◽  
Jing Quan ◽  
Jiejuan Chen ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 408-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustavo Falbo Wandalsen ◽  
Fernanda de Cordoba Lanza ◽  
Márcia Cristina Pires Nogueira ◽  
Dirceu Solé

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document