Coronary endarterectomy in coronary artery disease: Factors affecting graft patency and survival

2021 ◽  
pp. 021849232110068
Author(s):  
Simon CY Chow ◽  
Jacky YK Ho ◽  
Micky WT Kwok ◽  
Takuya Fujikawa ◽  
Kevin Lim ◽  
...  

Background Coronary endarterectomy aims to improve completeness of revascularization in patients with occluded coronary vessels. The benefits of coronary endarterectomy remain uncertain. The aim of this study was to evaluate short-term surgical outcomes and factors affecting graft patency post-coronary endarterectomy. Methods Between 2009 and 2019, 81 consecutive patients who had coronary endarterectomy done were evaluated for their perioperative and early results. A total of 36 patients with follow-up coronary studies were included in patency analysis. Mortality rates, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, and graft patency were outcomes of interest. Survival and risk factor analysis were performed with Kaplan–Meier and logistic regression analysis. Results The average age of the cohort was 61.9 ± 9.29 years. Complete revascularization rate was 95.4% post-coronary endarterectomy. The 30-day and 1-year mortality was 2.5 and 6.2%, respectively. One-year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events rate was 11.1%. Periprocedural myocardial infarction rate was 7.4%. Three patients required repeat revascularization within a mean follow-up duration of 49.6 ± 36.5 months. Overall graft patency was 89.2% at 20.2 months and graft patency post-coronary endarterectomy was 85.4%. Arterial grafts showed 100% patency. Vein grafts to endarterectomized obtuse marginal branch had patency rates of 33.3%. Multiple endarterectomies were associated with worse one-year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (OR: 28.6 ± 1.16; P = 0.003). Conclusions Coronary endarterectomy facilitates completeness of revascularization and does not increase early mortality. Graft patency post-coronary endarterectomy on obtuse marginal artery was suboptimal. Judicious use of coronary endarterectomy should be practiced to balance the need of completeness of revascularization against the risk of myocardial infarction.

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alaide Chieffo ◽  
Valeria Magni ◽  
Francesco Maisano ◽  
Alfonso Ielasi ◽  
Azeem Latib ◽  
...  

One-year outcome following drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation versus coronary artery by-pass grafting (CABG) in unprotected LMCA lesions have been previously reported from our center. Methods and results Two hundred forty-nine consecutive patients with an unprotected LMCA stenosis electively treated (107 with PCI and DES implantation and 142 with CABG) in our Center, between March 2002 and July 2004, were analysed. Hierarchical study end points were occurrence at 4 years of: death; death and/or myocardial infarction (MI); death, MI and/or stroke; target vessel revascularization (TVR, defined as any revascularization in left coronary system); and major cardiac cerebrovascular events (MACCE). A propensity analysis was performed to adjust for baseline differences between the two cohorts. At 4 year-clinical follow-up, no difference was found between PCI and CABG in the occurrence of death (respectively 12.0% vs. 14.1%; unadjusted odds ratio- OR=0.845; 95% confidence interval-CI=0.365 to 1.890; P=0.80; adjusted OR=0.652; 95% CI=0.254 to 1.620; P=0.42). At adjusted analysis, PCI group showed a trend toward a lower occurrence of the composite endpoint of death and myocardial infarction (13.0% vs. 19.7%; adjusted OR=0.461; 95% CI=0.180 to 1.088; P=0.08). PCI was associated with a lower rate of the composite endpoint of death, MI and/or stroke (respectively 14.0% vs. 22.5%; unadjusted OR=0.519; 95% CI=0.238to 1.071; P=0.07; adjusted OR=0.431; 95% CI=0.175 to 0.971; P=0.04). Indeed, CABG was correlated to lower TVR (8.4% vs. 28% ; unadjusted OR= 5.018; 95% CI= 1.990-23.8; p=0.0001; adjusted OR= 5.928; 95% CI= 1.933 – 38.0; p= 0.0003). No difference was detected in the occurrence of MACCE ( in PCI 36.4% vs. 28.1% in CABG, unadjusted OR=1.409; 95% CI=0.798 to 2.509 P=0.259; adjusted OR=1.438; 95% CI=0.754 to 2.766; P=0.3007). Conclusions At 4 year-clinical follow-up, in this single-center experience, there was still no difference in the occurrence of MACCE between elective PCI with DES implantation and CABG in LMCA lesions. There was an advantage of PCI in the composite endpoint of death, MI and/or stroke, while a benefit in the need for reintervention was still found in CABG. :


1994 ◽  
Vol 72 (05) ◽  
pp. 676-681 ◽  
Author(s):  
J van der Meer ◽  
H L Hillege ◽  
P H J M Dunselman ◽  
B J M Mulder ◽  
H R Michels ◽  
...  

SummaryTo assess the optimal level of oral anticoagulation to prevent occlusion of vein coronary bypass grafts, 318 patients from a graft patency trial were analysed retrospectively. Oral anticoagulant therapy was started one day before surgery and continued for one year, after which graft occlusion was assessed by angiography. The aimed level of anticoagulation was 2.8-1.8 International Normalized Ratio (INR). Clinical outcome was assessed by the incidence of myocardial infarction, thrombosis and major bleeding.The observed anticoagulation level was 2.8-4.8 INR for 54%, and 1.8-3.8 INR for 75% of time per patient. Occlusion rates in patients who spent <35, 35-70, and ≥70% of time within INR range 2.8-1.8 were 10.5%, 10.8% and 11.8%, respectively (differences not statistically significant). Patients who spent ≥70% of time within INR range 1.8-3.8 versus 2.8-4.8 showed comparable occlusion rates. The risk of graft occlusion was not related to quality of anticoagulation early (0-3 months) or late (3-12 months) after surgery. Myocardial infarction, thrombosis and major bleeding occurred in 1.3%, 2.0% and 2.9% of patients.To maintain vein graft patency in the first postoperative year by oral anticoagulation, a level within INR range 1.8-3.8 for ≥70% of time seems to be sufficient.


2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Piotrowicz ◽  
P Orzechowski ◽  
I Kowalik ◽  
R Piotrowicz

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): National Health Fund Background. A novel comprehensive care program after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) „KOS-zawał" was implemented in Poland. It includes acute intervention, complex revascularization, implantation of cardiovascular electronic devices (in case of indications), rehabilitation or hybrid telerehabilitation (HTR) and scheduled outpatient follow-up. HTR is a unique component of this program. The purpose of the pilot study was to evaluate a feasibility, safety and patients’ acceptance of HTR as component of a novel care program after AMI and to assess mortality in a one-year follow-up. Methods The study included 55 patients (LVEF 55.6 ± 6.8%; aged 57.5 ± 10.5 years). Patients underwent a 5-week HTR based on Nordic walking, consisting of an initial stage (1 week) conducted within an outpatient center and a basic stage (4-week) home-based telerehabilitation five times weekly. HTR was telemonitored with a device adjusted to register electrocardiogram (ECG) recording and to transmit data via mobile phone network to the monitoring center. The moments of automatic ECG registration were pre-set and coordinated with exercise training. The influence on physical capacity was assessed by comparing changes in functional capacity (METs) from the beginning and the end of HTR. Patients filled in a questionnaire in order to assess their acceptance of HTR at the end of telerehabilitation. Results HTR resulted in a significant improvement in functional capacity and workload duration in exercise test (Table). Safety: there were neither deaths nor adverse events during HTR. Patients accepted HTR, including the need for interactive everyday collaboration with the monitoring center. Prognosis all patients survived in a one-year follow-up. Conclusions Hybrid telerehabilitation is a feasible, safe form of rehabilitation, well accepted by patients. There were no deaths in a one-year follow-up. Outcomes before and after HTR Before telerehabilitation After telerehabilitation P Exercise time [s] 381.5 ± 92.0 513.7 ± 120.2 &lt;0.001 Maximal workload [MET] 7.9 ± 1.8 10.1 ± 2.3 &lt;0.001 Heart rate rest [bpm] 68.6 ± 12.0 66.6 ± 10.9 0.123 Heart rate max effort [bpm] 119.7 ± 15.9 131.0 ± 20.1 &lt;0.001 SBP rest [mmHg] 115.6 ± 14.8 117.7 ± 13.8 0.295 DBP rest [mmHg] 74.3 ± 9.2 76.2 ± 7.3 0.079 SBP max effort [mm Hg] 159.5 ± 25.7 170.7 ± 25.5 0.003 DBP max effort [mm Hg] 84.5 ± 9.2 87.2 ± 9.3 0.043 SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M.E Gimbel ◽  
D.R.P.P Chan Pin Yin ◽  
R.S Hermanides ◽  
F Kauer ◽  
A.H Tavenier ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Elderly patients form a large and growing part of the patients presenting with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Choosing the optimal antithrombotic treatment in these elderly patients is more complicated because they frequently have characteristics indicating both a high ischaemic and high bleeding risk. Purpose We describe the treatment of elderly patients (&gt;75 years) admitted with NSTEMI, present the outcomes (major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and bleeding) and aim to find predictors for adverse events. Methods The POPular AGE registry is an investigator initiated, prospective, observational, multicentre study of patients aged 75 years or older presenting with NSTEMI. Patients were recruited between August 1st, 2016 and May 7th, 2018 at 21 sites in the Netherlands. The primary composite endpoint of MACE included cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and non-fatal stroke at one-year follow-up. Results A total of 757 patients were enrolled. During hospital stay 76% underwent coronary angiography, 34% percutaneous coronary intervention and 12% coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). At discharge 78.6% received aspirin (non-users mostly because of the combination of oral anticoagulant and clopidogrel), 49.7% were treated with clopidogrel, 34.2% with ticagrelor and 29.6% were prescribed oral anticoagulation. Eighty-three percent of patients received dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) or dual therapy consisting of oral anticoagulation and at least one antiplatelet agent for a duration of 12 months. At one year, the primary outcome of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or stroke occurred in 12.3% of patients and major bleeding (BARC 3 or 5) occurred in 4.8% of the patients. The risk of MACE and major bleeding was highest during the first month and stayed high over time for MACE while the risk for major bleeding levelled off. Independent predictors for MACE were age, renal function, medical history of CABG, stroke and diabetes. The only independent predictor for major bleeding was haemoglobin level on admission. Conclusion In this all-comers registry, most elderly patients (≥75 years) with NSTEMI are treated with DAPT and undergoing coronary angiography the same way as younger NSTEMI patients from the SWEDEHEART registry. Aspirin use was lower as was the use of the more potent P2Y12 inhibitors compared to the SWEDEHEART which is very likely due to the concomitant use of oral anticoagulation in 30% of patients. The fact that ischemic risk stays constant over 1 year of follow-up, while the bleeding risk levels off after one month may suggest the need of dual antiplatelet therapy until at least one year after NSTEMI. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): AstraZeneca


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Krljanac ◽  
D Trifunovic ◽  
M Asanin ◽  
L Savic ◽  
J Vratonjic ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Malignant arrhythmias, ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) in acute myocardial infarction (AIM) carry ominous prognosis including sudden cardiac death (SCD). It is not clear whether the timing of VT/VF occurrence always affects the poor prognosis of patients with AMI. Aim To investigate the prognosis of patients who undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in accordance with timing of VT/VF and to find the power predictors of their occurrence. Methods 307 consecutive patients in PREDICT-VT study (NCT03263949), 57.9±10.6 year old, 72.3% males were analysed. Of these patients, 27.7% had VT/VF from the symptoms onset, within 48 hours of AIM (early VT/VF group). 8.1% of patients had VT/VF after 48h, during one year follow up (late VT/VF group). Results The frequency of VT/VF occurrence was high between symptoms onset and the end of 2nd month and during 5th and 6th month of AIM. The parameters of conventional echocardiography were significantly impaired in late VT/VF group, as well as parameters of longitudinal strain (LS) (table). Moreover, the MACE (cardiovascular mortality, SCD, new infarction, emergency revascularisation, and hospitalized heart failure) was the highest in late VT/VF group (p=0.000). The most significant predictor of late VT/VF was systolic LS (cut off −12.72%, ROC 0.680, Sen 71%, Sp 64%, p=0.006). Conclusions Although late VT/VF occurrence after primary PCI were less frequent than early VT/VF occurrence, patients with late VT/VF had a very poor prognosis. The most power predictor of late VT/VF were systolic longitudinal strain. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Clinical Center of Serbia


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 114
Author(s):  
F. Chagué ◽  
N. Hounton ◽  
I. Lhuillier ◽  
S. Guinchard ◽  
M. Maza ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Wienbergen ◽  
A Fach ◽  
S Meyer ◽  
J Schmucker ◽  
R Osteresch ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The effects of an intensive prevention program (IPP) for 12 months following 3-week rehabilitation after myocardial infarction (MI) have been proven by the randomized IPP trial. The present study investigates if the effects of IPP persist one year after termination of the program and if a reintervention after &gt;24 months (“prevention boost”) is effective. Methods In the IPP trial patients were recruited during hospitalization for acute MI and randomly assigned to IPP versus usual care (UC) one month after discharge (after 3-week rehabilitation). IPP was coordinated by non-physician prevention assistants and included intensive group education sessions, telephone calls, telemetric and clinical control of risk factors. Primary study endpoint was the IPP Prevention Score, a sum score evaluating six major risk factors. The score ranges from 0 to 15 points, with a score of 15 points indicating best risk factor control. In the present study the effects of IPP were investigated after 24 months – one year after termination of the program. Thereafter, patients of the IPP study arm with at least one insufficiently controlled risk factor were randomly assigned to a 2-months reintervention (“prevention boost”) vs. no reintervention. Results At long-term follow-up after 24 months, 129 patients of the IPP study arm were compared to 136 patients of the UC study arm. IPP was associated with a significantly better risk factor control compared to UC at 24 months (IPP Prevention Score 10.9±2.3 points in the IPP group vs. 9.4±2.3 points in the UC group, p&lt;0.01). However, in the IPP group a decrease of risk factor control was observed at the 24-months visit compared to the 12-months visit at the end of the prevention program (IPP Prevention Score 10.9±2.3 points at 24 months vs. 11.6±2.2 points at 12 months, p&lt;0.05, Figure 1). A 2-months reintervention (“prevention boost”) was effective to improve risk factor control during long-term course: IPP Prevention Score increased from 10.5±2.1 points to 10.7±1.9 points in the reintervention group, while it decreased from 10.5±2.1 points to 9.7±2.1 points in the group without reintervention (p&lt;0.05 between the groups, Figure 1). Conclusions IPP was associated with a better risk factor control compared to UC during 24 months; however, a deterioration of risk factors after termination of IPP suggests that even a 12-months prevention program is not long enough. The effects of a short reintervention after &gt;24 months (“prevention boost”) indicate the need for prevention concepts that are based on repetitive personal contacts during long-term course after coronary events. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Stiftung Bremer Herzen (Bremen Heart Foundation)


2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Smiljana V. Pavlovic ◽  
Dragana P. Sobic-Saranovic ◽  
Branko D. Beleslin ◽  
Miodrag C. Ostojic ◽  
Milan A. Nedeljkovic ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Walid Omar ◽  
Karim Mashhour ◽  
Ahmed Mowafy ◽  
Hatem El Atroush ◽  
Helmy El Ghawaby

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document